User involvement in developing rehabilitation robotic devices: An essential requirement

2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 196-204

  Holt, Raymond ^a   Makower, Sophie ^b   Jackson, Andrew ^a   Culmer, Pete ^a   Levesley, Martin ^a   Richardson, Robert ^c   Cozens, Alastair ^d   Williams, Mark Mon ^e   Bhakta, Bipin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Department of Rehabilitation Medicine ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; PNEUMATIC ARM MOVEMENT; REHABILITATION ROBOTICS; ROBOTIC DEVICES; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; STROKE PATIENTS; STROKE REHABILITATION; USER INVOLVEMENT; USER TESTING;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 48349125382     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428427     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Takahashi, C.D., Timozyk W.K., Reinkensmeyer, A.N., Khan, L.E. (2001) Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke. Advanced Robotics, Vol. 47, (7), pp. 625-637.
2. Sanchez, R.J., Wolbrecht, E., et al. (2005) A pneumatic robot for retraining arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 500-504.
3. nd ed., Eastleigh, Involve Support Unit.
4. Wiklund M. E. (2005) The Rising Bar- Medical Product Design Excellence In: Designing Usability into Medical Products, Wiklund M. E. & Wilcox S. B. (2005)
5. Martin J.L., MurphyE., Crowe J.A. Ä Norris B.J. "Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics". Physiological Measurement, 27, pp. R49-R62, 2006
6. Girone M., Burdea G., Bouzit M., Popescu V. & Deutsch J. E. (2000) Girone, M., G. Burdea, M. Bouzit, and J. Deutsch, "Orthopedic Rehabilitation using the 'Rutgers Ankle' Interface," Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2000, IOS Press, pp. 89-95, January 2000.
7. Dijkers M.P. & deBear P.C. (1991) patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol 28, (2), Spring, pp.33-44.
8. Lee M., Rittenhouse M., & Abdullah H.A. (2005) Design Issues for Therapeutic Robot Systems: Results from a survey of Physiotherapists. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol 42,pp.239-252.
9. Lacey G. & MacNamara M. (2000) User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development Vol. 37 No. 6, November/December 2000
10. Mulholland S.J., Packer T.L., Laschinger S.J., Lysack J.T., Wyss U.P. & Balaram S. "Evaluating a new mobility device: feedback from women with disabilities in India". Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 22, no.3, pp.111-122, 2000.
11. Gitlin L.N., Luborsky M.R. & Schemm RL. "Emerging Concerns of Older Stroke Patients About Assistive Device Use". The Gerontologist, vol.38, no.2, pp.169-180, April 1998.