The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: Identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 420-431

  Lu, Elaine C ^a   Wang, Rosalie H ^b   Hebert, Debbie ^b,c   Boger, Jennifer ^c   Galea, Mary P ^d   Mihailidis, Alex ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

design requirements; occupational therapy; physiotherapy; Rehabilitation; stroke; survey; therapeutic robotics

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNET; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARAPLEGIA; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; INTERNET; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARAPLEGIA; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79958738515     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.544370     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Truelsen T, Bonita R. The worldwide burden of stroke: current status and future projections. In: Fisher M, editor. The worldwide burden of stroke: Current status and future projections. Handbook of clinical neurology, Vol. 92 (3rd series): Stroke part 1: Basic and epidemiological aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009. pp 327-336.
2. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741-754.
3. Adams HP. Principles of cerebrovascular disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007.
4. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nature Rev: Neurosci 2009;10:861-872.
5. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. II. Time course of recovery. The copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-412.
6. Gresham GE, Alexander D, Bishop DS, Giuliani C, Goldberg G, Holland A, Kelly-Hayes M, Linn RT, Roth EJ, Stason WB, et al. Rehabil J 2010;26:28. http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/28/7/1522.
7. Lowry F. Stroke rehabilitation services inadequate, experts say. Can Med Assoc J 2010;182:E283-E284.
8. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards L, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upperlimb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1772-1783.
9. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121. (Pubitemid 351287594)
10. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:22-44. (Pubitemid 350156151)
11. Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. National clinical guideline for stroke. 3rd ed. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.
12. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, Zorowitz RD, Bakas T, Clark P, Billinger SA. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Stroke 2010;41:2402-2448.
13. Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:955-960.
14. Lee M, Rittenhouse M, Abdullah HA. Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. J Intell Robot Syst 2005;42:239-252. (Pubitemid 41117839)
15. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:11-19. (Pubitemid 39658414)
16. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C. Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:40-53. (Pubitemid 34226095)
17. Interactive Motion Technologies Inc. Inmotion robots for rehabilitation Journal. 2010. http://interactive-motion. com/. Last accessed 2 June 2010.
18. Hocoma. Armeo therapy concept. 2010. http://www.hocoma. com/en/products/armeo/. Last accessed 2 June 2010.
19. Stanger C, Anglin C, Harwin W, Romilly D. Devices for assisting manipulation: a summary of user task priorities. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1994;2:256-265.
20. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S. Rapid contextual design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2005.
21. Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
22. Cooper R. Rehabilitation engineering applied to mobility and manipulation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group; 1995.
23. Nilsson LM, Nordholm LA. Physical therapy in stroke rehabilitation: bases for Swedish physiotherapists' choice of treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 1992;8:49-55.
24. Davidson I, Waters K. Physiotherapists working with stroke patients: a national survey. Physiother Theory Pract 2000;86:69-80.
25. Sackley CM, Lincoln NB. Physiotherapy treatment for stroke patients: a survey of current practice. Physiother Theory Pract 1996;12:87-96. (Pubitemid 26235398)
26. Carr JH, Mungovan SF, Shepherd RB, Dean CM, Nordholm LA. Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 1994;10:201-209.
27. Lennon S. Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:455-461. (Pubitemid 36656601)
28. Natarajan P, Oelschlager A, Agah A, Phol PS, Ahmad SO, Liu W. Current clinical practices in stroke rehabilitation: regional pilot survey. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:841-850.
29. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 1996;312:71.
30. Abramson JH, Abramsom ZH. Survey methods in community medicine. 5th ed. Toronto: Elsevier; 1999.
31. Tastle WJ, College I, Wierman MJ, Dumdum UR. Ranking ordinal scales using the consensus measure. Info Syst 2005; VI: 96-102.
32. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measurement 1973;33:613-619.
33. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985;65:175-180. (Pubitemid 15140059)
34. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Hullenaar SV, J. Sanford, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the chedokemcmaster stroke assessement. Stroke 1993;24:58-63. (Pubitemid 23014383)
35. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
36. Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864-870. (Pubitemid 19188240)
37. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981;4:483-492. (Pubitemid 12144660)
38. Wolf S, Catlin P, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635-1639. (Pubitemid 32631916)
39. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
40. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glansberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005;36:e100-e143.
41. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E. The effect of the gentle/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:395-405. (Pubitemid 351833329)
42. Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R. Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot armin ii in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2009;6:1-10. http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/6/1/46. Last accessed December 2010.
43. Casadio M, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V. A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:217-228.
44. Teasell RW, Kalra L. What's new in stroke rehabilitation: back to basics. Stroke 2005;36:215-217. (Pubitemid 40170787)
45. Shih T-H, Fan X. Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: a meta-analysis. Field Methods 2008;20:249-271.