The effect of anaerobic biomass drying and exposure to air on their recovery and evolution

Water Research

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 42-51

  Massalha, Nedal ^a,b   Brenner, Asher ^a   Sheindorf, Chaim ^c   Sabbah, Isam ^b,d  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b Galilee Society Institute of Applied Research   (Israel)

^c Edelstein Center for the Analysis of Ancient Artifacts Department of Chemical Engineering Shenkar College of Engineering Design and Art   (Israel)

^d Braude College   (Israel)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biodegradation rate; Drying methods; McrA; Methanogenic activity; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; BIOMASS; DRYING; GENES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA; SLUDGE DIGESTION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

'DRY' [; 16S RRNA GENE; ANAEROBIC BIOMASS; BIODEGRADATION RATE; DRYING METHODS; MCRA; METHANOGENIC ACTIVITY; PROCESS FAILURE; TOTAL BIOMASS; WASH OUT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

RNA 16S; METHANE; SEWAGE;

AIR EXPOSURE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; DIGESTIBILITY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INOCULATION; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; RNA; WASTEWATER;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE PROBE; METHANOGEN; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER CONTENT; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARCHAEON; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; METHANE; MICROBIOTA; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 84903382965     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson K.L., Apolinario E.E., Sowers K.R. Desiccation as a long-term survival mechanism for the archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78(5):1473-1479.
2. Agrawal L.K., Jayadevan J.Y., Harada H., Nakamura K. Utilization of dried pelletized anaerobic sludge for anaerobic treatment of wastewater. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 83(1):91-95.
3. Berney M., Hammes F., Bosshard F., Weilenmann H.-U., Egli T. Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73(10):3283-3290.
4. Boone D.R., Castenholz R.W. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria 2001, vol. 1. Springer, New York.
5. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(10):4044-4064.
6. Chen Y.R., Hashimoto A.G. Substrate utilization kinetic model for biological treatment processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22(10):2081-2095.
7. Connaughton S., Collins G., O'Flaherty V. Development of microbial community structure and activity in high-rate anaerobic bioreactor at 18°C. Water Res. 2006, 40(5):1009-1017.
8. Fernandez A.S., Hashsham S.A., Dollhopf S.L., Raskin L., Glagoleva O., Dazzo F.B., Hickey R.F., Criddle C.S., Tiedje J.M. Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66(9):4058-4067.
9. Fiss N., Smith S. Green Industrial Wastewater Treatment Utilizing Anaerobic Processes 2007, 87th Annual Conference, December 2-5, 2007, NC AWWA-WEA, Charlotte, NC.
10. Godon J.J., Zumstein E., Dabert P., Habouzit F., Molletta R. Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63:2802-2813.
11. Hales B.A., Edwards C., Ritchie D.A., Hall G., Pickup R.W., Saunders J.R. Isolation and identification of methanogen-specific DNA from blanket bog feat by PCR amplification and sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62(2):668-675.
12. Hashsham S.A., Fernandez A.S., Dollhopf S.L., Dazzo F.B., Hickey R.F., Tiedje J.M., Criddle C.S. Parallel processing of substrate correlates with greater functional stability in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66(9):4050-4057.
13. ® BacLight™Bacterial viability kits Product Information. http://tools.lifetechnologies.com/content/sfs/manuals/mp07007.pdf.
14. Jagadish H.P., Malourdu A.R., Muralidhara P.L., Desai S.M., Mahadeva G.K.R. Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth using poultry litter as inoculum. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2012, 3(2):9418.
15. Josephson K.L., Gerba C.P., Pepper I.L. Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59(10):3513-3515.
16. Kendrick M.G., Kral T.A. Survival of methanogens during desiccation: implications for life on Mars. Astrobiology 2006, 6(4):546-551.
17. Krishania M., Vijay V.K., Chandra R. Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay. Energy 2013, 57:359-367.
18. Lee C., Kim J., Shin S.G., O'Flaherty V., Hwang S. Quantitative and qualitative transitions of methanogen community structure during the batch anaerobic digestion of cheese processing wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87(5):1963-1973.
19. Liu C.T., Miyaki T., Aono T., Oyaizu H. Evaluation of methanogenic strains and their ability to endure aeration and water stress. Curr. Microbiol. 2008, 56(3):214-218.
20. López-Amorós R., Castel S., Comas-Riu J., Vives-Rego J. Assessment of E. coli and Salmonella viability and starvation by confocal laser microscopy and flow cytometry using rhodamine 123, DiBAC4(3), propidium iodide, and CTC. Cytometry 1997, 29(4):298-305.
21. Luton P.E., Wayne J.M., Sharp R.J., Riley P.W. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 2002, 148:3521-3530.
22. Mayer H.P., Conrad R. Factors influencing the population of methanogenic bacteria and the initiation of methane production upon flooding of paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1990, 73(2):103-112.
23. McFeters G.A., Yu F.P., Pyle B.H., Stewart P.S. Physiological assessment of bacteria using fluorochromes. J. Microbiol. Methods 1995, 21(1):1-13.
24. McMahon K., Zheng D., Stams A., Mackie R., Raskin L. Microbial population dynamics during start-up and overload conditions of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and sewage sludge. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 87(7):823-834.
25. Mitchell A.,M., Baldwil D.,S. The effects of sediment desiccation on the potential for nitrification, denitrification and methanogenesis in an Australian reservoir. Hydrobiologia 1999, 392(1):3-11.
26. MO BIO Laboratories, Inc. PowerSoil®-htp 96 Well Soil DNA Isolation Kit. Instruction Manual. Website:. http://www.mobio.com.
27. 2-enriched anaerobic biomass. Microb. Biotechnol. 2014, 7(1):77-84.
28. Nettmann E., Bergmann I., Mundt K., Linke B., Klocke M. Archaea diversity within a commercial biogas plant utilizing herbal biomass determined by 16S rDNA and mcrA analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105(6):1835-1850.
29. Nocker A., Camper A.K. Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidiummonoazide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72(3):1997-2004.
30. Peters V., Conrad R. Methanogenic and other strictly anaerobic bacteria in desert soil and other oxic soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61(4):1673-1676.
31. Pettipher G.L., Mansell R., Mckinnon C.M. Rapid membrane filtration epifluorescent micro-scopy technique for direct enumeration of bacteria in raw milk. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1980, 39(2):42-429.
32. Sousa D.Z., Salvador A.F., Ramos J., Guedes A.P., Barbosa S., Stams A.J.M., Alves M.M., Pereira M.A. Activity and viability of methanogens in anaerobic digestion of unsaturated and saturated long-chain fatty acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79(14):4239-4245.
33. Steinberg L.M., Regan J.M. Response of lab-scale methanogenic reactors inoculated from different sources to organic loading rate shocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(19):8790-8798.
34. Tale V.P., Maki J.S., Struble C.A., Zitomer D.H. Methanogen community structure-activity relationship and bioaugmentation of overloaded anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2011, 45(16):5249-5256.
35. Thauer R.K. Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. Microbiology 1998, 144(9):2377-2406.
36. Virta M., Lineri S., Kankaanpaa P., Karp M., Peltonen K., Nuutila J. Determination of complement-mediated killing of bacteria by viability staining and bioluminescence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64(2):515-519.
37. Werner J.J., Knights D., Garcia M.L., Scalfone N.B., Smith S., Yarasheski K. Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108(10):4158-4163.
38. Weissmann H., Beimfohr C. Probing the problem. Water21 August 2004, 6.4:41-42.
39. Wittebolle L., Marzorati M., Clement L., Balloi A., Daffonchio D., Heylen K., De Vos P., Verstraete W., Boon N. Initial community evenness favours functionality underselective stress. Nature 2009, 458(7238):623-626.
40. Woese C.R., Fox G.E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74(11):5088-5090.
41. Yu Y., Lee C., Kim J., Hwang S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89:670-679.