Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: The unholy trinity of scientific writing

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 225-227

  Zietman, Anthony L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; WHISTLEBLOWING; WRITING;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PLAGIARISM; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; WRITING;

EID: 84882777373     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.004     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. F.C. Feng, R.G. Steen, and A. Casadevall Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109 2012 17028 17033
2. M.L. Grieneisen, and M. Zhang A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature PLoS One 7 2012 e44118
3. E. Heitman, and S. Litewka International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees Urol Oncol 29 2011 104 108
4. Committee on Publication Ethics. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/ files/Code-of-conduct-for-journal-editors.pdf.
5. C.G. Begley Six red flags for suspect work Nature 497 2013 433 434