Neural coding of phonemic fricative contrast with and without hearing aid

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Miller, Sharon ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic change complex; Event related potential; Fricative; Hearing aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903272494     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adler, G., & Adler, J. (1989). Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range. Audiology, 28, 316-324.
2. Agung, K., Purdy, S. C., McMahon, C. M., et al. (2006). The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 559-572.
3. Billings, C. J., Tremblay, K. L., Miller, C. W. (2011). Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain. Int J Audiol, 50, 459-467.
4. Billings, C. J., Tremblay, K. L., Souza, P. E., et al. (2007). Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 234-246.
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1999). Pratt: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Technical Report, 132, Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam.
6. Ceponiene, R., Rinne, T., Näätänen, R. (2002). Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, 113, 870-882.
7. Ceponiene, R., Torki, M., Alku, P., et al. (2008). Event-related potentials reflect spectral differences in speech and non-speech stimuli in children and adults. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 1560-1577.
8. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature, 370, 292-295.
9. Dien, J., Santuzzi, A.M. (2005). Application of repeated measures ANOVA to datasets: A review and tutorial. In T.C. Handy (Eds.), Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook (pp. 57-82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Digeser, F. M., Wohlberedt, T., Hoppe, U. (2009). Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant- vowel syllables. Ear Hear, 30, 704-712.
11. Hari, R. (1991). Activation of the human auditory cortex by speech sounds. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 491, 132-7; discussion 138.
12. Harris, K. S. (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Lang Speech, 1, 1-7.
13. Hedrick, M. S., & Ohde, R. N. (1993). Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2005-2026.
14. Hedrick, M. S., & Younger, M. S. (2003). Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 46, 636-648.
15. Heinz, J. M., & Stevens, K. N. (1961). On the properties of voiceless fricatives. J Acoust Soc Am, 33, 589-596.
16. Hughes, G. W., & Halle, M. (1956). Spectral properties of fricative consonants. J Acoust Soc Am, 28, 303-310.
17. Jacobson, G. P., Lombardi, D. M., Gibbens, N. D., et al. (1992). The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1. Ear Hear, 13, 300-306.
18. Kaukoranta, E., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V. (1987). Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants. Exp Brain Res, 69, 19-23.
19. Key, A. P., Dove, G. O., Maguire, M. J. (2005). Linking brainwaves to the brain: An ERP primer. Dev Neuropsychol, 27, 183-215.
20. Ladefoged, P. (1962). Elements of Acoustic Phonetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lehmann, D., & Skrandies, W. (1984). Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man - A review. Prog Neurobiol, 23, 227-250.
22. Luck, S. J. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (1999). Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear, 20, 33-44.
24. Martin, B. A., & Boothroyd, A. (2000). Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2155-2161.
25. Martin, B. A., Boothroyd, A., Ali, D., et al. (2010). Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: Increasing efficiency. Ear Hear, 31, 356-366.
26. Martin, B. A., Tremblay, K. L., Korczak, P. (2008). Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 285-313.
27. May, P. J., & Tiitinen, H. (2010). Mismatch negativity (MMN), the devianceelicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology, 47, 66-122.
28. Moulines, E., & Charpentier, F. (1990). Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Commun, 9, 453-467.
29. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
30. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull, 125, 826-859.
31. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., et al. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clin Neurophysiol, 118, 2544-2590.
32. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T., et al. (2004). The mismatch negativity (MMN): Towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 140-144.
33. Ostroff, J. M., Martin, B. A., Boothroyd, A. (1998). Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear, 19, 290-297.
34. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
35. Pittman, A. L., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (2000). Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 1389-1401.
36. Rao, A., Zhang, Y., Miller, S. (2010). Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: An event-related potential study. Hear Res, 268, 123-132.
37. Shahin, A., Roberts, L. E., Pantev, C., et al. (2005). Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds. Neuroreport, 16, 1781-1785.
38. Sharma, A., Marsh, C. M., Dorman, M. F. (2000). Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 3030-3035.
39. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
40. Tavabi, K., Obleser, J., Dobel, C., et al. (2007). Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: An MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing. Eur J Neurosci, 25, 3155-3162.
41. Tremblay, K. L., Billings, C. J., Friesen, L. M., et al. (2006). Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear, 27, 93-103.
42. Tremblay, K. L., Friesen, L., Martin, B. A., et al. (2003). Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear, 24, 225-232.
43. Woods, D. L., & Elmasian, R. (1986). The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 65, 447-459.
44. Zaehle, T., Jancke, L., Meyer, M. (2007). Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features. Behav Brain Funct, 3, 63.
45. Zeng, F. G., & Turner, C. W. (1990). Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 440-449.
46. Zhang, Y., Koerner, T., Miller, S., et al. (2011). Neural coding of formantexaggerated speech in the infant brain. Dev Sci, 14, 566-581.
47. Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., et al. (2005). Effects of language experience: Neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. Neuroimage, 26, 703-720.