Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 459-467

  Billings, Curtis J ^a,b   Tremblay, Kelly L ^c   Miller, Christi W ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR REHABILITATIVE AUDITORY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs); Event related potentials (ERPs); Signals in noise; Signal to noise ratio (SNR); N1; Auditory cortex; Hearing aids; Amplification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958775226     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.568011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adler G. & Adler J. 1989. Infl uence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range. Audiology , 28(6), 316-324 (Pubitemid 19278294)
2. Billings C.J., Tremblay K.L., Souza P.E. & Binns M.A. 2007. Effects of hearing aid amplifi cation and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Neurootol , 12(4), 234-246 (Pubitemid 46878921)
3. Billings C.J., Tremblay K.L., Stecker G.C. & Tolin W.M. 2009. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level. Hear Res , 254(1-2), 15-24
4. Gatehouse S. & Robinson K. 1996. Acclimatisation to monaural hearing aid fi tting: Effects on loudness functions and preliminary evidence for parallel electrophysiological and behavioural effects. In: B. Kollmeier (ed.), Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids. pp. 319-330
5. Golding M., Pearce W., Seymore J., Cooper A., Ching T., et al. 2007. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol , 18, 117-125 (Pubitemid 46505477)
6. Gravel J., Kurtzberg D., Stapells D.R., Vaughan H.G. & Wallace I.F. 1989. Case studies. Semin Hear , 10(3), 272-287 (Pubitemid 19212991)
7. Greenhouse W.W. & Geisser S. 1959. On methods in the analysis of profi le data. Psychometrika , 24, 95-112
8. Kaplan-Neeman R., Kishon-Rabin L., Henkin Y. & Muchnik C. 2006. Identifi cation of syllables in noise: Electrophysiological and behavioral correlates. J Acoust Soc Am , 120(2), 926-933 (Pubitemid 44213704)
9. Korczak P.A., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear , 26(2), 165-185 (Pubitemid 40489327)
10. Kraus N. & McGee T.J. 1994. Mismatch negativity in the assessment of central auditory function. Am J Audio , 3, 39-51
11. Kurtzberg D. 1989. Cortical event-related potentials assessment of auditory system function. Semin Hear , 10, 252-261 (Pubitemid 19212989)
12. Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L. & Korczak P. 2008. Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear , 29 (3), 285-313 (Pubitemid 351681498)
13. Marynewich S.L. 2010. Slow cortical potential measures of amplifi cation. Master of Science Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
14. Naylor G. & Johannesson R.B. 2009. Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems. J Am Acad Audiol , 20, 161-171
15. Onishi S. & Davis H. 1968. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am , 44(2), 582-591
16. Ostroff J.M., Martin B.A. & Boothroyd A. 1998. Cortical evoked responses to spectral change within a syllable. Ear Hear , 19, 290-297 (Pubitemid 28381660)
17. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Baribeau-Braun J., Healey T.M. 1977. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol , 6, 90-119 (Pubitemid 8099729)
18. Purdy S.C., Katsch R., Dillon H., Storey L., Sharma M., et al. 2005. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials for hearing instrument evaluation in infants. In: A. Phonak (ed.), A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplifi cation . Chicago, USA, pp. 115-127
19. Rapin I. & Graziani L.J. 1967. Auditory-evoked responses in normal, brain-damaged, and deaf infants. Neurology , 17(9), 881-894
20. Sharma A., Tobey E., Dorman M., Bharadwaj S., Martin K., et al. 2004. Central auditory maturation and babbling development in infants with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 130(5), 511-516 (Pubitemid 38609657)
21. Skrandies W. 1989. Data reduction of multichannel fi elds: Global fi eld power and principal component analysis. Brain Topogr , 2(1-2), 73-80 (Pubitemid 20172277)
22. Stapells D.R. & Kurtzberg D. 1991. Evoked potential assessment of auditory system integrity in infants. Clin Perinatol , 18(3), 497-518
23. Tremblay K.L., Billings C.J., Friesen L.M. & Souza P.E. 2006a. Neural representation of amplifi ed speech sounds. Ear Hear , 27(2), 93-103 (Pubitemid 44378653)
24. Tremblay K.L., Kalstein L., Billings C.J. & Souza P.E. 2006b. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing aids. Trends Amplif , 10(3), 155-162 (Pubitemid 44215090)
25. Tremblay K., Kraus N., McGee T., Ponton C. & Otis B. 2001. Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear , 22, 79-90 (Pubitemid 32290033)
26. Tremblay K.L., Shahin A.J., Picton T. & Ross B. 2009. Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specifi c cues in humans. Clin Neurophysiol , 120, 128-135
27. Whiting K.A., Martin B.A. & Stapells D.R. 1998. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/and /da. Ear Hear , 19(3), 218-231 (Pubitemid 28285601)
28. Zakis J.A. & Wise C. 2006. The acoustic and perceptual effects of two noisesuppression algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am , 121(1), 433-441