Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 351-361

  Resnik, Linda ^a,b   Borgia, Matthew ^a   Latlief, Gail ^c   Sasson, Nicole ^c   Smurr Walters, Lisa ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputation; Assistive technology; Department of Veterans Affairs; Dexterity; Disability evaluation; Outcomes; Physical function; Prosthetics; Rehabilitation; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PROSTHETICS;

AMPUTATION; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; DEXTERITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; OUTCOMES; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; UPPER LIMBS;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS;

ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEKA ARM; DEXTERITY TEST; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRAINING; AGED; AMPUTATION; ARM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REHABILITATION; SELF REPORT; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMPUTATION; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903268104     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.08.0180     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236-57. [PMID:17979010]
2. Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg Am. 1995; 20(4):619-22. [PMID:7594289]
3. Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(6):346-57. [PMID:19263565] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100701714733
4. Atkins DJ, Heard DC, Donovan WH. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot. 1996;8(1):2-11.
5. Dakpa R, Heger H. Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees. Curr Orthop.1997;11(3):193-202.
6. Reyburn TV. A method of early prosthetics training for upper-extremity amputees. Artif Limbs. 1971;15(2):1-5. [PMID:5135222]
7. Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK, Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123(7):363-66. [PMID:12827395] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0546-4
8. Maguire MT. Empowering prosthetics. Rehab Manag. 2008; 21(10):10. [PMID:19263992]
9. Lake C, Dodson R. Progressive upper limb prosthetics. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006;17(1):49-72. [PMID:16517345] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2005.10.004
10. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008;3(4):181-92. [PMID:19238719] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100701869826
11. Biddiss E, Chau T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(2):71-84. [PMID:19263542] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100601138959
12. Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Oct 22. Epub ahead of print. [PMID:24150930]
13. Defense Sciences Office [Internet]. Revolutionizing prosthetics. Arlington (VA): Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; 2014 [cited 2012 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.darpa.mil/our_work/dso/programs/ revolutionizing_prosthetics.aspx
14. Resnik L, Etter K, Klinger SL, Kambe C. Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upperlimb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):707-18. [PMID:21938657] http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.07.0127
15. Phillips SL, Resnik L, Fantini C, Latlief G. Endpoint control for a powered shoulder prosthesis. J Prosthet Orthot. 2013;25(4):193-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000006
16. Barnum CM. Usability testing and research. New York (NY): Longman; 2002.
17. Resnik L, Latlief G, Klinger SL, Sasson N, Walters LS. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Nov 28. Epub ahead of print. [PMID:24286806]
18. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-55. [PMID:8024419]
19. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-91. [PMID:3160243] http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
20. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404-11. [PMID:15929509] http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
21. Rider B. Comparison of standardized and non-standardized administration of the Jebsen Hand Function Test. J Hand Ther. 1988;1(3):121-23.
22. Resnik L, Adams L, Borgia M, Delikat J, Disla R, Ebner C, Walters LS. Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(3):488-94. [PMID:23085376] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.004
23. Sanderson ER, Scott RN. UNB Test of Prosthetics Function: A test for unilateral upper extremity amputees, ages 2-13. Fredericton (Canada): Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick; 1985.
24. Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, Kotnik S, Giordano A. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(5):393-99. [PMID:18461266] http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0183
25. Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O'Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27(3):191-206. [PMID:14727700] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640308726682
26. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc.47.4.258
27. Resnik L, Borgia M. Reliability and validity of outcome measures for upper limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24(4):192-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e31826ff91c
28. Resnik L, Baxter K, Borgia M, Mathewson K. Is the UNB test reliable and valid for use with adults with upper limb amputation? J Hand Ther. 2013;26(4):353-59, quiz 359. [PMID:24012168] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.06.004
29. Linacre JM. A user's guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1999.
30. Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patientspecific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2):56-65. [PMID:22333510] http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3953
31. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, Stabler M. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77(8):820-29. [PMID:9256870]
32. Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patientspecific functional scale: Validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998; 27(5):331-38. [PMID:9580892] http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331
33. Resnik L, Lieberman-Klinger S, Etter K. User and Clinician Perspectives on DEKA Arm: Results of VA study to optimize DEKA Arm. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.03.0068
34. Resnik L, Meucci MR, Lieberman-Klinger S, Fantini C, Kelty DL, Disla R, Sasson N. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: Implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(4):710-17. [PMID:22464092] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.010