Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Resnik, Linda ^a,b   Adams, Laurel ^c   Borgia, Matthew ^a   Delikat, Jemy ^c   Disla, Roxanne ^d   Ebner, Christopher ^e,f   Walters, Lisa Smurr ^e  

^a PROVIDENCE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^e BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Warrior Transition Battalion Europe   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amputation; Disability evaluation; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES MEASURE FOR UPPER LIMB AMPUTEES SCORE; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SHOULDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; VELOCITY; VIDEOTAPE;

EID: 84875367772     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. V. Wright Measurement of functional outcome with individuals who use upper extremity prosthetic devices: current and future directions J Prosthet Orthot 18 2006 46 56
2. L.A. Miller, and S. Swanson Introduction to the Academy's State of the Science Conference on upper limb prosthetic outcome measures J Prosthet Orthot 21 Suppl 2009 P1 P2
3. W. Hill, O. Stavdahl, and L. Hermansson Functional outcomes in the WHO-ICF model: establishment of the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Group J Prosthet Orthot 21 2009 115 119
4. W. Hill, P. Kyberd, and L.N. Hermansson Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (UPLOM): a working group and their findings J Prosthet Orthot 21 4 Suppl 2009 P69 P82
5. V. Wright Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, 1970 to 2009 J Prosthet Orthot 21 4 Suppl 2009 P3-63
6. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001 World Health Organization Geneva
7. L. Miller, and S. Swanson Summary and recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on upper limb prosthetic outcome measures J Prosthet Orthot 21 4 Suppl 2009 83 89
8. A.W. Heinemann, R.K. Bode, and C. O'Reilly Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments Prosthet Orthot Int 27 2003 191 206
9. P.L. Hudak, P.C. Amadio, and C. Bombardier Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 29 1996 602 608
10. H.Y. Lindner, B.S. Natterlund, and L.M. Hermansson Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Prosthet Orthot Int 34 2010 109 128
11. L.M. Hermansson, L. Bodin, and A.C. Eliasson Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control J Rehabil Med 38 2006 118 123
12. L.M. Hermansson, A.G. Fisher, B. Bernspång, and A.C. Eliasson Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control J Rehabil Med 37 2005 166 171
13. P. Gallagher, F. Franchignoni, A. Giordano, and M. MacLachlan Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and Rasch analysis Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89 2010 487 496
14. L. Resnik Research update: VA study to optimize DEKA arm J Rehabil Res Dev 47 2010 ix x
15. D. Atkins, and R. Meier Comprehensive management of the upper-limb amputee 1989 Springer-Verlag New York
16. L.M. Smurr, K. Gulick, K. Yancosek, and O. Ganz Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success J Hand Ther 21 2008 160 175 quiz 176
17. L. Portney, and M. Watkins Foundations of clinical research applications to practice 1993 Appleton & Lange Stamford
18. D. Streiner, and G. Norman Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2003 Oxford Univ Pr New York
19. K.W. Wyrwich, W.M. Tierney, and F.D. Wolinsky Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 861 873
20. V. Mathiowetz, G. Volland, N. Kashman, and K. Weber Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity Am J Occup Ther 39 1985 386 391
21. R.H. Jebsen, N. Taylor, R.B. Trieschmann, M.J. Trotter, and L.A. Howard An objective and standardized test of hand function Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50 1969 311 319
22. H. Burger, F. Franchignoni, A.W. Heinemann, S. Kotnik, and A. Giordano Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation J Rehabil Med 40 2008 393 399
23. Linacre JM. A user's guide to WINSTEPS, MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago: 2006.
24. K.C. Lin, L.L. Chuang, C.Y. Wu, Y.W. Hsieh, and W.Y. Chang Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation J Rehabil Res Dev 47 2010 563 571