Matchmaking as multi-sided market for open innovation

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 601-615

  Holzmann, Thomas ^a   Sailer, Klaus ^a   Katzy, Bernhard R ^b,c  

^a MUNICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

collaborative innovation; innovation networks; matching process; matchmaking; multi sided market; open innovation; two sided market

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84903266502     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2014.913786     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2001. Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 2: 419-51. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.2.419
2. Bessant, J., and H. Rush. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24, no. 1: 97-114. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
3. Bidault, F., and T. Cummings. 1994. Innovating through alliances: Expectations and limitations. R&D Management 24, no. 1: 33-45.
4. Cesaroni, F. 2004. Technological outsourcing and product diversification: Do markets for technology affect firms' strategies? Research Policy 33, no. 10: 1547-64. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.003
5. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Chesbrough, H.W. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Chesbrough, H.W., and D.J. Teece. 1996. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review January-February: 65-73.
8. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4: 532-50.
9. Evans, D.S. 2003. The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation 20, no. 2: 325.
10. Evans, D.S., and R. Schmalensee. 2005. The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. National Bureau of Economic Research.
11. Galbraith, B., and R. McAdam. 2013. The convergence of ICT, policy, intermediaries and society for technology transfer: Evidence from European innovation projects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, no. 3: 249-52. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.766684
12. Gale, D., and L.S. Shapley. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly 69, no. 1: 9-15. doi: 10.2307/2312726
13. Gassmann, O., and E. Enkel. 2004. Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. Paper presented at the The R&D Management Conference, July 6-9, 2004, Lisbon, Portugal.
14. Hacklin, F., C. Marxt, and F. Fahrni. 2006. Strategic venture partner selection for collaborative innovation in production systems: A decision support system-based approach. International Journal of Production Economics 104, no. 1: 100-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.002
15. Hagiu, A., and J. Wright. 2011. Multi-sided platforms. Working Paper 12-024 ed. Harvard Business School.
16. Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, no. 5: 715-28. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
17. Järvi, K., D. Schallmo, and A. Kutvonen. 2011. The business of open innovation intermediaries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XXII ISPIM Conference: Sustainability in Innovation: Innovation Management Challenges, Hamburg.
18. Katz, M.L., and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review 75, no. 3: 424-40.
19. Katzy, B., and K. Crowston. 2008. Competency rallying for technical innovation - The case of the Virtuelle Fabrik. Technovation 28, no. 10: 679-92. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.003
20. Katzy, B., E. Turgut, T. Holzmann, and K. Sailer. 2013. Innovation intermediaries - A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, no. 3: 295-309. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
21. Klerkx, L., and C. Leeuwis. 2008. Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy 33, no. 3: 260-76. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001
22. Kock, N.F., R.J. McQueen, and J.L. Scott. 1997. Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1, no. 1: 1-24. doi: 10.1108/13287269780000732
23. Littler, D., F. Leverick, and M. Bruce. 1995. Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: A study of UK manufacturers of information and communications technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12, no. 1: 16-32. doi: 10.1016/0737-6782(94)00025-B
24. Lopez, H., and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2009. How innovation intermediaries are shaping the technology market? An analysis of their business model. MPRA Paper.
25. Lopez-Vega, H., and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2009. Connecting open and closed innovation markets: A typology of intermediaries. MPRA Paper.
26. Marxt, C., and P. Link. 2002. Success factors for cooperative ventures in innovation and production systems. International Journal of Production Economics 77, no. 3: 219-29. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00197-9
27. Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
28. Mortensen, D.T. 1988. Matching: Finding a partner for life or otherwise. American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S215-40. doi: 10.1086/228947
29. Mowshowitz, A. 2002. Virtual organization: Toward a theory of societal transformation stimulated by information technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
30. Osborn, R.N., and C.C. Baughn. 1990. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management Journal 33, no. 3: 503-19. doi: 10.2307/256578
31. Parmigiani, A., and M. Rivera-Santos. 2011. Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management 37, no. 4: 1108-36. doi: 10.1177/0149206311407507
32. Powell, W.W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295-336.
33. Remneland-Wikhamn, B., and D. Knights. 2012. Transaction cost economics and open innovation: implications for theory and practice. Creativity and Innovation Management 21, no. 3: 277-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00639.x
34. Ring, P.S., and A.H. Van de Ven. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19, no. 1: 90-118.
35. Rochet, J.-C., and J. Tirole. 2004. Two-sided markets: An overview. Institut d'Economie Industrielle working paper.
36. Rochet, J.-C., and J. Tirole. 2006. Two-sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics 37, no. 3: 645-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
37. Roth, A.E. 2002. The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70, no. 4: 1341-78. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00335
38. Roth, A.E. 2008. What have we learned from market design? The Economic Journal 118, no. 527: 285-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02121.x
39. Roth, A.E., T. Sönmez, and M.U. Ünver. 2005. A kidney exchange clearinghouse in New England. American Economic Review: 376-80. doi: 10.1257/000282805774669989
40. Roth, A.E., T. Sönmez, and M.U. Ünver. 2007. Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility-based preferences. The American Economic Review: 828-51. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.3.828
41. Roth, A.E., and M.A.O. Sotomayor. 1990. Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Rothaermel, F.T. 2002. Technological discontinuities and interfirm cooperation: what determines a startup's attractiveness as alliance partner? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49, no. 4: 388-97. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2002.806725
43. Rysman, M. 2009. The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economics Perspectives 23, no. 3: 125-43. doi: 10.1257/jep.23.3.125
44. Sieg, J.H., M.W. Wallin, and G. von Krogh. 2010. Managerial challenges in open innovation: A study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry. R&D Management 40, no. 3: 281-91.
45. Spulber, D.F. 1999. Market microstructure: Intermediaries and the theory of the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Spulber, D.F. 2003. The intermediation theory of the firm: Integrating economic and management approaches to strategy. Managerial and Decision Economics 24, no. 4: 253-266. doi: 10.1002/mde.1120
47. Susman, G.I., and R.D. Evered. 1978. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23, no. 4: 582-603. doi: 10.2307/2392581
48. Sydow, J. 1992. Strategische netzwerke - evolution und organization. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
49. Tietze, F. 2012. Technology market transactions - auctions, intermediaries and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
50. Van de Ven, A.H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Veit, D. 2003. Matchmaking in electronic markets - an agent-based approach towards matchmaking in electronic negotiations. Berlin: Springer.
52. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.
53. Wright, J. 2004. One-sided logic in two-sided markets. Review of Network Economics 3, no. 1: 44-64. doi: 10.2202/1446-9022.1042