Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach

Journal of Systems and Information Technology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-23

  Kock, Nereu F ^a   Mcqueen, Robert J ^a   John, cott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Action research; Brazil; Information systems research; Positivism; Research rigour

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037983497     PISSN: 13287265     EISSN: 17588847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13287269780000732     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Alavi, M. (1993), An Assessment of Electronic Meeting Systems in a Corporate Setting. Information & Management, 25(4), pp. 175-182.
2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Smith, D.M. (1985), Action Science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Berkowitz, L. and Donnerstein, E. (1982), External Validity is More Than Skin Deep: Some Answers to Criticisms of Laboratory Experiments. American Psychologist, 37(3), pp. 245-257.
4. Brown, L.D. (1993), Social Change Through Collective Reflection with Asian Nongovernmental Development Organizations. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 249-273.
5. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1993), Is Information Systems Spending Productive? New Evidence and New Results. In J.I. Degross, R.P. Bostrom and D. Robey (Eds), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Systems. New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 47-64.
6. Candlin, D.B. and Wright, S. (1991), Managing the Introduction of Expert Systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12(1), pp. 46-59.
7. Cash Jr. J.I. and Lawrence, P.R. (Eds) (1989), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Qualitative Research Methods. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
8. Checkland, P. (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Chidambaram, L. and Jones, B. (1993), Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 465-491.
10. Coleman, D. (Ed) (1992), Proceedings of Groupware '92 Conference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1976), Four Kinds of Validity. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 224-246.
12. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S., Dickson, G.W. and Jackson, B.M. (1993), Interpretive Analysis of Team Use of Group Technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(1), pp. 1-29.
13. Doolin, B. (1995), Alternative Views of Case Research in Information Systems. In G. Pervan and M. Newby (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Perth, Australia: School of Information Systems, Curtin University, pp. 767-777.
14. Elden, M. and Chisholm, R.F. (1993), Emerging Varieties of Action Research. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 121-141.
15. Engelstad, P.H. and Gustavsen, B. (1993), Swedish Network Development for Implementing National Work Reform Strategy. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 219-248.
16. Fox, W.M. (1990), An Interview with Eric Trist, Father of the Sociotechnical Systems Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 26(2), pp. 259-279.
17. Francis, D. (1991), Moving from Non-Interventionist Research to Participatory Action. In C. Collins & P. Chippendale (Eds), Proceedings of The First World Congress on Action Research, V.2. Sunnybank Hills, Australia: Acorn, pp. 31-42.
18. Galliers, R.D. (1984), In Search of a Paradigm for Information Systems Research. In E. Mumford et al. (Eds), Research Methods in Information Systems. New York, NY: North-Holland, pp. 281-297.
19. Gallupe, R.B., Cooper, W.H., Grise, M. and Bastianutti, L.M. (1994), Blocking Electronic Brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), pp. 77-86.
20. Gioia, D.A. and Sims Jr., H.P. (1986), Social Cognition in Organizations. In H.P. Sims Jr. and D.A. Gioia (Eds), The Thinking Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1-48.
21. Greenwood, D.J., Whyte, W.F. and Harkavy, I. (1993), Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 175-191.
22. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 105-117.
23. Gustavsen, B. (1993), Action Research and the Generation of Knowledge. Human Relations, 46(11), pp. 1361-1365.
24. Harvey, L.J. and Myers, M.D. (1995), Scholarship and Practice: The Contribution of Ethnographic Research Methods to Bridging the Gap. Information Technology & People, 8(3), pp. 13-27.
25. Heller, F. (1993), Another Look at Action Research. Human Relations, 46(10), pp. 1235-1242.
26. Hirschheim, R.A. (1985), Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective. In E. Mumford et al (Eds), Research Methods in Information Systems. New York, NY: North-Holland, pp. 13-35.
27. Jick, T.D. (1979), Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, December, pp. 602-611.
28. Jonsonn, S. (1991), Action Research. In H. Nissen, H.K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. New York, NY: North-Holland, pp. 371-396.
29. Ketchum, L.D. and Trist, E. (1992), All Teams are not Created Equal. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Kock Jr., N.F. (1994), MultiMail: A Computer Tool to Support Asynchronous Group Interaction. In D. Wollman (Ed), Proceedings of the Mercosul Software Conference, New Technologies Track. Curitiba, Brazil: SUCESU-PR, 20 pp. (in Portuguese).
31. Kock Jr., N.F. and McQueen, R.J. (1995), Integrating Groupware Technology into a Business Process Improvement Framework. Information Technology & People, 8(4), pp. 19-34.
32. Kock Jr., N.F. and Corner, J.L. (1996), Myths in Organisational Action Research: Reflections on a Study of Computer-Supported Process Redesign Groups. Research Report No. 1996-4, Hamilton, New Zealand: Dept. of Management Systems, University of Waikato.
33. Ledford, G.E. and Mohrman, S.A. (1993), Self-Design for High Involvement: A Large-Scale Organizational Change. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 143-173.
34. Ledford, G.E. and Susan, A.M. (1993), Looking Backward and Forward at Action Research: Reply Paper. Human Relations, 46(11), pp. 1349-1359.
35. Ledford, G.E. and Susan, A.M. (1993a), Looking Backward and Forward at Action Research. Human Relations, 46(1), pp. 143-173.
36. Levin, M. (1993), Creating Networks for Rural Economic Development in Norway. Human Relations, 46(2), pp. 193-218.
37. Lewin, K. (1946), Action Research and Minority Problems. In G.W. Lewin (Ed), Resolving Social Conflicts. New York, NY: Harper & Row, pp. 201-216.
38. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. McTaggart, R. (1991), Principles for Participatory Action Research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), pp. 168-187.
39. Mintzberg, H. (1979), An Emerging Strategy of “Direct” Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), pp. 582-589.
40. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991), Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), pp. 1-28.
41. Peters, M. and Robinson, V. (1984), The Origins and Status of Action Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(2), pp. 113-124.
42. Rapoport, R.N. (1970), Three Dilemmas in Action Research. Human Relations, 23(6), pp. 499-513.
43. Reason, P. (1988), The Co-operative Inquiry Group. In P. Reason (Ed), Human Inquiry in Action. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 18-39.
44. Reason, P. (1993), Sitting Between Appreciation and Disappointment: A Critique of the Special Edition of Human Relations on Action Research. Human Relations, 46(10), pp. 1253-1270.
45. Reason, P. (1994), Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 324-329.
46. Sims Jr., H.P. and Lorenzi, P. (1992), The New Leadership Paradigm: Social Learning and Cognition in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Sommer, R. (1987), An Experimental Investigation of the Action Research Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(2), pp. 185-199.
48. Sommer, R. (1994), Serving Two Masters. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 28(1), pp. 170-187.
49. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Susman G.I. and. Evered, R.D. (1978), An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, December, pp. 582-603.
51. Teichman, J. and Evans, K.C. (1995), Philosophy: A Beginner's Guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
52. Tesch, R. (1990), Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
53. Trauth, E.M. and O'Connor, B. (1991), A Study of the Interaction Between Information Technology and Society: An Ilustration of Combined Qualitative Research Methods. In H. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. New York, NY: North-Holland, pp. 131-143.
54. Vidich, A.J. and Lyman, S.M. (1994), Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 23-59.
55. Walker, R. (1993), An Introduction to Applied Qualitative Research. In R. Walker (Ed), Applied Qualitative Research. Aldershot, UK: Gower, pp. 3-26.
56. Whyte, W.F., Greenwood, D.J. and Lazes, P. (1991), Participatory Action Research: Through Practice to Science in Social Research. In W.F. Whyte (Ed), Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 19-55.
57. Winter, S.J. (1993), The Symbolic Potential of Computer Technology: Differences Among White-Collar Workers. In J.I. Degross, R.P. Bostrom and D. Robey (Eds), Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 331-344.
58. Woofford, J.C. (1994), Getting Inside the Leader's Head: A Cognitive Processes Approach to Leadership. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 59(3), pp. 4-9.
59. Yin, R.K. (1989), Research Design Issues in Using the Case Study Method to Study Management Information Systems. In J.I. Cash and P.R. Lawrence (Eds), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Qualitative Research Methods. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, pp. 1-6.
60. Yin, R. K. (1994), Case Study Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.