Winning the Silicon sweepstakes: Can the United States compete in global telecommunications?

Winning the Silicon Sweepstakes: Can the United States Compete in Global Telecommunications?

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-409

  Frieden, Rob ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903231135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (287)

1. Robert D. Atkinson, The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, The Case for a National Broadband Policy (June 2007), http://www.itif.org/files/CaseForNationalBroadbandPolicy.pdf.
2. Leonard M. Baynes, "The Mercedes Divide?"-American Segregation Shapes the Color of Electronic Commerce, 29 W. NEW ENG. L. Rev. 165 (2006).
3. Benjamin W. Cramer, "The Nation's Broadband Success Story": The Secrecy of FCC Broadband Infrastructure Statistics, 31 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT L.J. 339 (Spring 2009).
4. Rob Frieden, Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics: Developing a Clearer Assessment of Market Penetration and Broadband Competition in the United States, 14 VA. J.L. & TECH. 100 (Summer 2009), http://www.vjolt.net/vol14/issue2/v14i2e100%20-%20Frieden.pdf.
5. International Telecommunication Union, Measuring the Information Society-The ICT Development Index (2009).
6. Jennifer A. Manner, Achieving the Goal of Universal Access to Telecommunications Services Globally, 13 COMM. L. CONSPECTUS 85 (2004).
7. Philip M. Napoli, Toward a Federal Data Agenda for Communications Policymaking, 16 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 53 (2007).
8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD Broadband Portal, http://Www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband
9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Future of the Internet Economy: A Statistical Profile (June 2008), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/56/40827598.pdf
10. Tramanh Phi, Duopolies, Restrictions, and Content Regulation: How Much Access Are We Really Getting from Broadband Internet Access? 47 SANTA CLARA L. Rev. 347 (2007).
11. Edward J. Sholinsky, Blocking Access to the Information Superhighway: Regulating the Internet Out of the Reach of Low-Income Americans, 38 RUTGERS L.J. 321 (Fall 2006).
12. Hannibal Travis, Of Blogs, Ebooks, and Broadband: Access to Digital Media as a First Amendment Right, 35 HOFSTRA L. Rev. 1519 (Spring 2007).
13. Richard S. Whitt, Evolving Broadband Policy: Taking Adaptive Stances to Foster Optimal Internet Platforms 17 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 417 (2009).
14. John Windhausen, Educause, A Blueprint for Big Broadband (Jan. 2008), http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EPO0801.pdf.
15. Junseong An, Korean DSL Policy: Implications for the United States, 20 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 417 (Spring 2002).
16. Bob Bell, Broadband Deregulation-Similar Legislation, Different Results: A Comparative Look at the United States and the European Union, 10 TUL. J. TECH. & IN-TELL. PROP. 77 (Fall 2007).
17. Timothy J. Brennan, Skating Toward Deregulation: Canadian Developments, 60 FED. COMM. L.J. 325 (Mar. 2008).
18. Susan P. Crawford, Transporting Communications, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 871 (June 2009).
19. Nicholas P. Dickerson, What Makes the Internet So Special? And Why, Where, How, and By Whom Should Its Content Be Regulated? 46 HOUS. L. Rev. 61 (2009).
20. Donna Coleman Gregg, Lessons Learned from the Spectrum Wars: Views on the United States' Effort Going Into and Coming Out of a World Radiocommunication Conference, 17 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 377 (2009).
21. Sandra C. Lee, WIMAX in Africa: A New Frontier, 15 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 517 (2007).
22. Tilman Lüder, The Next Ten Years in E.U. Copyright: Making Markets Work, 18 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1 (Autumn 2007).
23. Patrick S. Ryan, European Spectrum Management Principles, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 277 (Winter 2005).
24. D. Daniel Sokol, The European Mobile 3G UMTS Process: Lessons from the Spectrum Auctions and Beauty Contests, 6 VA. J. L. & TECH. 17 (Fall 2001).
25. Oliver Solano, Challenges to the Effective Implementation of Competition Policy in Regulated Sectors: The Case of Telecommunications in Mexico, 26 NW. J. INT'L L. & BUS. 527 (2006).
26. Ashutosh Bhagwat, Unnatural Competition? Applying the New Antitrust Learning to Foster Competition in the Local Exchange, 50 HASTINGS L.J. 1479 (Aug. 1999).
27. Timothy J. Brennan, Bundled Rebates as Exclusion Rather Than Predation, 4 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 335 (June 2008).
28. Adam Candeub, Trinko and Re-grounding the Refusal to Deal Doctrine, 66 U. PITT. L. Rev. 821 (Summer 2005).
29. Gregory S. Cooper, A Tangled Web We Weave: Enforcing International Speech Restrictions in an Online World, 8 U. PITT. J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 2 (Fall 2007).
30. Daniel A. Crane, Technocracy and Antitrust, 86 TEX. L. Rev. 1159 (May 2008).
31. Stacey L. Dogan & Mark A. Lemley, Antitrust Law and Regulatory Gaming, 87 TEX. L. Rev. 685 (Mar. 2009).
32. William J. Drake & Ernest J. Wilson III, eds., Governing Global Electronic Networks- International Perspectives on Policy and Power (MIT Press, 2008).
33. Nicholas Economides, Hit and Miss: Leverage, Sacrifice, and Refusal to Deal in the Supreme Court Decision in Trinko, 10 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 121 (Fall 2007).
34. David S. Evans, Antitrust Issues Raised by the Emerging Global Internet Economy, 102 NW. U. L. Rev. 285 (Apr. 28, 2008).
35. Brett Frischmann, Revitalizing Essential Facilities, 75 ANTITRUST L.J. 1 (2008).
36. Damien Geradin, The Concurrent Application of Competition Law and Regulation: The Case of Margin Squeeze Abuses in the Telecommunications Sector, 1 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 355 (June 2005).
37. Erik N. Hovenkamp & Herbert Hovenkamp, The Viability of Antitrust Price Squeeze Claims, 51 ARIZ. L. Rev. 273 (Summer 2009).
38. Michel Kerf & Damien Geradin, Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector-Specific Regulation-An Assessment of the United States, New Zealand and Australian Experiences, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 919 (Fall 1999).
39. Marina Lao, Networks, Access, and "Essential Facilities": From Terminal Railroad to Microsoft, 62 SMU L. Rev. 557 (Spring 2009).
40. Paul W. MacAvoy, An Oligopoly Analysis of At&T's Performance in the Wireline Long Distance Markets After Divestiture, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 31 (Dec. 2008).
41. Douglas Melamed, Exclusionary Conduct Under the Antitrust Laws: Balancing, Sacrifice, and Refusals to Deal, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1247 (Spring 2005).
42. Michele Polo, Price Squeeze: Lessons from the Telecom Italia Case, 3 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 453 (Sept. 2007).
43. Glen O. Robinson, On Refusing to Deal with Rivals, 87 CORNELL L. Rev. 1177 (July 2002).
44. Frank X. Schoen, Exclusionary Conduct After Trinko, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1625 (Nov. 2005).
45. Daniel F. Spulber, Mandating Access to Telecom and the Internet: The Hidden Side of Trinko, 107 COLUM. L. Rev. 1822 (Dec. 2007).
46. Maurice E. Stucke, Should the Government Prosecute Monopolies? 2009 U. ILL. L. Rev. 497.
47. Hannibal Travis, Wi-Fi Everywhere: Universal Broadband Access as Antitrust and Telecommunications Policy, 55 AM. U. L. Rev. 1697 (Aug. 2006).
48. Spencer Weber Waller, Areeda, Epithets, and Essential Facilities, 2008 WIS. L. Rev. 359.
49. Tim Wu, Why Have a Telecommunications Law? Antidiscrimination Norms in Communications, 5 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 15 (2006).
50. Andrew William Bagley, Fair Use Rights in a World of the Broadcast Flag and Digital Rights Management: Do Consumers Have a Chance? 18 U. FLA. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 115 (Apr. 2007).
51. Dan L. Burk, Legal and Technical Standards in Digital Rights Management Technology, 74 FORDHAM L. Rev. 537, (2005).
52. Julie E. Cohen, Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory, 40 U.C. DAVIS L. Rev. 1151 (2007).
53. Michael A. Einhorn, Digitization and Its Discontents: Digital Rights Management, Access Protection, and Free Markets, 51 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 279 (Winter 2004).
54. Rob Frieden, Internet Packet Sniffing and Its Impact on the Network Neutrality Debate and the Balance of Power Between Intellectual Property Creators and Consumers, 18 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 633 (Spring 2008).
55. Brett M. Frischmann, An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management, 89 MINN. L. Rev. 917 (2005).
56. James Gibson, Once and Future Copyright, 81 NOTRE DAME L. Rev. 167 (Nov. 2005).
57. Dave Hauser, The DMCA and the Privatization of Copyright, 30 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT L.J. 339 (Winter 2008).
58. Bill D. Herman, Breaking and Entering My Own Computer: The Contest of Copyright Metaphors, 13 COMM. L. & POL'Y 231 (Spring 2008).
59. Amy Kapczynski, The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property, 117 YALE L.J. 804 (Mar. 2008).
60. Hyangsun Lee, The Audio Broadcast Flag System-Can It Be a Solution? 12 COMM. L. & POL'Y 405 (Autumn 2007).
61. Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, 83 TEX. L. Rev. 1031 (2005).
62. Mark A. Lemley & R. Anthony Reese, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 STAN. L. Rev. 1345 (2004).
63. Mark A. Lemley & Philip J. Weiser, Should Property Rules or Liability Rules Govern Information? 85 TEX. L. Rev. 783 (2007).
64. Jessica Litman, Lawful Personal Use, 85 TEX. L. Rev. 1871 (June 2007).
65. Brette G. Meyers, Filtering Systems or Fair Use? A Comparative Analysis of Proposed Regulations For User-Generated, 26 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 935 (2009).
66. Neil Weinstock Netanel, Temptations of the Walled Garden: Digital Rights Management and Mobile Phone Carriers, 6 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 77 (Fall 2007).
67. Henry H. Perritt, New Architectures for Music: Law Should Get Out of the Way, 29 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT L.J. 259 (Spring 2007).
68. Joel Reidenberg, The Rule of Intellectual Property Law in the Internet Economy, 44 HOUS. L. Rev. 1073 (2007).
69. Joseph D. Schleimer, Protecting Copyrights at the "Backbone" Level of the Internet, 15 UCLA ENT. L. Rev. 139 (Summer 2008).
70. Rebecca Tushnet, User-Generated Discontent: Transformation in Practice, 31 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 497 (Summer 2008).
71. Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, Communications' Copyright Policy, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 97 (Fall 2005).
72. Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, Distributive Values in Copyright, 83 TEX. L. Rev. 1535 (May 2005).
73. John M. Williamson, Rights Management in Digital Media Content: A Case for FCC Intervention in the Standardization Process, 3 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 309 (Spring 2005).
74. Brian T. Yeh, Congressional Research Service, Copyright Protection of Digital Television: The Broadcast Video Flag, CRS Report to Congress (Jan. 11, 2007), http://ipmall.info/hostederesources/crs/RL33797-070111.pdf
75. Christopher S. Yoo, Copyright and Public Good Economics: A Misunderstood Relation, 155 U. PA. L. Rev. 635 (Jan. 2007).
76. Peter K. Yu, The Escalating Copyright Wars, 32 HOFSTRA L. Rev. 907 (Spring 2004
77. Peter K. Yu, P2P and the Future of Private Copying, 76 COL. L. Rev. 653 (Summer 2005).
78. Robert C. Atkinson, Telecom Regulation for the 21st Century: Avoiding Gridlock, Adapting to Change, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 379 (Spring 2006).
79. William P. Barr, The Gild That Is Killing the Lily: How Confusion over Regulatory Takings Doctrine Is Undermining the Core Protections of the Takings Clause, 73 GEO. WASH. L. Rev. 429 (Apr. 2005).
80. T. Randolph Beard, Why ADCO? Why Now? An Economic Exploration into the Future of Industry Structure for the "Last Mile" in Local Telecommunications Markets, 54 FED. COMM. L.J. 421 (May 2002).
81. Gerald W. Brock, Interconnection Policy and Technological Progress, 58 FED. COMM. L.J. 445 (June 2006).
82. Stuart Buck, TELRIC vs. Universal Service: A Takings Violation? 56 FED. COMM. L.J. 1 (Dec. 2003).
83. Adam Candeub, Network Interconnection and Takings, 54 SYRACUSE L. Rev. 369 (2004).
84. Jim Chen, The Death of the Regulatory Compact: Adjusting Prices and Expectations in the Law of Regulated Industries, 67 OHIO ST. L.J. 1265 (2006).
85. Jim Chen, The Nature of the Public Utility: Infrastructure, the Market, and the Law, 98 NW. U. L. Rev. 1617 (Summer 2004)
86. Eric R. Claeys, The Telecommunications Act of 1996, The Takings Clause, and Tensions in Property Theory, 22 YALE J. ON REG. 205 (Summer 2005).
87. Robert W. Crandall, The Remedy for the "Bottleneck Monopoly" in Telecom: Isolate It, Share It, or Ignore It? 72 U. CHI. L. Rev. 3 (Winter 2005).
88. Robert W. Crandall & Leonard Waverman, The Failure of Competitive Entry into Fixed-Line Telecommunications: Who Is at Fault? 2 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 113 (Mar. 2006).
89. Nicholas Economides, Hit and Miss: Leverage, Sacrifice, and Refusal to Deal in the Supreme Court Decision in Trinko, 10 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 121 (Fall 2007).
90. Jerry Ellig, Costs and Consequences of Federal Telecommunications Regulations, 58 FED. COMM. L.J. 37 (2006).
91. Jerry Ellig, What Did the Unbundled Network Element Platform Cost? 14 COMM-LAW CONSPECTUS 1 (2005).
92. Richard A. Epstein, Takings, Commons, and Associations: Why the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Misfired, 22 YALE J. ON REG. 315 (Summer 2005).
93. Gerald R. Faulhaber, Cross-Subsidy Analysis with More Than Two Services, 1 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 441 (Sept. 2005).
94. Gerald R. Faulhaber, Will Access Regulation Work? 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 37 (Dec. 2008).
95. George S. Ford & Lawrence J. Spiwak, The Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies, The Positive Effects of Unbundling on Broadband Deployment, Policy Paper No. 19 (2004), http://www.phoenix-center.org/pcpp/PCPP19Final.pdf.
96. David Gabel & David I. Rosenbaum, Who's Taking Whom? Some Comments and Evidence on the Constitutionality of TELRIC, 52 FED. COMM. L.J. 239 (Summer 2000).
97. Douglas A. Galbi, Transforming the Structure of Network Interconnection and Transport, 8 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 203 (Summer 2000).
98. David Gilo, A Market-Based Approach to Telecom Interconnection, 77 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (Nov. 2003).
99. Jerry A. Hausman & J. Gregory Sidak, A Consumer-Welfare Approach to the Mandatory Unbundling of Telecommunications Networks, 109 YALE L.J. 417 (Dec. 1999).
100. Jerry Hausman & J. Gregory Sidak, Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries, 1 J. COMP.L. & ECON. 173 (2005).
101. Thomas Hazlett, Rivalrous Telecommunications Networks With and Without Mandatory Sharing, 58 FED. COMM. L.J. 477 (2006).
102. Michael A. Heller, The UNE Anticommons: Why the 1996 Telecom Reforms Blocked Innovation and Investment, 22 YALE J. ON REG. 275 (Summer 2005).
103. Allan T. Ingraham, Mandatory Unbundling, UNE-P, and the Cost of Equity: Does TELRIC Pricing Increase Risk for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers? 22 YALE J. ON REG. 389 (Summer 2003).
104. Michael J. Legg, Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC-Telecommunications Access Pricing and Regulator Accountability Through Administrative Law and Takings Jurisprudence, 56 FED. COMM. L.J. 563 (May 2004).
105. Nirali Patel, FCC Broadband Policy: More Power for the Bell Monopolies, 55 ADMIN. L. Rev. 393 (Spring 2003).
106. Tramanh Phi, Duopolies, Restrictions, and Content Regulation: How Much Access Are We Really Getting from Broadband Internet Access? 7 SANTA CLARA L. Rev. 347 (2007).
107. Harvey Reiter, The Contrasting Policies of the FCC and FERC Regarding the Importance of Open Transmission Networks in Downstream Competitive Markets, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 243 (May 2002).
108. J. Steven Rich, Brand X and the Wireline Broadband Report and Order: The Beginning of the End of the Distinction Between Title I and Title II Services, 58 FED. COMM. L.J., No. 2, 221 (Apr. 2006).
109. Howard A. Shelanski, Adjusting Regulation to Competition: Toward a New Model for U.S. Telecommunications Policy, 24 YALE J. ON REG. 55 (Winter 2007).
110. James B. Speta, Deregulating Telecommunications in Internet Time, 61 WASH. & LEE L. Rev. 1063 (Summer 2004).
111. Daniel F. Spulber, Access to Networks: Economic and Constitutional Connections, 88 CORNELL L. Rev. 885 (May 2003).
112. Daniel F. Spulber, Network Regulation: The Many Faces of Access, 1 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 635 (Dec. 2005).
113. John Thorne, Discounted Bundling by Dominant Firms, 13 GEO. MASON L. Rev. 339 (Winter 2005).
114. Kevin Werbach, The Federal Computer Commission, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (Dec. 2005).
115. Keven Werbach, Only Connect, 22 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1233 (Fall 2007).
116. Barry M. Leiner, Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts & Stephen Wolff, A Brief History of the Internet (Internet Society, 2003), http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.html
117. Jonathan Zittrain, A History of Online Gatekeeping, 19 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 253 (Spring 2006).
118. Ethan Zuckerman & Andrew McLaughlin, Introduction to Internet Architecture and Institutions (Aug. 2003), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/digitaldemocracy/internetarchitecture.html
119. Steven Aronowitz, Brand X Internet Services v. FCC: The Case of the Missing Policy Argument, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 887 (2005).
120. Julie E. Cohen, Cyberspace as/and Space, 107 COLUM. L. Rev. 210 (2007)
121. Rob Frieden, Neither Fish Nor Fowl: New Strategies for Selective Regulation of Information Services, 6 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L., No. 2, 373 (2008).
122. Brett Frischmann, Cultural Environmentalism and the Wealth of Networks, 74 U. CHI. L. Rev. 1083+1096 (2007).
123. William D. Rahm, Watching Over the Web: A Substantive Equality Regime for Broadband Applications, 24 YALE J. ON REG. 1 (Winter 2007).
124. Kevin Werbach, The Centripetal Network: How the Internet Holds Itself Together, and the Forces Tearing It Apart, 42 U.C. DAVIS L. Rev. 343 (2008).
125. Jonathan L. Zittrain, The Generative Internet, 119 HARV. L. Rev. 1974 (2006).
126. Jeffrey Cobia, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process, 10 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 387 (Winter 2009).
127. Amanda Groover Hyland, The Taming of the Internet: A New Approach to Third-Party Internet Defamation, 31 HASTINGS COMM & ENT.L.J. 79 (Fall 2008).
128. Matthew G. Jeweler, The Communications Decency Act of 1996: Why § 230 Is Outdated and Publisher Liability for Defamation Should Be Reinstated Against Internet Service Providers, 8 U. PITT. J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 3 (2007).
129. Seth F. Kreimer, Censorship by Proxy: The First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link, 155 U. PA. L. Rev. 11 (2006).
130. Mark A. Lemley, Rationalizing Internet Safe Harbors, 6 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 101 (2007).
131. Tara E. Lynch, Good Samaritan or Defamation Defender? Amending the Communications Decency Act to Correct the Misnomer of Section 230 Without Expanding ISP Liability, 19 SYRACUSE SCI. & TECH. L. REP. 1 (Fall 2008).
132. Robert G. Magee, Information Conduits or Content Developers? Determining Whether News Portals Should Enjoy Blanket Immunity from Defamation Suits, 12 COMM. L. & POL'Y 369 (Autumn 2007).
133. Wolfgang McGavran, Picking Roommates on the Internet: Matching Roommates Online and Losing Communications Decency Act Immunity in the Process, 11 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 139 (Fall 2008).
134. Aaron K. Perzanowski, Rethinking Anticircumvention' s Interoperability Policy, 42 U.C. DAVIS L. Rev. 1549 (2009).
135. Rebecca Tushnet, Power Without Responsibility: Intermediaries and the First Amendment, 76 GEO. WASH. L. Rev. 986 (2008).
136. Colette Vogele & Ilana Sabes, Attention Web Site Operators: Be Certain You Qualify for § 230 Protection, 5 J. INTERNET L. 1 (2008).
137. Cecilia Ziniti, The Optimal Liability System for Online Service Providers: How Zeran v. America Online Got It Right and Web 2.0 Proves It, 23 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 583 (2008).
138. Enrique Armijo, Public Airwaves, Private Mergers: Analyzing the FCC's Faulty Justifications for the 2003 Media Ownership Rule Changes, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1482 (2004).
139. C. Edwin Baker, Media Concentration: Giving Up on Democracy, 54 FLA. L. Rev. 839 (2002).
140. C. Edwin Baker, Viewpoint Diversity and Media Ownership, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 651 (June 2009).
141. Jerome A. Barron, Access to the Media-A Contemporary Appraisal, 35 HOFSTRA L. Rev. 937 (Spring 2007).
142. Sandra Braman, The Ideal v. the Real in Media Localism: Regulatory Implications, 12 COMM. L. & POL'Y 231 (Summer 2007).
143. Sandra Braman, Where Has Media Policy Gone? Defining the Field in the Twenty-first Century, 9 COMM. L. & POL'Y 153 (Spring 2004).
144. Adam Candeub, Media Ownership Regulation, The First Amendment, and Democracy's Future, 41 U.C. DAVIS L. Rev. 1547 (2008).
145. Daniel A. Farber, Access and Exclusion Rights in Electronic Media: Complex Rules for a Complex World, 33 N. KY. L. Rev. 459 (2006).
146. Ellen P. Goodman, Media Policy out of the Box: Content Abundance, Attention Scarcity, and the Failures of Digital Markets, 19 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1389 (2004).
147. Daniel E. Ho & Kevin M. Quinn, The Role of Theory and Evidence in Media Regulation and Law: A Response to Baker and a Defense of Empirical Legal Studies, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 673 (2009).
148. Daniel E. Ho & Kevin M. Quinn, Viewpoint Diversity and Media Consolidation: An Empirical Study, 61 STAN. L. Rev. 781 (2009).
149. Sean Michael McGuire, Media Influence and the Modern American Democracy: Why the First Amendment Compels Regulation of Media Ownership, 4 CARDOZO PUB. L. POL'Y & ETHICS J. 689 (2006).
150. Christa Corrine McLintock, The Destruction of Media Diversity, or: How the FCC Learned to Stop Regulating and Love Corporate Dominated Media, 22 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 569 (Spring 2004).
151. Philip M. Napoli & Sheea T. Sybblis, Access to Audiences as a First Amendment Right: Its Relevance and Implications for Electronic Media Policy, 12 VA. J.L. & TECH 1 (2007).
152. Maria Simone & Jan Fernback, Invisible Hands or Public Spheres? Theoretical Foundations for U.S. Broadcast Policy, 11 COMM. L. & POL'Y 287, No. 2 (2006).
153. John F. Sturm, Time for Change on Media Cross-Ownership Regulation, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 201 (2005).
154. Adam Thierer, Why Regulate Broadcasting? Toward a Consistent First Amendment Standard for the Information Age, 15 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 431 (2007).
155. Anthony E. Varona, Out of Thin Air: Using First Amendment Public Forum Analysis to Redeem American Broadcasting Regulation, 39 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 149 (1996).
156. Marvin Ammori, Beyond Content Neutrality: Understanding Content-Based Promotion of Democratic Speech, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 273 (2009).
157. Dan G. Barry, The Effect of Video Franchising Reform on Net Neutrality: Does the Beginning of IP Convergence Mean That It Is Time for Net Neutrality Regulation? 24 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 421 (2008).
158. T. Randolph Beard, Network Neutrality and Industry Structure, 29 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT L.J. 149 (Winter 2007).
159. Jerry Brito, A Tale of Two Commissions: Net Neutrality and Regulatory Analysis, 16 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 1 (2007).
160. Barbara A. Cherry, Misusing Network Neutrality to Eliminate Common Carriage Threatens Free Speech and the Postal System, 33 N. KY. L. Rev. 483 (2006).
161. Larry F. Darby, Consumer Welfare, Capital Formation and Net Neutrality: Paying for Next Generation Broadband Networks, 16 MEDIA L. & POL'Y 122 (Summer 2007).
162. Rob Frieden, Internet 3.0: Identifying Problems and Solutions to the Network Neutrality Debate, 1 INT'L J. OF COMM., 461 (2007), http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/160/86.
163. Rob Frieden, Network Neutrality or Bias? Handicapping the Odds for a Tiered and Branded Internet, 29 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J., No. 2, 171 (2007).
164. Brett Frischmann & Barbara van Schewick, Yoo's Frame and What It Ignores: Network Neutrality and the Economics of an Information Superhighway, 47 JURIMETRICS J. 383 (2007).
165. Bill D. Herman, Opening Bottlenecks: On Behalf of Mandated Network Neutrality, 59 FED. COMM. L.J. 103 (2006)
166. Justin Hurwitz, Neighbor Billing and Network Neutrality, 11 VA. J.L. & TECH. 9 (Fall 2006).
167. William G. Laxton, The End of Net Neutrality, 2006 DUKE L. & TECH. Rev. 15 (July 18, 2006).
168. Mark A. Lemley & Lawrence Lessig, The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 925 (2001).
169. Lawrence Lessig, In Support of Network Neutrality, I/S: J. L. & POL'Y FOR INFO. SOC'Y 185 (Spring 2007).
170. Robert E. Litan, Unintended Consequences of Net Neutrality Regulation, 5 J. TELE-COMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 533 (Spring 2007).
171. Christopher T. Marsden, Net Neutrality: The European Debate, 12 J. INTERNET L. 1 (2008).
172. Randolph J. May, Net Neutrality Mandates: Neutering the First Amendment in the Digital Age, I/S: J. L. & POL'Y FOR INFO. SOC'Y 197 (Spring 2007).
173. Craig McTaggart, Was the Internet Ever Neutral? Paper presented at the 34th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, Virginia (Sept. 30, 2006), http://web.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2006/593/mctaggart-tprc06rev.pdf.
174. Sascha D. Meinrath & Victor W. Pickard, Transcending Net Neutrality: Ten Steps Toward an Open Internet, 12 J. INTERNET L., No. 6, 1 (2008).
175. Jennifer L. Newman, Keeping the Internet Neutral: Net Neutrality and Its Role in Protecting Political Expression on the Internet, 31 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 153 (Fall 2008).
176. Amit M. Schejter, "Justice, and Only Justice, You Shall Pursue": Network Neutrality, the First Amendment and John Rawls's Theory of Justice, 14 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. Rev. 137 (Fall 2007).
177. Howard A. Shelanski, Network Neutrality: Regulating with More Questions Than Answers, 6 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 23 (Fall 2007).
178. J. Gregory Sidak, A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Network Neutrality Regulation of the Internet, 2 J. COMP. L. & ECON., No. 3, 349 (2006).
179. Adam Thierer, Are "Dumb Pipe" Mandates Smart Public Policy? Vertical Integration, Net Neutrality, and the Network Layers Model, 3 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 275 (2005).
180. Barbara van Schewick, Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation, 5 J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 329 (2007).
181. Tim Wu, Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination, 2 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH L. 141 (2005), http://ssrn.com/abstract=388863
182. Tim Wu & Christopher S. Yoo, Keeping the Internet Neutral? Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate, 59 FED. COMM. L.J. 575 (2007).
183. Christopher S. Yoo, Beyond Network Neutrality, 19 HARV. J.L. & TECH. (Fall 2005).
184. Christopher S. Yoo, Network Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion, 94 GEO. L.J. 1847 (2006).
185. Christopher S. Yoo, Would Mandating Broadband Network Neutrality Help or Hurt Competition? A Comment on the End-to-End Debate, 3 J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 23 (2004).
186. Robert D. Atkinson, Framing a National Broadband Policy, 16 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 145 (2007).
187. Yochai Benkler, Freedom in the Commons: Towards a Political Economy of Information, 52 DUKE L.J. 1245 (2003).
188. Jim Chen, The Authority to Regulate Broadband Internet Access over Cable, 16 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 677 (Spring 2001).
189. Robert W. Crandall, The Empirical Case Against Asymmetric Regulation of Broadband Internet Access, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 953 (Summer 2002).
190. Robert W. Crandall & Leonard Waverman, The Failure of Competitive Entry into Fixed-Line Telecommunications: Who Is at Fault? 2 J. COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS 113 (2006).
191. Susan P. Crawford, The Internet and the Project of Communications Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (Dec. 2007).
192. Susan P. Crawford, Internet Think, 5 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 467 (Winter 2007).
193. James Crowe, The Digital Broadband Migration Regulation and Free Markets Redux: Additional Insights on Regulating the Telecommunications Industry in the New Economy, 5 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 487 (Winter 2007).
194. Rob Frieden, Adjusting the Horizontal and Vertical in Telecommunications Regulation: A Comparison of the Traditional and a New Layered Approach, 55 FED. COMM. L.J. 207 (2003).
195. Rob Frieden, Regulatory Arbitrage Strategies and Tactics in Telecommunications, 5 N.C. J. L. & TECH. 227 (Spring 2004).
196. Rob Frieden, What Do Pizza Delivery and Information Services Have in Common? Lessons from Recent Judicial and Regulatory Struggles with Convergence, 32 RUTGERS COMPUTER. & TECH. L.J., No. 2, 247 (2006).
197. Justin P. Hedge, The Decline of Title II Common-Carrier Regulations in the Wake of Brand X: Long-Run Success for Consumers, Competition, and the Broadband Internet Market, 14 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 427 (2006).
198. Reed E. Hundt, Communications Policy for 2006 and Beyond, 58 FED. COMM. L.J. 1 (2006).
199. International Telecommunication Union, ITU New Initiatives Programme: The Regulatory Environment for Future Mobile Multimedia Services, World Wide Web site, http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/multimobile/index.html.
200. Sascha D. Meinrath & K.C. Claffy, The Commons Initiative: Cooperative Measurement and Modeling 16 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 407 (2008).
201. Thomas B. Nachbar, The Public Network, 17 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 67 (2008).
202. Philip M. Napoli, Paradoxes of Media Policy Analysis: Implications for Public Interest Media Regulation, 60 ADMIN. L. Rev. 801 (Fall 2008).
203. Susan Ness, The Law of Unintended Consequences, 58 FED. COMM. L.J. 531 (2006).
204. Jonathan E. Nuechterlein & Philip J. Weiser, DIGITAL CROSSROADS-AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY IN THE INTERNET AGE (MIT Press, 2005).
205. William D. Rahm, Watching Over the Web: A Substantive Equality Regime for Broadband Applications, 24 YALE J. ON REG. 1 (Winter 2007).
206. Ed Rosenberg, The National Regulatory Research Institute, Assessing Wireless and Broadband Substitution in Local Telephone Markets, Publication No. 07-06 (June 2007), http://nrri.org/pubs/telecommunications/07-06.pdf.
207. Amit M. Schejter. AND COMMUNICATIONS FOR ALL-A POLICY AGENDA FOR A NEW ADMINISTRATION (Lexington Books, 2009).
208. Howard A. Shelanski, Adjusting Regulation to Competition: Toward a New Model for U.S. Telecommunications Policy, 24 YALE J. ON REG. 55 (Winter, 2007).
209. Philip J. Weiser, Law and Information Platforms, J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L., 1 (2002).
210. Philip J. Weiser, Toward a Next Generation Regulatory Strategy, 35 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 41 (2003).
211. Kevin Werbach, Breaking the Ice: Rethinking Telecommunications Law for the Digital Age, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 59 (Fall 2005).
212. Kevin Werbach, The Federal Computer Commission, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (2005).
213. Richard S. Whitt, Adaptive Policymaking: Evolving and Applying Emergent Solutions for U.S. Communications Policy, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 483 (2009).
214. Richard S. Whitt, A Horizontal Leap Forward: Formulating a New Communications Public Policy Framework Based on the Network Layers Model, 56 FED. COMM. L.J. 587 (2004).
215. Richard S. Whitt & Stephen J. Schultze, The New "Emergence Economics" of Innovation and Growth, and What It Means for Communications Policy, 7 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 217 (Spring 2009).
216. Tim Wu, Why Have a Telecommunications Law? Antidiscrimination Norms in Communications, 5 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 15 (2006).
217. Christopher S. Yoo, The Rise and Demise of the Technology-Specific Approach to the First Amendment, 91 GEO. L.J. 245 (2003).
218. Stuart Minor Benjamin, The Logic of Scarcity: Idle Spectrum as a First Amendment Violation, 52 DUKE L.J. 1 (2002).
219. Stuart Minor Benjamin, Spectrum Abundance and the Choice Between Private and Public Control, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 2007 (Dec. 2003).
220. Jerry Brito, The Spectrum Commons in Theory and Practice, 2007 STAN. TECH. L. Rev. 1 (2007).
221. Kenneth R. Carter, Policy Lessons from Personal Communications Services: Licensed vs. Unlicensed Spectrum Access, 15 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 93 (2006).
222. Susan P. Crawford, The Ambulance, the Squad Car, and the Internet, 21 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 873 (Spring 2006).
223. Gerald R. Faulhaber, The Question of Spectrum: Technology, Management, and Regime Change, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 123 (Fall 2005).
224. Gerald R. Faulhaber, Wireless Telecommunications: Spectrum as a Critical Resource, 79 S. CAL. L. Rev. 537 (2006).
225. Harold Feld, From Third Class Citizen to First Among Equals: Rethinking the Place of Unlicensed Spectrum in the FCC Hierarchy, 15 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 53 (2006).
226. Rob Frieden, Balancing Equity and Efficiency Issues in the Management of Shared Global Radiocommunication Resources, 24 U. PA. J. INT'L ECON. L. 289 (Summer 2003).
227. Ellen P. Goodman, Spectrum Auctions and the Public Interest, 7 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 343 (Spring 2009).
228. Ellen P. Goodman, Spectrum Equity, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 217 (Fall 2005).
229. Ellen P. Goodman, Spectrum Rights in the Telecosm to Come, 41 SAN DIEGO L. Rev. 269 (Feb. Mar. 2004).
230. Thomas W. Hazlett, A Law and Economics Approach to Spectrum Property Rights: A Response to Weiser and Hatfield, 15 GEO. MASON L. Rev. 975 (June 2008).
231. Thomas W. Hazlett, Property Rights and Wireless License Values, 51 J.L. & ECON. 563 (Aug. 2008).
232. Thomas W. Hazlett, Spectrum Tragedies, 22 YALE J. ON REG. 242 (Summer 2005).
233. Thomas W. Hazlett & Matthew L. Spitzer, Advanced Wireless Technologies and Public Policy, 79 S. CAL. L. Rev. 595 (Mar. 2006).
234. Jeremiah Johnston, The Paradise of the Commons or Privileged Private Property-What Direction Should the FCC Take on Spectrum Regulation? 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 173 (2004).
235. John S. Leibovitz, The Great Spectrum Debate: A Commentary on the FCC Spectrum Policy Task Force's Report on Spectrum Rights and Responsibilities, 6 YALE J. L. & TECH. 390 (2004).
236. Travis E. Litman, Cognitive Radio: Moving Toward a Workable Framework for Commercial Leasing of Public Safety Spectrum, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 249 (Fall 2005).
237. R. Paul Margie, Can You Hear Me Now? Getting Better Reception from the FCC's Spectrum Policy, 2004 STAN. TECH. L. Rev. 5 (2004).
238. New America Foundation, THE CARTOON GUIDE TO FEDERAL SPECTRUM POLICY (2006), http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/theecartooneguideetoefederalespectrumepolicy
239. Patrick S. Ryan, Application of the Public-Trust Doctrine and Principles of Natural Resource Management to Electromagnetic Spectrum, 10 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. Rev. 285 (2004).
240. Daniel Sineway, What's Wrong with Wireless? An Argument for a Liability Approach to Electromagnetic Spectrum Regulation, 41 GA. L. Rev. 671 (Winter 2007).
241. James B. Speta, Making Spectrum Reform "Thinkable," 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 183 (Fall 2005).
242. Pablo T. Spiller, Towards a Property Rights Approach to Communications Spectrum, 16 YALE J. ON REG. 53 (Winter 1999).
243. Lindsey L. Tonsager, Increasing E-Quality in Rural America: U.S. Spectrum Policy and Adverse Possession, 90 MINN. L. Rev. 1506 (2006).
244. Scott Wallsten, Reverse Auctions and Universal Telecommunications Service: Lessons from Global Experience, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 373 (Mar. 2009).
245. Joseph M. Ward, Secondary Markets in Spectrum: Making Spectrum Policy as Flexible as the Spectrum Market It Must Foster, 10 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 103 (2001).
246. Philip J. Weiser, Communicating During Emergencies: Toward Interoperability and Effective Information Management, 59 FED. COMM. L.J. 547 (June 2007).
247. Philip J. Weiser, Policing the Spectrum Commons, 74 FORDHAM L. Rev. 663 (Nov. 2005).
248. Philip J. Weiser & Dale Hatfield, Spectrum Policy Reform and the Next Frontier of Property Rights, 15 GEO. MASON L. Rev. 549 (Spring 2008).
249. Kevin Werbach, Supercommons: Toward a Unified Theory of Wireless Communication, 82 TEX. L. Rev. 863 (Mar. 2004).
250. Colin R. Blackman, Universal Service: Obligation or Opportunity? TELECOMM. POL'Y 19 (1995).
251. Jim Chen, Standing in the Shadows of Giants: The Role of Intergenerational Equity in Telecommunications Reform, 71 U. COLO. L. Rev. 921 (Fall 2000).
252. Jim Chen, Subsidized Rural Telephony and the Public Interest: A Case Study in Cooperative Federalism and Its Pitfalls, 2 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 307 (Fall 2003).
253. Rob Frieden, Killing with Kindness: Fatal Flaws in the $6.5 Billion Universal Service Funding Mission and What Should Be Done to Narrow the Digital Divide, 24 CAR-DOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 447 (2006).
254. Farid Gasmi, Jean-Jacques Laffont & William W. Sharkey, Competition, Universal Service and Telecommunications Policy in Developing Countries, 12 INFO. ECON. & POL'Y, No. 3, 221 (2000).
255. Allen S. Hammond, IV, Universal Service: Problems, Solutions, and Responsive Policies, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 187 (2005).
256. Krishna P. Jayakar & Harmeet Sawhney, Universal Service: Beyond Established Practice to Possibility Space, 28 TELECOMM. POL'Y., Nos. 3/4, 339 (2004).
257. Jonathan Meer, Highway Robbery Online: Is E-Rate Worth the Fraud? 2006 BYU EDUC. & L.J. 323 (2006).
258. Milton L. Mueller, UNIVERSAL SERVICE: COMPETITION, INTERCONNECTION, AND MONOPOLY IN THE MAKING OF THE AMERICAN TELEPHONE SYSTEM (MIT Press, 1997).
259. Milton L. Mueller, Universal Service in Telephone History: A Reconstruction, 17 TELE-COMM. POL'Y, 352 (1993).
260. Mira Burri Nenova, The New Concept Of Universal Service in a Digital Networked Communications Environment, 3 I/S: J. L. & POL'Y FOR INFO. SOC'Y 117 (Spring 2007).
261. Caio M. Silva, Pereira Neto, Development Theory and Foundations of Universal Access Policies, 2 I/S: J. L. & POL'Y FOR INFO. SOC'Y 365 (Spring-Summer 2006).
262. Kevin Werbach, Connections: Beyond Universal Service in the Digital Age, 7 J. TELE-COMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 67 (Winter 2009).
263. Ramsey L. Woodworth, Camp Runamuck: The FCC's Troubled E-Rate Program, 14 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 335 (2006).
264. Xinzhu Zhang, Jean-Jacques Laffont & Antonio Estache, UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBLIGATIONS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 3421 (2004).
265. Stephen E. Blythe, The Regulation of Voice-over-Internet-Protocol in the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, 5 J. HIGH TECH. L. 161 (2005).
266. Robert Cannon, State Regulatory Approaches to VoIP: Policy, Implementation, and Outcome, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 479 (May 2005).
267. Mark C. Del Bianco, Voices Past: The Present and Future of VoIP Regulation, 14 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 365 (2006).
268. Jared S. Dinkes, Rethinking the Revolution: Competitive Telephony in a Voice over Internet Protocol Era, 66 OHIO ST. L.J. 833 (2005).
269. R. Alex DuFour, Voice over Internet Protocol: Ending Uncertainty and Promoting Innovation Through a Regulatory Framework, 13 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 471 (2005).
270. Jerry Ellig & Alastair Walling, Regulatory Status of VoIP in the Post-Brand X World, 23 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 89 (2006)
271. Daniel B. Garrie & Rebecca Wong, Regulating Voice over Internet Protocol: An E.U./U.S. Comparative Approach, 22 AM. U. IN'TL L. Rev. 549 (2007).
272. Chérie R. Kiser & Angela F. Collins, Regulation on the Horizon: Are Regulators Poised to Address the Status of IP Telephony? 11 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 19 (2003).
273. Sunny Lu, Note, Cellco Partnership v. FCC & Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission: VoIP's Shifting Legal and Political Landscape, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 859 (2005).
274. Linda A. Rushnak, Is Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Subject to Regulation Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996? 17 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 213 (2007).
275. Jimar Sanders, Voice over Internet Protocol: An International Approach to Regulation, 35 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 575 (Spring 2007).
276. Mark L. Silverstein, VoIP and Pay-To-Play: Broadband's Attempt to Push Away Direct Competition, 155 U. PA. L. Rev. 1305 (2007).
277. Konrad L. Trope, Voice over Internet Protocol: The Revolution in America's Telecommunications Infrastructure, 22 COMPUTER & INTERNET LAW, 12, 1 (2005).
278. Melissa Winberg, Calling All Angles: Perspectives on Regulating Internet Telephony, 10 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 241 (Fall 2007).
279. Randolph Beard, Developing a National Wireless Regulatory Framework: A Law and Economics Approach, 16 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 391 (2008).
280. Yochai Benkler, Some Economics of Wireless Communications, 16 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 25 (Fall 2002).
281. Adam Clay, Unlocking the Wireless Safe: Opening Up the Wireless World for Consumers, 61 FED. COMM. L.J. 715 (2009).
282. Rob Frieden, Hold the Phone: Assessing the Rights of Wireless Handset Owners and Carriers, 69 U. PITT. L. Rev. No. 4, 675 (2008).
283. Robert W. Hahn, The Economics of "Wireless Net Neutrality," 3 J. COMPETITION L. & ECON. 399 (2007).
284. Thomas Hazlett, The Wireless Craze, the Unlimited Bandwidth Myth, the Spectrum Auction Faux Pas, and the Punchline to Ronald Coase's "Big Joke": An Essay on Airwave Allocation Policy, 14 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 335 (Spring 2001).
285. Thomas W. Hazlett & Matthew L. Spitzer, Advanced Wireless Technologies and Public Policy, 79 S. CAL. L. Rev. 595 (2006).
286. Patrick S. Ryan, Wireless Communications and Computing at a Crossroads: New Paradigms and Their Impact on Theories Governing the Public's Right to Spectrum Access, 3 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 239 (Spring 2005).
287. Kevin Werbach, Super commons: Toward a Unified Theory of Wireless Communication, 82 TEX. L. Rev. 863 (2004).