Biologically inspired mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructures

Annual Review of Materials Research

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 173-203

  Heepe, Lars ^a   Gorb, Stanislav N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Bio inspired surfaces; Contact mechanics; Friction; Gecko

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; AIR; DEFORMATION; FRICTION; MICROSTRUCTURE; VACUUM APPLICATIONS;

BIOLOGICAL ADHESIVES; BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED; CONTACT GEOMETRY; CONTACT MECHANICS; GECKO; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; SURFACE MICROSTRUCTURES; TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 84903179896     PISSN: 15317331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100458     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. 1997. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1-8
2. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W. 2000. Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealizedmodel of shark skin. Exp. Fluids 28:403-12
3. Yu KL, Fan TX, Lou S, Zhang D. 2013. Biomimetic optical materials: integration of natures design for manipulation of light. Prog. Mater. Sci. 58:825-73
4. Gorb SN. 2006. Functional surfaces in biology: mechanisms and applications. In Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies, ed. Y Bar-Cohen, pp. 381-97. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
5. Creton C, Gorb S. 2007. Sticky feet: from animals to materials. MRS Bull. 32:466-72
6. Waite JH, Andersen NH, Jewhurst S, Sun CJ. 2005. Mussel adhesion: finding the tricksworth mimicking. J. Adhes. 81:297-317
7. Santos R, Gorb S, Jamar V, Flammang P. 2005. Adhesion of echinoderm tube feet to rough surfaces. J. Exp. Biol. 208:2555-678
8. Israelachvili JN. 1992. Intermolecular and Surface Forces:With Applications to Colloidal and Biological Systems. London/Orlando, FL: Academic
9. Popov VL. 2010. Contact Mechanics and Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Berlin/Heidelberg, Ger.: Springer
10. Kendall K. 2001. Molecular Adhesion and Its Applications. New York: Kluwer Acad.
11. Gumbiner BM. 1996. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84:345-57
12. Tsang PH, Li GL, Brun YV, Ben Freund L, Tang JX. 2006. Adhesion of single bacterial cells in the micronewton range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:5764-68
13. Gorb SN. 2001. Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Acad.
14. Persson BNJ. 2000. Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Berlin: Springer
15. Maboudian R, Howe RT. 1997. Critical review: adhesion in surface micromechanical structures. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15:1-20
16. Kendall K. 1971. Adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids. J. Phys. D 4:1186
17. Brockmann W, Geiß PL, Klingen J, Schröder B. 2009. Adhesive Bonding: Adhesives, Applications and Processes. Weinheim, Ger.: Wiley
18. Autumn K. 2007. Gecko adhesion: structure, function, and applications. MRS Bull. 32:473-78
19. Gorb SN. 2011. Biological fibrillar adhesives: functional principles and biomimetic applications. In Handbook of Adhesion Technology, Vol. 2, ed. LFM da Silva, A Öchsner, RD Adams, pp. 1409-36. Heidelberg, Ger.: Springer
20. Huber G, Gorb SN, Spolenak R, Arzt E. 2005. Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy. Biol. Lett. 1:2-4
21. Vogel MJ, Steen PH. 2010. Capillarity-based switchable adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107:3377-81
22. Steudle E. 2001. The cohesion-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:847-75
23. Gorb SN, Popov VL. 2002. Probabilistic fasteners with parabolic elements: biological system, artificial model and theoretical considerations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 360:211-25
24. Jin X, Strueben J, Heepe L, Kovalev A, Mishra YK, et al. 2012. Joining the un-joinable: adhesion between low surface energy polymers using tetrapodal ZnO linkers. Adv. Mater. 24:5676-80
25. Wright DR, Chen L, Federlin P, Forbes K. 1995. Manufacturing issues of electrostatic chucks. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13:1910-16
26. Fremerey M, Gorb S, Heepe L, Kasper D, Maempel J, Witte H. 2012. Shifting allometry: combination of macroscopic engineering with microscopic biomimetics allows realization of new robot functions in meso dimension. Proc. ROBOTIK 2012, 7th, Munich, Ger., May 21-22, pp. 1-6
27. Federle W. 2006. Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol. 209:2611-21
28. Kamperman M, Kroner E, del Campo A, McMeeking RM, Arzt E. 2010. Functional adhesive surfaces with "gecko" effect: the concept of contact splitting. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12:335-48
29. Jagota A, Hui CY. 2011. Adhesion, friction, and compliance of bio-mimetic and bio-inspired structured interfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 72:253-92
30. Gorb SN, Beutel RG. 2001. Evolution of locomotory attachment pads of hexapods. Naturwissenschaften 88:530-34
31. Beutel RG, Gorb SN. 2001. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 39:177-207
32. Varenberg M, Pugno NM, Gorb SN. 2010. Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion. Soft Matter 6:3269-72
33. Jagota A, Bennison SJ. 2002. Mechanics of adhesion through a fibrillar microstructure. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42:1140-45
34. Arzt E, Gorb SN, Spolenak R. 2003. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:10603-6
35. Peressadko A, Gorb SN. 2004. When less is more: experimental evidence for tenacity enhancement by division of contact area. J. Adhes. 80:247-61
36. Crosby AJ, Hageman M, Duncan A. 2005. Controlling polymer adhesion with "pancakes." Langmuir 21:11738-43
37. Varenberg M, Murarash B, Kligerman Y, Gorb SN. 2011. Geometry-controlled adhesion: revisiting the contact splitting hypothesis. Appl. Phys. A 103:933-38
38. Hui CY, GlassmakerNJ, Tang T, Jagota A. 2004. Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces. 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion. J. R. Soc. Interface 1:35-48
39. Chung JY, Chaudhury MK. 2005. Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads. J. R. Soc. Interface 2:55-61
40. Tang T, Hui CY. 2005. Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one? J. R. Soc. Interface 2:505-16
41. Persson BNJ. 2003. On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems. J. Chem. Phys. 118:7614-21
42. Persson BNJ, Gorb S. 2003. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J. Chem. Phys. 119:11437-44
43. Kim TW, Bhushan B. 2007. Adhesion analysis of multi-level hierarchical attachment system contacting with a rough surface. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 21:1-20
44. Filippov A, Popov VL, Gorb SN. 2011. Shear induced adhesion: contact mechanics of biological spatulalike attachment devices. J. Theor. Biol. 276:126-31
45. Spolenak R, Gorb S, Arzt E. 2005. Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. Acta Biomater. 1:5-13
46. Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao HJ, Arzt E. 2005. Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc. R. Soc. A 461:305-19
47. del Campo A, Greiner C, Arzt E. 2007. Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir 23:10235-43
48. Greiner C, Spolenak R, Arzt E. 2009. Adhesion design maps for fibrillar adhesives: the effect of shape. Acta Biomater. 5:597-606
49. Peisker H, Michels J, Gorb SN. 2013. Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata. Nat. Commun. 4:1661
50. Vincent JFV. 2002. Arthropod cuticle: a natural composite shell system. Composites A 33:1311-15
51. Vincent JFV, Wegst UGK. 2004. Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 33:187-99
52. Barbakadze N, Enders S, Gorb S, Arzt E. 2006. Local mechanical properties of the head articulation cuticle in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J. Exp. Biol. 209:722-30
53. Puthoff JB, Prowse MS, Wilkinson M, Autumn K. 2010. Changes in materials properties explain the effects of humidity on gecko adhesion. J. Exp. Biol. 213:3699-704
54. Prowse MS, WilkinsonM, Puthoff JB, Mayer G, Autumn K. 2011. Effects of humidity on the mechanical properties of gecko setae. Acta Biomater. 7:733-38
55. Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST, Zesch W, Chan WP, et al. 2000. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405:681-85
56. Russell AP. 1975. A contribution to functional-analysis of foot of Tokay, Gekko gecko (reptilia: Gekkonidae). J. Zool. 176:437-76
57. Gao HJ, Wang X, Yao HM, Gorb S, Arzt E. 2005. Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech. Mater. 37:275-85
58. Niederegger S, Gorb S. 2003. Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. J. Insect Physiol. 49:611-20
59. Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Holldobler B. 2001. Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6215-20
60. Hosoda N, Gorb SN. 2011. Friction force reduction triggers feet grooming behaviour in beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B 278:1748-52
61. Fuller KNG, Tabor D. 1975. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. A 345:327-42
62. Persson BNJ, Tosatti E. 2001. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. J. Chem. Phys. 115:5597-610
63. Persson BNJ. 2002. Adhesion between an elastic body and a randomly rough hard surface. Eur. Phys. J. E 8:385-401
64. Purtov J, Gorb EV, Steinhardt M, Gorb SN. 2013. Measuring of the hardly measurable: adhesion properties of anti-adhesive surfaces. Appl. Phys. A 111:183-89
65. Lorenz B, Krick BA, Mulakaluri N, Smolyakova M, Dieluweit S, et al. 2013. Adhesion: role of bulk viscoelasticity and surface roughness. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25:225004
66. Varenberg M, Gorb SN. 2009. Hexagonal surface micropattern for dry and wet friction. Adv. Mater. 21:483-86
67. Kovalev AE, Varenberg M, Gorb SN. 2012. Wet versus dry adhesion of biomimetic mushroom-shaped microstructures. Soft Matter 8:7560-66
68. Stark AY, Badge I, Wucinich NA, Sullivan TW, Niewiarowski PH, Dhinojwala A. 2013. Surface wettability plays a significant role in gecko adhesion underwater. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:6340-45
69. Borodich FM, Gorb EV, Gorb SN. 2010. Fracture behaviour of plant epicuticular wax crystals and its role in preventing insect attachment: a theoretical approach. Appl. Phys. A 100:63-71
70. Gorb SN, Varenberg M. 2007. Mushroom-shaped geometry of contact elements in biological adhesive systems. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 21:1175-83
71. Gorb SN. 1998. The design of the fly adhesive pad: Distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proc. R. Soc. B 265:747-52
72. Hiller U. 1968. Untersuchungen zum Feinbau und zur Funktion der Haftborsten von Reptilien. Z. Morphol. Tiere 62:307-62
73. Tian Y, Pesika N, Zeng HB, Rosenberg K, Zhao BX, et al. 2006. Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:19320-25
74. Niederegger S, Gorb SN. 2006. Friction and adhesion in the tarsal and metatarsal scopulae of spiders. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192:1223-32
75. Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, Cutkosky M. 2006. Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J. Exp. Biol. 209:3569-79
76. Pesika NS, Tian Y, Zhao BX, Rosenberg K, Zeng H, et al. 2007. Peel-zone model of tape peeling based on the gecko adhesive system. J. Adhes. 83:383-401
77. Pugno N, Gorb S. 2009. Functional mechanism of biological adhesive systems described by multiple peeling approach. Proc. Int. Conf. Fract., 12th, Ottawa, July 12-17
78. Pugno NM. 2011. The theory of multiple peeling. Int. J. Fract. 171:185-93
79. Lin Q, Gourdon D, Sun CJ, Holten-Andersen N, Anderson TH, et al. 2007. Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3782-86
80. Pelletier Y, Smilowitz Z. 1987. Specialized tarsal hairs on adultmale Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), hamper its locomotion on smooth surfaces. Can. Entomol. 119:1139-42
81. Stork NE. 1983. A comparison of the adhesive setae on the feet of lizards and arthropods. J. Nat. Hist. 17:829-35
82. Daltorio KA, Horchler AD, Gorb SN, Ritzmann RE, Quinn RD. 2005. A small wall-walking robot with compliant, adhesive feet. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Can., pp. 4018-23. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
83. Kim S, Sitti M. 2006. Biologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89:261911
84. Gorb S, Varenberg M, Peressadko A, Tuma J. 2007. Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure. J. R. Soc. Interface 4:271-75
85. Varenberg M, Gorb S. 2007. Shearing of fibrillar adhesive microstructure: friction and shear-related changes in pull-off force. J. R. Soc. Interface 4:721-25
86. Kim S, Aksak B, Sitti M. 2007. Enhanced friction of elastomer microfiber adhesives with spatulate tips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91:221913
87. Varenberg M, Gorb S. 2008. A beetle-inspired solution for underwater adhesion. J. R. Soc. Interface 5:383-85
88. Varenberg M, Gorb S. 2008. Close-up of mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure: contact element behaviour. J. R. Soc. Interface 5:785-89
89. Spuskanyuk AV, McMeeking RM, Deshpande VS, Arzt E. 2008. The effect of shape on the adhesion of fibrillar surfaces. Acta Biomater. 4:1669-76
90. Murphy MP, Aksak B, Sitti M. 2009. Gecko-inspired directional and controllable adhesion. Small 5:170-75
91. Murphy MP, Kim S, Sitti M. 2009. Enhanced adhesion by gecko-inspired hierarchical fibrillar adhesives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1:849-55
92. Davies J, Haq S, Hawke T, Sargent JP. 2009. A practical approach to the development of a synthetic Gecko tape. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29:380-90
93. Cheung E, Sitti M. 2009. Adhesion of biologically inspired polymer microfibers on soft substrates. Langmuir 25:6613-16
94. Glass P, Chung HY, Washburn NR, Sitti M. 2009. Enhanced reversible adhesion of dopamine methacrylamide-coated elastomer microfibrillar structures under wet conditions. Langmuir 25:6607-12
95. Kim S, Cheung E, Sitti M. 2009. Wet self-cleaning of biologically inspired elastomer mushroom shaped microfibrillar adhesives. Langmuir 25:7196-99
96. Sitti M, Cusick B, Aksak B, Nese A, Lee HI, et al. 2009. Dangling chain elastomers as repeatable fibrillar adhesives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1:2277-87
97. Sameoto D, Menon C. 2009. A low-cost, high-yield fabrication method for producing optimized biomimetic dry adhesives. J. Micromech. Microeng. 19:115002
98. Li YS, Sameoto D, Menon C. 2010. Enhanced compliant adhesive design and fabrication with dual-level hierarchical structure. J. Bionic Eng. 7:228-34
99. Sameoto D, Menon C. 2010. Deep UV patterning of acrylic masters for molding biomimetic dry adhesives. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20:115037
100. Glass P, Chung HY, Washburn NR, Sitti M. 2010. Enhanced wet adhesion and shear of elastomeric micro-fiber arrays with mushroom tip geometry and a photopolymerized p (DMA-coMEA) tip coating. Langmuir 26:17357-62
101. Carbone G, Pierro E, Gorb SN. 2011. Origin of the superior adhesive performance ofmushroom-shaped microstructured surfaces. Soft Matter 7:5545-52
102. Cheung E, Sitti M. 2011. Enhancing adhesion of biologically inspired polymer microfibers with a viscous oil coating. J. Adhes. 87:547-57
103. Kwak MK, Jeong HE, Suh KY. 2011. Rational design and enhanced biocompatibility of a dry adhesive medical skin patch. Adv. Mater. 23:3949-53
104. Heepe L, Varenberg M, Itovich Y, Gorb SN. 2011. Suction component in adhesion ofmushroom-shaped microstructure. J. R. Soc. Interface 8:585-89
105. Xue LJ, Kovalev A, Thole F, Rengarajan GT, Steinhart M, Gorb SN. 2012. Tailoring normal adhesion of arrays of thermoplastic, spring-like polymer nanorods by shaping nanorod tips. Langmuir 28:10781-88
106. Carbone G, Pierro E. 2012. Effect of interfacial air entrapment on the adhesion of bio-inspired mushroom-shaped micro-pillars. Soft Matter 8:7904-8
107. Kroner E, Arzt E. 2012. Single macropillars as model systems for tilt angle dependent adhesion measurements. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 36:32-38
108. Peng ZL, Chen S.H. 2012. The effect of geometry on the adhesive behavior of bio-inspired fibrils. Soft Matter 8:9864-69
109. Sameoto D, Sharif H, Menon C. 2012. Investigation of low-pressure adhesion performance of mushroom-shaped biomimetic dry adhesive. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 26:2641-52
110. Carbone G, Pierro E. 2012. Sticky bio-inspired micropillars: finding the best shape. Small 8:1449-54
111. Kovalev AE, Gorb SN. 2012. Charge contribution to the adhesion performance of polymeric microstructures. Tribol. Lett. 48:103-9
112. Heepe L, Kovalev AE, Varenberg M, Tuma J, Gorb SN. 2012. First mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructure: a review. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 2:014008
113. Röhrig M, Thiel M, Worgull M, Hölscher H. 2012. 3D direct laser writing of nano- and microstructured hierarchical gecko-mimicking surfaces. Small 8:3009-15
114. Jeong HE, Suh KY. 2012. Precise tip shape transformation of nanopillars for enhanced dry adhesion strength. Soft Matter 8:5375-80
115. Drotlef DM, Stepien L, Kappl M, Barnes WJP, Butt HJ, del Campo A. 2013. Insights into the adhesive mechanisms of tree frogs using artificial mimics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23:1137-46
116. Kizilkan E, Heepe L, Gorb SN. 2013. Underwater adhesion of mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructure: an air-entrapment effect. In Biological and Biomimetic Adhesives: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. P Flammang, pp. 65-71. London: R. Soc. Chem.
117. Kroner E, Arzt E. 2013. Mechanistic analysis of force-displacement measurements on macroscopic single adhesive pillars. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61:1295-1304
118. Piccardo M, Chateauminios A, Fretigny C, Pugno N, Sitti M. 2013. Contact compliance effects in the frictional response of bioinspired fibrillar adhesives. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20130182
119. Henrey M, DíazTéllez JP, WormnesK, Pambaguian L, Menon C. 2013. Towards the use ofmushroomcapped dry adhesives in outer space: effects of low pressure and temperature on adhesion strength. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 29:185-90
120. Heepe L, Kovalev AE, Filippov AE, Gorb SN. 2013. Adhesion failure at 180, 000 frames per second: direct observation of the detachment process of a mushroom-shaped adhesive. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:104301
121. Zhou M, Tian Y, Sameoto D, Zhang XJ, Meng YG, Wen SZ. 2013. Controllable interfacial adhesion applied to transfer light and fragile objects by using gecko inspired mushroom-shaped pillar surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5:10137-44
122. Kasem H, Varenberg M. 2013. Effect of counterface roughness on adhesion of mushroom-shaped microstructure. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20130620
123. Afferante L, Carbone G. 2013. Themechanisms of detachment of mushroom-shapedmicro-pillars: from defect propagation to membrane peeling. Macromol. React. Eng. 7:609-15
124. Bin Khaled W, Sameoto D. 2013. Anisotropic dry adhesive via cap defects. Bioinspir. Biomim. 8:044002
125. Hossfeld CK, Schneider AS, Arzt E, Frick CP. 2013. Detachment behavior of mushroo-shaped fibrillar adhesive surfaces in peel testing. Langmuir 29:15394-404
126. Carbone G, Pierro E. 2013. A review of adhesion mechanisms of mushroom-shaped microstructured adhesives. Meccanica 48:1819-33
127. Sameoto D, Ferguson B. 2014. Robust large-area synthetic dry adhesive. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28:337-53
128. Heepe L, Carbone G, Pierro E, Kovalev AE, Gorb SN. 2014. Adhesion tilt-tolerance in bio-inspired mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104:011906
129. Drotlef DM, Blümler P, del Campo A. 2014. Magnetically actuated patterns for bioinspired reversible adhesion (dry and wet). Adv. Mater. 26:775-79
130. Varenberg M, Peressadko A, Gorb S, Arzt E, Mrotzek S. 2006. Advanced testing of adhesion and friction with a microtribometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77:066105
131. Hosoda N, Gorb SN. 2012. Underwater locomotion in a terrestrial beetle: combination of surface dewetting and capillary forces. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:4236-42
132. Maderson PFA. 1964. Keratinized epidermal derivatives as an aid to climbing in gekkonid lizards. Nature 203:780-81
133. Stork NE. 1980. Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J. Exp. Biol. 88:91-107
134. Brörmann K, Burger K, Jagota A, Bennewitz R. 2012. Discharge during detachment of micro-structured PDMS sheds light on the role of electrostatics in adhesion. J. Adhes. 88:589-607
135. Izadi H, Penlidis A. 2013. Polymeric bio-inspired dry adhesives: van derWaals or electrostatic interactions? Macromol. React. Eng. 7:588-608
136. Persson BNJ, Scaraggi M, Volokitin AI, Chaudhury MK. 2013. Contact electrification and the work of adhesion. Europhys. Lett. 103:36003
137. Horn RG, Smith DT. 1992. Contact electrification and adhesion between dissimilar materials. Science 256:362-64
138. Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD. 1971. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. A 324:301-13
139. Kendall K. 1975. Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J. Phys. D 8:1449-52
140. Murphy MP, Sitti M. 2007. Waalbot: an agile small-scale wall-climbing robot utilizing dry elastomer adhesives. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 12:330-38