Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1421-1426

  Fong, Ted C T ^a   Ho, Rainbow T H ^b  

^a Pauline Chan Building   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Confirmatory factor analysis; Gender; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Maximum likelihood; Measurement invariance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; BAYES THEOREM; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX RATIO; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ANXIETY; BAYES THEOREM; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DEPRESSION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84903158809     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0594-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361-370. (Pubitemid 13098606)
2. Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3. (Pubitemid 34192886)
3. Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression scale - A review of validation data and clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42(1), 17-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4. (Pubitemid 27095712)
4. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002.
5. Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210-222. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003.
6. Hunt-Shanks, T., Blanchard, C., Reid, R., Fortier, M., & Cappelli, M. (2010). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cardiac patients: Addressing factor structure and gender invariance. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 97-114. doi: 10.1348/135910709x432745.
7. Gale, C. R., Allerhand, M., Sayer, A. A., Cooper, C., Dennison, E. M., Starr, J. M., et al. (2010). The structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: The HALCyon program. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(4), 559-571. doi: 10.1017/s1041610210000256.
8. Annunziata, M. A., Muzzatti, B., & Altoe, G. (2011). Defining Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: A contribution to validation for oncological settings. Annals of Oncology, 22(10), 2330-2333. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq750.
9. Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett's recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851-858. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023.
10. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737-757. doi: 10.1177/0013164404264853. (Pubitemid 39392566)
11. Millsap, R. E. (2007). Structural equation modeling made difficult. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 875-881. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.021.
12. Kolenikov, S. (2011). Biases of parameter estimates in misspecified structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 41, 119-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01236.x.
13. Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381-398. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.12.4.381.
14. Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313-335. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.
15. Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. Fong, T. C. T., & Ho, R. T. H. (2013). Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0429-2.
17. Leung, C. M., Wing, Y. K., Kwong, P. K., Lo, A., & Shum, K. (1999). Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100(6), 456-461.
18. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
19. Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304-321. doi: 10.1177/0734282911406653.
20. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
21. Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
22. Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
24. Verhagen, A. J., & Fox, J. P. (2012). Bayesian tests of measurement invariance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02059.x.
25. Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes, 17, 1-48.
26. MacCallum, R. C., Edwards, M. C., & Cai, L. (2012). Hopes and cautions in implementing Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 340-345. doi: 10.1037/a0027131.
27. Rindskopf, D. (2012). Next steps in Bayesian structural equation models: Comments on, variations of, and extensions to Muthen and Asparouhov (2012). Psychological Methods, 17(3), 336-339. doi: 10.1037/a0027130.
28. Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a new method. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 346-353. doi: 10.1037/a0029214.