Accounting education research: Ranking institutions and individual scholars

Issues in Accounting Education

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 87-115

  Kip Holderness Jr , D ^a   Myers, Noah M ^b   Summers, Scott L ^b   Wood, David A ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting education; Accounting research rankings; Accounting research topical areas

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903127636     PISSN: 07393172     EISSN: 15587983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/iace-50600     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, W. T., and P. B. McKenzie. 1978. Leading accounting departments revisited. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 135-138.
2. Ballas, A., and V. Theoharakis. 2003. Exploring diversity in accounting through faculty journal perceptions. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (4): 619-644.
3. Bazley, J. D., and L. A. Nikolai. 1975. A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review 50 (3): 605-610.
4. Bonner, S. E., J. W. Hesford, W. A. Van der Stede, and S. M. Young. 2006. The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31: 663-685.
5. Borde, S. F., J. M. Cheney, and J. Madura. 1999. A note on perceptions of finance journal quality. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 12 (1): 89-97.
6. Brown, L. D., and R. J. Huefner. 1994. The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. M.B.A. programs. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (1): 223-250.
7. Bublitz, B., and R. Kee. 1984. Measures of research productivity. Issues in Accounting Education 2 (1): 39-60.
8. Chan, K. C., K. C. Chan, G. S. Seow, and K. Tam. 2009. Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6-7): 875-885.
9. Coyne, J. G., S. L. Summers, B. Williams, and D. A. Wood. 2010. Accounting program research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education 25 (4): 631-654.
10. Glover, S. M., D. R. Prawitt, S. L. Summers, and D. A. Wood. 2012. Publication benchmarking data based on faculty promoted at the top-75 U.S. accounting research institutions. Issues in Accounting Education 27 (3): 647-670.
11. Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, and D. A. Wood. 2006. Publication records of faculty promoted at the top-75 accounting research programs. Issues in Accounting Education 21 (3): 195-218.
12. Hasselback, J. R., A. Reinstein, and M. Abdolmohammadi. 2012. Benchmarking the Research Productivity of Accounting Doctorates. Working paper, The Florida State University, Wayne State University, and Bentley University.
13. Hasselback, J. R., A. Reinstein, and E. S. Schwann. 2000. Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty. Journal of Accounting Education 18 (2): 79-97.
14. Herron, T. L., and T. W. Hall. 2004. Faculty perceptions of journals: Quality and publishing feasibility. Journal of Accounting Education 22 (3): 175-210.
15. Hult, G. T. M., M. Reimann, and O. Schilke. 2009. Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: Rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations. Global Edge Business Review 3 (3): 1-23.
16. Jacobs, F. A., A. L. Hartgraves, and L. H. Beard. 1986. Publication productivity of doctoral alumni: A timeadjusted model. The Accounting Review 61 (1): 179-187.
17. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2009. Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review 84 (6): 2047-2075.
18. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2010. Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review 85 (6): 2173-2203.
19. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2011. Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review 86 (6): 2197-2233.
20. Lee, T. A. 1995. Shaping the U.S. academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of an elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 241-261.
21. Lee, T. A., and P. F. Williams. 1999. Accounting from the inside: Legitimizing the accounting academic elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (6): 867-895.
22. Locke J., and A. Lowe. 2008. Evidence and implications of multiple paradigms in accounting knowledge production. European Accounting Review 17 (1): 161-191.
23. Lowensohn, S., and D. P. Samelson. 2006. An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research. Issues in Accounting Education 21 (3): 219-239.
24. Pathways Commission. 2012. The Pathways Commission: Charting a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants. Available at: http://commons.aaahq.org/files/0b14318188/Pathways_ Commission_Final_Report_Complete.pdf
25. Pickerd, J., N. M. Stephens, S. L. Summers, and D. A. Wood. 2011. Individual accounting faculty research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education 26 (3): 471-505.
26. Reinstein, A., and J. R. Hasselback. 1997. A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty. Journal of Accounting Education 15 (3): 425-455.
27. Stephens, N. M., S. L. Summers, B. Williams, and D. A. Wood. 2010. Accounting doctoral program rankings based on research productivity of program graduates. Accounting Horizons 25 (1): 149-182.
28. Windal, F. W. 1981. Publishing for a varied public: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 56 (3): 653-658.
29. Zivney, T. L., W. J. Bertin, and T. A. Gavin. 1995. A comprehensive examination of accounting faculty publishing. Issues in Accounting Education 10 (1): 1-25.