Individual accounting faculty research rankings by topical area and methodology

Issues in Accounting Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 471-505

  Pickerd, Jeffrey ^a   Stephens, Nathaniel M ^a   Summers, Scott L ^a   Wood, David A ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting research methodology; Accounting research rankings; Accounting research topical areas

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052374453     PISSN: 07393172     EISSN: 15587983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/iace-50002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrews, W. T., and P. B. McKenzie. 1978. Leading accounting departments revisited. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 135-138.
2. Bazley, J. D., and L. A. Nikolai. 1975. A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review 50 (3): 605-610.
3. Bonner, S. E., J. W. Hesford, W. A. Vander Stede, and S. M. Young. 2006. The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (7): 663-685.
4. Brown, L. D., and J. C. Gardner. 1985. Applying citation analysis to evaluate the research contributions of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review 60 (2): 262-277.
5. Brown, L. D., and I. Laksmana. 2004. Ranking accounting Ph.D. programs and faculties using social science research network downloads. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 22 (3): 249-266.
6. Brown, L. D., and I. Laksmana. 2007. Accounting Ph.D. program graduates: Affiliation performance and publication performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 29 (3): 285-313.
7. Bublitz, B., and R. Kee. 1984. Measures of research productivity. Issues in Accounting Education 2 (1): 39- 60.
8. Cargile, R. C., and B. Bublitz. 1986. Factors contributing to published research by accounting faculties. The Accounting Review 61 (1): 158-178.
9. Chan, K. C., K. C. Chan, G. S. Seow, and K. Tam. 2009. Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 34 (6-7): 875-885.
10. Chan, K. C., and K. Liano. 2009. Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions and researchers in accounting. Accounting and Finance 49 (1): 59-74.
11. Chen, Y., A. Gupta, and L. Hoshower. 2006. Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business 81 (4): 179-189.
12. Coyne, J. G., S. L. Summers, B. Williams, and D. A. Wood. 2010. Accounting program research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education 25 (4): 631-654.
13. Deloitte Foundation. 2007. Accounting doctoral student survey. Available at: http://aaahq.org/temp/phd/Deloitte_PhD_Survey2007summer.pdf
14. Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, S. L. Summers, and D. A. Wood. 2010. Promotion Benchmarking Statistics for Faculty at the Top 75 U.S. Accounting Research Institutions. Working paper, Brigham Young University.
15. Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, and D. A. Wood. 2006. Publication records of faculty promoted at the top 75 accounting research programs. Issues in Accounting Education 21 (3): 195-218.
16. Hasselback, J. R., A. Reinstein, and E. S. Schwann. 2000. Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty. Journal of Accounting Education 18 (2): 79-97.
17. Heck, J. L. 2009. Most Prolific Authors in the Accounting Literature over the past Half-Century: 1959-2009. Working paper, St Joseph's University.
18. Herron, T. L., and T. W. Hall. 2004. Faculty perceptions of journals: Quality and publishing feasibility. Journal of Accounting Education 22 (3): 175-210.
19. Hodder, L., P. E. Hopkins, and D. A. Wood. 2008. The effects of financial statement and informational complexity on analysts' cash flow forecasts. The Accounting Review 83 (4): 915-956.
20. Holley, J. W. 1977. Tenure and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 6 (2): 181-192.
21. Jacobs, F. A., A. L. Hartgraves, and L. H. Beard. 1986. Publication productivity of doctoral alumni: A time-adjusted model. The Accounting Review 61 (1): 179-187.
22. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2009. Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review 84 (6): 2047-2075.
23. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2010. Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review 85 (6): 2173-2203.
24. Lee, T. 1995. Shaping the U.S. academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the construction of a social e ́lite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 241-61.
25. Lowensohn, S., and D. P. Samelson. 2006. An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research. Issues in Accounting Education 21 (3): 219-239.
26. Oler, D., M. Oler, and C. J. Skousen. 2010. Characterizing accounting research. Accounting Horizons 24 (4): 635-370.
27. Panozzo, F. 1997. The making of the good academic accountant. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (5): 447-480.
28. Prawitt, D. F., J. L. Smith, and D. A. Wood. 2009. Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review 84 (4): 1255-1280.
29. Reinstein, A., and J. R. Hasselback. 1997. A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty. Journal of Accounting Education 15 (3): 425-455.
30. Reiter, S. A., and P. F. Williams. 2002. The structure and progressivity of accounting research: The crisis in the academy revisited. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27: 575-607.
31. Stephens, N. M., S. L. Summers, B. Williams, and D. A. Wood. 2010. Accounting doctoral program rankings based on research productivity of program graduates. Accounting Horizons 25 (1): 149-182.
32. Swanson, E. P. 2004. Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (1): 223-255.
33. Williams, P. F., J. G. Jenkins, and L. Ingraham. 2006. The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the U.S.: The process for anointing academic elites. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (8): 783-818.
34. Windal, F. W. 1981. Publishing for a varied public: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 56 (3):653-658.
35. Zivney, T. L., and W. J. Bertin. 1992. Publish or perish: What the competition is really doing. The Journal of Finance 47 (1): 295-329.
36. Zivney, T. L., W. J. Bertin, and T. A. Gavin. 1995. A comprehensive examination of accounting faculty publishing. Issues in Accounting Education 10 (1): 1-25.