Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 619-644

  Ballas, Apostolos ^a   Theoharakis, Vasilis ^b  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b Athens Laboratory of Business Administration   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accounting; Diversity; Journal rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542399555     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/MLWH-KBTM-ET47-LYKH     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arrow, K. 1951. Social choice and individual values. Cowles Commission monograph no. 12. New York: Wiley.
2. Benjamin, J. J., and V. C. Brenner. 1974. Perceptions of journal quality. The Accounting Review 49 (2): 360-2.
3. Bradshaw, D. 2000. FT MBA 2000. Financial Times, January 24.
4. Brin, T., M. J. Jones, and M. Pendlebury. 1996. UK accountants' perceptions of research journal quality. Accounting and Business Research 26 (3): 265-78.
5. Brown, L. D., and J. C. Gardner. 1985. Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1): 84-109.
6. Brown, L. D., and R. J. Huefner. 1994. The familiarity with the perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. MBA programs. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (1): 223-50.
7. Business Week. 1998. The best business schools. Business Week, October 19.
8. Campbell, D. K., J. Gaertner, and R. P. Vecchio. 1983. Perceptions of promotion and tenure criteria: A survey of accounting educators. Journal of Accounting Education 1 (1): 83-92.
9. Carmona, S., I. Gutiérrez, and M. Cámara. 1999. A profile of European accounting research: Evidence from leading accounting journals. European Accounting Review 8 (3): 463-80.
10. Cole, S. 1983. The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology 89 (1): 111-39.
11. Collin, S., U. Johansson, K. Svensson, and P. Ulvenblad. 1996. Market segmentation in scientific publications: Research patterns in American vs. European management journals. British Journal of Management 7 (2): 141-54.
12. Dyckman, T. R., and S. A. Zeff. 1984. Two decades of the Journal of Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Spring): 225-97.
13. Garfield, E. 1979. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
14. Gray, R. H., J. Guthrie, and L. D. Parker. 2001. Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: An essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship. Working paper, Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney.
15. Greene, W. H. 2000. Econometric analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hasselback, J. R., and A. Reinstein. 1995. A proposal for measuring scholarly productivity of accounting faculty. Issues in Accounting Education 10 (2): 269-306.
17. Howard, P., and L. A. Nikolai. 1983. Attitude measurement and perceptions of accounting faculty publication outlets. The Accounting Review 58 (4): 765-76.
18. Hull, R. P., and G. B. Wright. 1990. Faculty perceptions of research journal quality: An update. Accounting Horizons 4 (1): 77-98.
19. Huit, T. M., W. T. Neese, and R. E. Bashaw. 1997. Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education 19 (1): 37-52.
20. Humphrey, C. 2001. Paper prophets and the continuing case for thinking differently about accounting research. British Accounting Review 33(1):91-103.
21. Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Lee, T. 1995. Shaping the US academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of a professional elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 241-61.
23. Loft, A., A. Jorissen, and P. Walton. 2002. From newsletter to academic journal: Creating the European Accounting Review. European Accounting Review 11 (1): 43-75.
24. Luke, R. H., and E. R. Doke. 1987. Marketing journal hierarchies: Faculty perceptions, 1986-87. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 15 (1): 74-7.
25. Lukka, K., and E. Kasanen. 1996. Is accounting a global or a local discipline? Evidence from major research journals. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (7/8): 755-73.
26. Luukhonen, T. 1992. Is scientists' behaviour reward-seeking? Scientometrics 24 (2): 297-319.
27. McRae, T. W. 1974. A citation analysis of the accounting information network. Journal of Accounting Research 12 (1): 80-92.
28. Milne, M. 2000. Towards the end of academic freedom, diversity, judgement and accountability: A critique of Casser and Holmes' (1999) journal yardsticks. Accounting, Accountability and Performance 6 (1): 99-116.
29. Milne, M. 2001. Debating accounting research journal rankings: Empirical issues from a citation-based analysis and theoretical dilemmas from economics. Working paper, Department of Accountancy & Business Law, University of Otago.
30. Newman, J. M., and E. Cooper. 1993. Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (3): 518-26.
31. Nobes, C. W. 1985. International variations in perceptions of accounting journals. The Accounting Review 60 (4): 702-5.
32. Nobes, C. W. 1986. Academic perceptions of accounting journals in the English speaking world. British Accounting Review 18 (1): 7-16.
33. Oppenheim, C. 1996. Do citations count? Citation indexing and the research assessment exercise. Serials 9 (2): 155-61.
34. Panozzo, F. 1997. The making of the good academic accountant. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (5): 447-80.
35. Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review 18 (4): 599-620.
36. Smith, G., and J. L. Krogstad. 1988. A taxonomy of content and citations in Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 8 (1): 108-17.
37. Theoharakis, V., and A. Hirst. 2002. Perceptions of marketing journals: A worldwide view. Marketing Letters 13 (4): 389-402.
38. Theoharakis, V., and M. Skordia. 2003. How do statisticians perceive statistics journals? American Statistician 57 (2): 115-24.
39. Todorov, R., and W. Glanzel. 1988. Journal citation measures: A concise review. Journal of Information Science 14 (1): 47-56.
40. Van Fleet, D. D., A. McWilliams, and D. S. Siegel. 2000. A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management 26 (5): 839-61.
41. Van Maanen, J. 1995. Fear and loathing in organizational studies. Organizational Science 6 (6): 687-92.