A catalyst toward sustainability? Exploring social learning and social differentiation approaches with the agricultural poor

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 2685-2717

  Shaw, Alison ^a   Kristjanson, Patti ^b  

^a FlipSide Sustainability   (Canada)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Adaptive capacity; Agricultural livelihoods; Climate change; Gender; Social differentiation; Social learning; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; FARMERS KNOWLEDGE; FOOD SECURITY; GENDER ROLE; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; LEARNING; SMALLHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84902987006     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6052685     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Vogel, C.; Moser, S.C.; Kasperson, R.E.; Dabelko, G.D. Linking vulnerability, adaptation and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players and partnerships. Glob. Environ. Change 2007, 17, 349-364.
2. Thornton, P.K.; Jones, P.G.; Owiyo, T.; Kruska, R.L.; Herrero, M.; Orindi, V.; Bhadwal, S.; Kristjanson, P.; Notenbaert, A.; Bekele, N.; et al. Climate change and poverty in Africa: Mapping hotspots of vulnerability. Afr. J. Agric. Resour. Econom. 2008, 2, 24-44.
3. Kristjanson, P.; Reid, R.; Dickson, N.; Clark, W.C.; Romney, D.; Puskur, R.; MacMillan, S.; Grace, D. Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 9, 5047-5052.
4. Kristjanson, P.; Harvey, B.; van Epp, M.; Thornton, P.K. Social learning and sustainable development. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4, 5-7.
5. Clark, W.C.; Tomich, T.P.; van Noordwijk, M.; Guston, D.; Catacutan, D.; Dickson, N.M.; McNie, E. Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
6. Vermeulen, S.; Challinor, A.J.; Thornton, P.K.; Campbell, B.M.; Eriyagama, N.; Vervoort, J.M.; Kingyangi, J.; Jarvis, A.; Laderach, P.; Ramirez-Villegas, J.; et al. Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8357-8362.
7. Berkes, F.; Folke, C.; Colding, J. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998.
8. Fazey, I.; Fazey, J.A.; Fischer, J.; Sherren, K.; Warren, J.; Noss, R.F.; Dovers, S.F. Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social-ecological resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5, 375-380.
9. Armitage, D.R.; Plummer, R.; Berkes, F.; Arthus, A.I.; Charles, A.T.; Davidson-Hunt, I.J.; Diduck, A.P.; Doubleday, N.C.; Johnson, D.S.; Marschke, M.; et al. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 95-102.
10. Armitage, D.R.; Berkes, F.; Dale, A.; Kocho-Schellenberg, E.; Patton, E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 995-1004.
11. Reed, M.S.; Evely, A.C.; Cundill, G.; Fazey, I.; Glass, J.; Laing, A.; Newig, J.; Parrish, B.; Prell, C.; Raymond, C.; et al. What is social learning? Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, r1. Available online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/(accessed on 18 February 2014).
12. Rodela, R. Social learning and natural resource management: The emergence of three research perspectives. Ecol. Soc. 2011, doi:10.5751/es-04554-160430.
13. Yuen, E.; Jovicich, S.S.; Preston, B.L. Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: Four case studies in south-eastern Australia. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2013, 18, 567-590.
14. Bos, J.J.; Brown, R.R.; Farrelly, M.A. A design framework for creating social learning situations. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23, 398-412. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha (accessed on 3 December 2012).
15. Harvey, B.; Ensor, J.; Carlile, L.; Garside, B.; Patterson, Z.; Naess, L.O. Climate Change Communication and Social Learning-Review and Strategy Development for CCAFS; CCAFS Working Paper No. 22; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012. Available online: http://www.ccafs.cgiar.org (accessed on 18 February 2014).
16. Harvey, B.; Carlile, L.; Ensor, J.; Garside, B.; Patterson, Z. Understanding context in learning-centred approaches to climate change communication. IDS Bull. 2012, 43, 31-37. Available online: http://www.academia.edu/1929874/Understanding_Context_in_Learning-centred_ Approaches_to_Climate_Change_Communication (accessed on 8 April 2014).
17. Nilsson, A.E.; Swartling, A.G. Social Learning about Climate Adaptation: Global and Local Perspectives; Working Paper; Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2009.
18. Ferris, S.; Best, R.; Lundy, M.; Ostertage, C.; Gottret, M.; Wandschneider, T. Strategy Paper: A participatory and area-based approach to rural agroenterprise development. In CIAT Rural Agroenterprise Development Good Practice Guide 1; Publication No. 349; International Center for Tropical Agriculture: Cali, Colombia, 2006.
19. Kristjanson, P.; Neufeldt, H.; Gassner, A.; Mango, J.; Kyazze, F.; Desta, S.; Sayula, G.; Thiede, B.; Förch, W.; Thornton, P.K.; et al. Are food insecure smallholder households making changes in their farming practices? Evidence from East Africa. Food Secur. 2012, 4, 381-397. Available online: http://www.springerlink.com/content/1876-4517/(accessed on 25 May 2012).
20. Gonsalves, J. Promising Approaches for CCAFS Theme 4 to Consider in its Social Learning Efforts; CCAFS Climate Change and Social Learning Document; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013.
21. Douthwaite, B.; Alvarez, S.; Thiele, G.; Mackay, R. Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis: A practical method for project planning and evaluation. In Briefing Paper 17. The European-Latin American Project on Co-Innovation in Agricultural Ecosystems; 2008. Available online: http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/publications/briefs/ILAC_Brief17_PIPA.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2013).
22. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation; A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Dokken, D.J., Ebi, K.L., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S.K., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1-19.
23. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 7-22.
24. O'Brien, K.; Leichenko, R.M. Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob. Environ. Change 2000, 10, 221-232.
25. UNDP. Gender, Climate Change and Community-Based Adaptation; A Guidebook for Designing and Implementing Gender-Sensitive Community-Based Adaptation Programmes and Projects; United Nations Development Program: New York, NY, USA, 2010. Available online: http://www.content.undp.org/go/cms-service/download/publication/?version (accessed on 7 October 2012).
26. Smith, G. Why markets need to be part of a climate-smart solution. In CIAT News: Eco-efficiency in Action; International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) in the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research; CIAT: Cali, Colombia, 2013. Available online: http://www.ciatnews.cgiar.org/2013/12/14/why-markets-need-to-be-part-of-a-climate-smart-solution/(accessed on 16 December 2013).
27. Abraham, M.; Purkayastha, B. Making a difference: Linking research and action in practice, pedagogy and policy for social justice: Introduction. Curr. Sociol. 2012, 60, 123-141.
28. Chikwendu, D.O.; Arokoyo, J.O. Women and sustainable agricultural development in Nigeria. J. Sustain. Agric. 1997, 11, 53-69.
29. Paris, T.; Singh, A.B.; Singh, V.N. Assessing the impact of participatory research in rice breeding on women farmers: A case study in eastern Uttar Pradesh India. In New Avenues in Impact Assessment of Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, Proceedings of the Impact Assessment Workshop, CIMMYT, Headquarters, Texcoco, Mexico, 19-21 October 2005;
30. Lilja, N., Dixon, J., La, R.R., Hellin, J., Feldstein, H.S., Eds.; CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation (PRGA) Program: Cali, Columbia; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT): Texcoco, Mexico, 2006; p. 37.
31. Karami, E.; Mansoorabadi, A. Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviours: A gender analysis of Iranian farmers. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008, 10, 883-898.
32. Kakota, T.; Nyariki, D.; Mkwambisi, D.; Kogi-Makau, W. Gender vulnerability to climate variability and household food insecurity. Clim. Dev. 2011, 3, 298-309.
33. Doss, C.; Grown, C.; Deere, C.D. Gender and Asset Ownership: A Guide to Collecting Individual-Level Data; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. Available online: http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&theSitePK=469372&menuPK=64216926&entityID=000158349_20080902085153 (accessed on 18 February 2014).
34. Meinzen-Dick, R.; Quisumbing, A.; Behrman, J.; Biermayr-Jenzano, P.; Wilde, V.; Noordeloos, M.; Ragasa, C.; Beintema, N. Engendering Agricultural Research, Development and Extension; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
35. Lundy, M.; Gottret, M.V. Learning Alliances: An Approach for Building Multi-Stakeholder Innovation Systems, Working Paper. 2006. Available online: http://reseau.crdi.ca/es/ev-104473-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html (accessed on 23 July 2012).
36. Food and Agricultural Organisations (FAO). Module 1: Livelihoods, Poverty and Institutions. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0273e/a0273e04.htm (accessed on 18 February 2014).
37. Deverill, P.; Bibby, S.; Wedgwood, A.; Smout, I. Designing Water and Sanitation Projects to Meet Demand in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas-The Engineer's Rone; Interim Report; Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University of Technology, WEDC: Loughborough, UK, 2001.
38. Espinosa, C. Unveiling Differences, Finding a Balance: Social Gender Analysis for Designing Projects on Community-Based Management of Natural Resource. Available online: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/sp_unveiling_differences.pdf (accessed on 18 February 2014).
39. Okali, C. Achieving transformative change for rural women's empowerment. In Enabling Rural Women's Economic Empowerment: Institutions, Opportunities and Participation; University of Sussex: Brighton, UK, 2011. Available online: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw56/egm/Okali-EP-8-EGM-RW-Sep-2011.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2012).
40. Collins, K.; Ison, R. Living with environmental change: Adaptation as social learning. Environ. Policy Learn. 2009, 19, 351-357.
41. Defoer, T.; Wopereis, M.C.S.; Idinoba, P.; Kadisha, K.L.; Diack, S.; Gaye, M. Curriculum for Participatory Learning and Action Research (PLAR) for Integrated Rice Management (IRM) in Inland Valleys of Sub-Saharan Africa: Facilitator's Manual; Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP), International Rice Research Institute partnership with AfricaRice: Cotonou, Benin, 2009. Available online: http://www.africarice.org/warda/guide-plar.asp (accessed on 18 February 2014).
42. Rist, S.M.C.; Escobar, C.; Wiesmann, U. "It was hard to come to mutual understanding.."-The multidimensionality of social learning processes concerned with sustainable natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 2006, 19, 219-237.
43. Kelly, M.; Adger, N. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim. Change 2000, 47, 325-352.
44. Wiek, A.; Talwar, S.; O'Shea, M.; Robinson, J. Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. Res. Eval. 2014, 23, 117-132.
45. Pelling, M.; Chris, H.; Dearing, J.; Smith, D. Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ. Plan. A 2008, 40, 867-884.
46. Brydon-Miller, M.; Greenwood, D.; Maguire, P. Why action research? Action Res. 2003, 1, 9-28.
47. Jasanoff, S.; Wynne, B. Science and decision making. In Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal Framework; Rayner, S., Malone, E., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, USA, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 1-87.
48. Gieryn, T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 781-795.
49. Gieryn, T.F. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line; Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1999.
50. Guston, D.H. Boundary organisations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2001, 26, 399-408.
51. Shaw, A. Imbued Meaning: Science-policy interactions in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ph. D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 2005.
52. Pringle, P.; Conway, D. Voices from the frontline: The role of community-generated information in delivering climate adaptation and development objectives at project level. Clim. Dev. 2012, 1, 1-10.
53. Agrawal, A.; Perrin, N. Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods. In Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance; Adger, W.N., Lorenzoni, I., O'Brien, K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009.
54. Wang, J.; Brown, D.G.; Riolo, R.L.; Page, S.E.; Agrawal, A. Exploratory analyses of local institutions for climate change adaptation in the Mongolian grasslands: An agent-based modeling approach. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23, 1266-1276.
55. Pahl-Wostl, C.; Craps, M.; Dewulf, A.; Mostert, E.; Tabara, D.; Taillieu, T. Social learning and water resources management. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, Article 5.
56. Pahl-Wostl, C.; Tabara, D.; Bouwen, R.; Craps, M.; Dewulf, A.; Mostert, E.; Ridder, D.; Taillieu, T. The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecol. Econom. 2008, 64, 484-495.
57. Swaans, K.; Cullen, B.; van Rooyen, A.; Adekunle, A.; Ngwenya, H.; Lemma, Z.; Nederlof, S. Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: Lessons for facilitation. Knowl. Manag. Dev. J. 2013, 9, 116-135.
58. Star, S.L.; Griesemer, J.R. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1989, 19, 387-420.
59. Dale, A.; Newman, L. E-dialogues: A role in interactive sustainable development? Integr. Assess. J. Bridg. Sci. Policy 2006, 4, 31-141.
60. Jones, L.; Ludi, E.; Levine, S. Towards a Characterization of Adaptive Capacity: A Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity at the Local Level; Background Note; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 2010. Available online: http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/5177-adaptive-capacity-framework-local-level-climate (accessed on 6 September 2012).
61. AfricaRice. Rice Rural Learning Initiative; Africa Rice Center: Rice Science at the service of Africa: Contonou, Benin. Available online: http://www.africarice.org/warda/p3-rurallearning.asp (accessed on 4 June 2012).
62. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Drought tolerant maize for Africa initiative (2006-2012). Available online: http://dtma.cimmyt.org/(accessed on 15 June 2012).
63. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Stress tolerant varieties for Africa and South Asia (STRASA). Available online: http://strasa.irri.org/about (accessed on 4 June 2012).
64. WorldFish. Gender strategy brief: a gender transformative approach to research in development in Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Available online: http://www.worldfishcenter.org/resource_centre/WF_3048.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2012).
65. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and CARE International. Payment for Ecosystem Services Pilot Project in Navaisha, Kenya. 2011. Available online: http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/green_ economy_2011/pdf/session_4_biodiversity_protection_cases_kenya.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2012).
66. International Potato Center (CIP). Impacts of climate change take a toll on Andean potato farmers. Available online: http://cipotato.org/press-room/press-releases/climate-change-takes-a- toll-on-andean-potato-farming (accessed on 30 May 2012).
67. Lundy, M. Creating Business Models for Smallholder Inclusion in the Food Industry: CIAT's Linking Farmers-to-Markets Research Area; CIAT Linking Farmers to Markets (LFM) Strategy Overview; International Centre for Tropical Agriculture: Cali, Colombia, 2010.
68. Lundy, M.; Gottret, M.V.; Ashby, J. Learning Alliances: An approach for building multi-stakeholder innovation systems. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), 2005. Available online: http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/ILAC_Brief08_alliances_0.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2012) or http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/content/chapter-14-learning-alliances (accessed on 6 June 2012).
69. Laderach, P. Adaptation by agricultural communities to climate change through participatory and supply chain inclusive management (2010-2011). International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Available online: http://ongoing-research.cgiar.org/factsheets/adaptation-by-agricultural- communities-to-climate-change-through-participatory-and-supply-chain-inclusive-management/(accessed on 30 May 2012).
70. Laderach, P.; Lundy, M.; Jarvis, A.; Ramirez, J.; Portilla, E.P.; Schepp, K.; Eitzinger, A. Predicted Impact of Climate Change on Coffee Supply Chains. In The Economic, Social and Political Elements of Climate Change, Climate Change Management; Filho, W.L., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 703-723.
71. SFL. Under what conditions are value chains effective tools for pro-poor development? Agriculture and Development Project. Sustainable Food Laboratory, 2011. Available online: http://sustainablefood.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=183:aadlibrary&catid=24 (accessed on 12 June 2012).
72. Paris, T.; Cueno, A.; Manzanilla, D.; Tatlonghari, G.; Villanueva, D.; Singh, H.N. Ensuring that Men and Women Farmers' Opinions Matter in Rice Varietal Improvement through PVS in Stress-Prone Environments; International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Philippines, 2012. Available online: http://www.scribd.com/doc/94741370/Ensuring-that-men-and-women- farmers'-opinions-matter-in-rice-varietal-improvement-through-PVS-in-stress-prone-environment (accessed on 21 November 2012).