"It was hard to come to mutual understanding..."-The multidimensionality of social learning processes concerned with sustainable natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 219-237

  Rist, Stephan ^a   Chiddambaranathan, Mani ^b   Escobar, Cesar ^c   Wiesmann, Urs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b SAMPARK ^*  (India)

^c Agroecología Universidad Cochabamba   (Bolivia)

Author keywords

Communicative action; Expert knowledge; Local knowledge; Power; Social learning processes; Sustainable use of natural resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747721451     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-006-9014-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahearn DO (2000) Urban empowerment as public participation: The Atlanta-Project and Jurgen Habermas's theory of communicative action. Annu Soc Christ Ethics 20:349-368
2. Ballard D (2005) Using learning processes to promote change for sustainable development. Act Res 3(2): 135-156
3. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) (1998) Autodidactic learning for sustainability - approach and concept. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
4. Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: Its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9-21
5. Cissé A, Kamissoko S, Konaté F (2004) Evaluation des potentiels et des limites des processus d'apprentissage social et de négociation pour la gestion durable des ressources naturelles, et de relations avec des modules de formation autodidacte. Réseau des modérateurs de la formation autodidacte en Mali, Bamako
6. Dewulf A, Craps M, Bouwen R, Abril F, Zhingri M (2005) How indigenous farmers and university engineers create actionable knowledge for sustainable irrigation. Act Res 3(2): 175-192
7. Escobar C (2004) Aprendizaje autodidacta para la sostenibilidad y percepciones campesinas sobre la organización del territorio. Caso de la comunidad qullpapata en la microcuenca sisaqeña del municipio de tacopaya. Agroecología Universidad de Cochabamaba. Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamaba
8. Flood RL, Romm NR (1996) Diversity management: triple loop learning. John Wiley, New York
9. Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action - volume 1 (Translated by T. McCarthy). Beacon Press, Boston
10. Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16385-16389
12. Hwang A (2000) Toward fostering systems learning in organizational contexts. Syst Pract Act Res 13(3):329-343
13. Jacobson TL, Storey JD (2004) Development communication and participation: Applying Habermas to a case study of population programs in Nepal. Commun Theor 14(2):99-121
14. Kemmis S (2001) Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage Publications, London, pp 91-102
15. Leeuwis C (2000) Reconceptualising participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Dev Change 31:931-959
16. Lutz C (1983) Parental goals, ethnopsychology, and the development of emotional meaning. Ethos 11(4):246-262
17. Maarleveld M, Dangb'egnon C (1999) Managing natural resources: A social learning perspective. Agr Human Values 16(3):267-280
18. McIntyre J (2003) Yeperenye dreaming in conceptual, geographical, and Cyberspace: A participatory action research approach to address local governance within an australian indigenous housing association. Syst Pract Act Res 16(5):309-338
19. Millar J, Curtis A (1999) Challenging the boundaries of local and scientific knowledge in Australia: Opportunities for social learning in managing temperate upland pastures. Agr Hum Values 16:389-399
20. Morrow RA, Torres CA (2002) Reading freire and habermas: critical pedagogy and transformative social change. Teachers College Press, New York
21. Oppenheimer L (1989) The nature of social action: social competence versus social conformism. In: Schneider B, Attili G, Nadel J, Weissberg R (eds) Social competence in development perspective. Kluwer Academic Press, pp 41-69
22. Parson E, Clark W (1995) Sustainable development as social learning: Theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research programme. In: Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 428-460
23. Phelps NA, Tewdwr-Jones M (2000) Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building. Environ Plann A 32(1):111-130
24. Premchander S, Jeyaseelan L, Chidambranathan M (2003) In search of water in Karnataka, India - degradation of natural resources and the livelihood crisis in Koppal District. Mt Res Dev 23(1): 19-23
25. Purdon M (2003) The nature of ecosystem management: postmodernism and plurality in the sustainable management of the boreal forest. Environ Sei Policy 6(4):377-388
26. Ramírez R, Fernández M (2005) Facilitation of collaborative management: Reflections from practice. Syst Pract Act Res 18(1):5-20
27. Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2006) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies (in press)
28. Rist S, Delgado F, Wiesmann U (2003) The role of social learning processes in the emergence and development of aymara land use systems. Mt Res Dev 23(3):263-270
29. Röling N (2002) Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences. Moving from multiple to distributed cognition in resource dilemmas. In: Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheelbarrows full of frogs - Social learning in rural resource management. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 25-47
30. Röling N, Maarleveld M (1999) Facing strategic narratives: In which we argue interactive effectiveness. Agr Hum Values 16:295-308
31. Schulser T, Decker D, Pfeffer M (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Natl Resour 15:309-326
32. Somers M (1994) The Narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theor Soc 23(5):605-649
33. Steins N, Edwards V (1999) Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agr Hum Values 16(3):241-255
34. United Nations (1992) Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. Rio Declaration on Environment and and Development. Final text of Agreements negotiated by Governments at the United Nations Conference of Environment and Development (UNCED), 2-14- June 1992, Brazil, Rio de Janeiro. United Nations, Washington
35. Wakeford T, Pimbert M (2004) Prajateerpu, power and knowledge : The politics of participatory action research in development Part 2. Analysis, reflections and implications. Act Res 2(1):25-46
36. Wiesmann U (1998) Sustainable regional development in rural Africa: Conceptual framework and case studies from Kenya. Geographica Bernensia African Studies - A14. Bern
37. Wiesmann U, Liechti K, Rist S (2005) Between conservation and development: Pathways to management of the first World Natural Heritage Site in the Alps by means of participatory processes. Mt Res Dev 25(2): 128-138
38. Wollenberg E, Edmunds D, Buck L, Fox J, Brodt S (2001) Social learning in community forests. CIFOR and East-West Centre, Indonesia
39. Woodhill J, Röling N (2000) The second wing of the eagle: The human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In: Röling N, Wagemakers A (eds) Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 46-71
40. Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theor Soc 27:151-208
41. Wu B, Pretty J (2004) Social connectedness in marginal rural China: The case of farmer innovation circles in Zhidan, North Shaanxi. Agr Hum Values 21:81-102