Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective

Planning Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 46-63

  Albrechts, Louis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Coproduction; equity; power balance; strategic planning

Indexed keywords

EQUITY; PERCEPTION; PLANNING THEORY; PUBLIC SERVICE; RECONSTRUCTION; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84872745395     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095212452722     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Albrechts L.Towards public involvement profiles. ACSP Congress; 2001Cleveland; 2001.
2. Albrechts L.Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2004;31:743-758.
3. Albrechts L.Spatial planning as transformative practice?.Ruimte en Planning. 2008;28 (3): 10-18.
4. Albrechts L.More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2010;37 (6): 1115-1127.
5. Appadurai A.Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics.Environment and Urbanization. 2001;13 (2): 23-44.
6. Balducci AEmpowering the Planning Fields: Ethics, Creativity and Action. Van den Broeck JMoulaert FOosterlynck S, ed. Acco: Leuven; 2008:79-99.
7. Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions. Balducci AFedeli VPasqui G, ed. Ashgate: Farnham; 2011:.
8. Bauman T,Bolnick J,Mitlin DThe age of cities and organizations of the urban poor: The world of the South African homeless people's federation and the people's dialogue on land and shelter. London:; 2002:.
9. Bergson HThe Creative Mind: An introduction to Metaphysics. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing Group; 1992:.
10. Boyle D,Harris MThe challenge of coproduction. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. London: Nesta; 2009:.
11. Bovaird T.Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services.Public Administration Review. 2007;:846-860.
12. BuhanginJ (2012) Towards a framework for planning indigenous regions in the Philippines: The relational approach. PhD thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium.
13. Cahn ENo More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative. Washington: Essential Books; 2000:.
14. Campbell H.Thinking about discourses: Theory is practical?.Planning Theory and Practice. 2002;3 (3): 351-352.
15. Chia R.From modern to postmodern organizational analysis.Organization Studies. 1995;16 (4): 579-604.
16. Chia R.A 'rhizomic' model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change.British Journal of Management. 1999;10:209-227.
17. Corburn J.Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: Improving urban planning for communities at risk.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;22:420-433.
18. Crone R,Graf Schaesberg PLouise Bourgeois: The Secret of Cells. Munich: Prestel Verlag; 2008:.
19. Fainstein SThe Just City. Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press; 2010:.
20. Forester JPlanning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
21. Forester JMaking Strategies in Spatial Planning. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010a:v-vii.
22. Forester JStrong Stories: How the Dutch are Reinventing Spatial Planning. Hajer MGrijzen Jvan't Klooster S, ed. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers; 2010b:170-185.
23. Friedmann JInsurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. London: Routledge; 2011:.
24. Godet MCreating Futures. London: Economica; 2001:.
25. Goodstein L,Nolan T,Pfeiffer JApplied Strategic Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993:.
26. Grosz EBecomings: Explorations in Time, Memory, and Futures. Grosz E, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1999:15-28.
27. Harvey DSpaces of Hope. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2000:.
28. Healey PMaking Strategic Spatial Plans. Healey PKhakee AMotte ANeedham B, ed. London: UCL Press; 1997:3-19.
29. Healey P.Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning.European Planning Studies. 2006;14 (4): 525-546.
30. Healey PUrban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. London: Routledge; 2007:.
31. Healey PEmpowering the Planning Fields, Ethics, Creativity and Action. Van den Broeck JMoulaert FOosterlynck S, ed. Leuven: Acco; 2008:.
32. Holston J.Spaces of insurgent citizenship.Planning Theory. 1995;13:35-51.
33. Holston J,Appadurai A.Cities and Citizenship.Public Culture. 1996;8:187-204.
34. Huxley M,Yftachel O.New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;19:331-342.
35. Joshi A,Moore M.Institutionalized coproduction: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments.The Journal of Development Studies. 2004;40 (4): 31-49.
36. Krumholz N,Forester JMaking Equity Planning Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1990:.
37. Lambert-Pennington K,Westendorff D,Reardon KACSP Congress. Salt Lake City:; 2011:.
38. Lauria M,Wagner J.Empirical studies of planning theory? A comparative case analysis of extant literature.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2006;25:346-381.
39. Urban Trialogues: Visions, Projects, Coproductions. Loeckx AShannon KTuts RVerschure H, ed. Nairobi: UN Habitat; 2004:.
40. Latour BLaboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1979:.
41. Mazza L.Strategic planning and republicanism. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS) Conference; 2009Belgrade; 2009.
42. Mazza LMaking Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010:79-85.
43. Milroy BM.Some thoughts about difference and pluralism.Planning Theory. 1992;7/8:33-38.
44. Mitlin D.With and beyond the state: Coproduction as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations.Environment and Urbanization. 2008;20 (2): 339-360.
45. Monno VMaking Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Cerreta MConcilio GMonno V, ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010:161-183.
46. Moulaert FGlobalization and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
47. Moulaert FStrategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change. Oosterlynck SVan den Broeck JAlbrechts LMoulaert FVerhetsel A, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011:79-84.
48. Motte ALa notion de planification stratégique spatialisée en Europe (1995-2005). Lyon: Puca; 2006:.
49. Needham BRevival of Strategic Planning. Salet WFaludi A, ed. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2000:79-90.
50. Ogilvy JCreating Better Futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:.
51. Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change. Oosterlynck SVan den Broeck JAlbrechts LMoulaert FVerhetsel A, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011:.
52. Ostrom EGoverning the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
53. Ostrom E.Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development.World Development. 1996;24 (6): 1073-1087.
54. Parks R,Baker P,Kiser L, et al.Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations.Policy Studies. 1981;9 (7): 1001-1011.
55. Roy ACity Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2003:.
56. Roy A.Civic governmentality: The politics of inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai.Antipode. 2009;41 (1): 159-179.
57. Roy APoverty Capital. New York: Routledge; 2010:.
58. Saija LACSP Congress. Salt Lake City:; 2011:.
59. Sandercock LTowards Cosmopolis. Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1998:.
60. Sager T.Activist modes of planning: A systematic overview. World Planning Schools Congress; 2011Perth; 2011.
61. Senge PThe Fifth Dimension. New York: Century/Doubleday; 1990:.
62. Time Banks (2011) History of coproduction: coproduction the emerging imperative. Available at: http://sbtimebank.org/pages/./historyOfCoProduction (accessed 8 August 2011).
63. Van den Broeck J,Verschure H,Esho LUrban Trialogues: Visions, Projects, Coproductions. Loeckx AShannon KTuts RVerschure H, ed. Nairobi: UN Habitat; 2004:198-212.
64. Van den Broeck J,Albrechts L,Segers RStrategische Ruimtelijke Projecten: Maatschappelijk en ruimtelijk vernieuwend. Brussels: Politeia; 2010:.
65. Watson V.Planning and conflict - moving on. World Planning Schools Congress; 2011Perth; 2011.
66. Whitaker G.Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery.Public Administration Review. 1980;40 (3): 240-246.
67. Winch G.Dynamic visioning for dynamic environments.The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1998;50 (4): 354-361.
68. Yiftachel O.Re-engaging planning theory? Towards 'south-eastern' perspectives.Planning Theory. 2006;5 (3): 211-222.
69. Zizek SLooking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992:.
70. Zizek SThe Ticklish Subject. London: Verso; 1999:.
71. Zizek SInterrogating the Real. London: Continuum; 2005:.