Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 141-159

  Waterhout, Bas ^a   Othengrafen, Frank ^a   Sykes, Olivier ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GLOBALIZATION; NEOLIBERALISM; PLANNING PRACTICE; REGIONALIZATION; SPATIAL PLANNING;

ENGLAND; FRANCE; GERMANY; NETHERLANDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84874765843     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699261     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aiginger, K. and Guger, A. 2006. The ability to adapt: Why it differs between the Scandinavian and Continental European models. Intereconomics, 14: 14-23.
2. Alber, J. 2006. The European social model and the United States. European Union Politics, 7: 393-419.
3. Alexander, E. R. 1998. Planning and implementation: Coordinative planning in practice. International Planning Studies, 3: 303-320.
4. Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G. 2012. The evolution and trajectories of English neo-liberal spatial governance: 'Neo-liberal' episodes in planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27
5. Balchin, P. N. and Sykora, L. 1999. Regional Policy and Planning in Europe, London: Routledge.
6. BMVBS-Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung. 2006. Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien für die Raumentwicklung in Deutschland, Berlin: BMVBS.
7. Booth, P. 2003. Promoting radical change: The Loi Relative à la Solidarité et au Renouvellement Urbains in France. European Planning Studies, 11: 949-963.
8. Brenner, J. 2010. Private initiatives in German urban development policy. Urban Research and Practice, 3: 219-228.
9. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Luxembourg: Regional Development Studies, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
10. Comité Stratégique de la DATAR. 2003. Une Nouvelle Politique de Développement des Territoires Pour la France, Paris: La Documentation Française.
11. Cowell, R. 2012. Planning and sustainability after the May 2010 Coalition government-Delivery, deliberation and divergence. Planning Practice and Research, 27
12. Délégation interministérielle à l'Aménagement du Territoire et à l'Attractivité Régionale (DATAR). 2011. Available at http://territoires.gouv.fr/la-datar (accessed 12 April 2011)
13. Department for Communities and Local Government. 2011a. National Planning Policy Framework: Myth-Buster, London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1984490.pdf (accessed 23 December 2011)
14. Department for Communities and Local Government. 2011b. Draft National Planning Policy Framework, London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1951811.pdf (accessed 23 December 2011)
15. Dikeç, M. 2006. Two decades of French urban policy: From social development of neighbourhoods to the republican penal state. Antipode, 38: 59-81.
16. Direction Générale de la Coopération Internationale et du Développement (DgCID). 2006. Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Policy in France, 53Paris: Ministère des Affaires Etrangères.
17. Falleth, E. I., Hanssen, G. S. and Saglie, I. L. 2010. Challenges to democracy in market-oriented urban planning in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18: 737-753.
18. Faludi, A. 2001. "The performance of spatial planning". In Towards a New Role for Spatial Planning, Edited by: OECD. 105-132. Paris: Territorial Development OECD Proceedings.
19. Faludi, A. and Van der Valk, A. J. 1994. Rule and Order. The Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Farinos Dasi, J. and Milder, J. 2006. "Evidence of convergence towards a common model of styles of planning in Europe". In Annex to the Final Report of the ESPON Project 2.3.2 Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level, Luxembourg: ESPON.
21. Friedmann, J. 1993. Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59: 482-485.
22. Government's White Paper. 2010. Local Growth: Realising Every Place's Potential, London: The Stationary Office.
23. Greed, C. 2000. Introducing Planning, London: The Athlone Press.
24. Hall, S. and Hickman, P. 2002. Neighbourhood renewal and urban policy: A comparison of new approaches in England and France. Regional Studies, 36: 693
25. Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annales, B, 71: 3-18.
26. Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D. and Vigar, G. 2010. The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, London: Routledge.
27. Heinz, W. 2006. "Öffentlich-private Kooperationsansätze (Public Private Partnerships)-Eine Strategie mit wiederkehrender Relevanz". In Planung neu denken, Edited by: Selle, K. 146-162. Dortmund: Verlag Dorothea Rohn. Bd 1-Zur räumlichen Entwicklung beitragen
28. Jessop, B. 2004. "Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance changes in the European Union as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood". In Multi-Level Governance, Edited by: Bache, I. and Flinders, M. 49-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Josserand, F. 2002. The Spatial and Urban Dimensions in the 2000-06 Objective 2 Programmes: France, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. EPRC Country Report to the European Commission
30. Keil, R. 2009. The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization. City, 13: 230-245.
31. Kleinhenz, G. 2005. Marktwirtschaft und Sozialstaat: Zukunftsmodell für Deutschland. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 43: 33-40.
32. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009. "En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures". In Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 39-62. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
33. Larsson, G. 2006. Spatial Planning Systems in Western Europe, Amsterdam: IOS-Press.
34. Mazet, P. 2000. Aménagement du territoire, Paris: Armand Colin.
35. Nadin, V. and Stead, D. 2008. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP-The Planning Review, 44: 35-47.
36. Newman, P. and Thornley, A. 1996. Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects, London: Routledge.
37. Pahl-Weber, E. and Henckel, D. 2008. The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany, Hanover: Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL). Studies in Spatial Development, No. 7
38. Peck, J. and Tickell, A. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34: 380-404.
39. Priemus, H. 2004. Spatial memorandum 2004: A turning point in the Netherlands' spatial development policy. TESG, 95: 578-583.
40. Pugalis, L. and Townsend, A. 2012. Rescaling of planning and its interface with economic development. Planning Practice and Research, 27
41. Purcell, M. 2009. Resisting neo-liberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?. Planning Theory, 8: 140-165.
42. Ryser, J. and Franchini, T. 2008. International Manual of Planning Practice, The Hague: ISOCARP (International Society of City and Regional Planners).
43. Sager, T. 2009. Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17(1): 65-84.
44. Schubert, K., Heelich, S. and Bazant, U. 2008. "Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme. Stand der Forschung-Theoretisch-methodische Überlegungen". In Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme, Edited by: Schubert, K., Hegelich, S. and Bazant, U. 13-43. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
45. Stead, D. and V., Nadin. 2009. "Planning cultures between models of society and planning systems". In Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 283-300. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
46. Swyngedouw, E. 2007. "Impossible 'sustainability' and the postpolitical condition". In The Sustainable Development Paradox, Edited by: Gibbs, D. and Krueger, R. 13-40. New York: Guilford Press.
47. Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42: 1991-2006.
48. Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F. and Rodriguez, A. 2002. Neo-liberal urbanisation in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34: 380-404.
49. Williams, R. H. 1996. European Union Spatial Policy and Planning, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
50. Woessner, R. 2009. La France: Aménager les territoires, Editions Sedes, Paris: Armand Colin.
51. Zukunftsrat der Bayrischen Landesregierung, c/o Bayrische Staatskanzlei. 2010. Zukunftsfähige Gesellschaft: Bayern in der fortschreitenden Internationalisierung, München: Zukunftsrat der Bayrischen Landesregierung.
52. Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.