Potentials and limitations

The Hand. of Res. Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2nd Ed.

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 561-572

  Cooper, Harris ^a   Hedges, Larry V ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902749222     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. American Educational Research Association. 2006. "Standard for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications." Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association. http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Opportunities/ StandardsforReportingEmpiricalSocialScience-PDF.pdf
2. American Psychological Association (APA) Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2008. "Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology: Why Do We Need Them? What Might They Be?" American Psychologist 63(8): 1-13.
3. Becker, Betsy J. 1996. "The Generalizability of Empirical Research Results." in From Psychometrics to Giftedness: Papers in Honor of Julian Stanley, edited by Camilla P. Benbow and David Lubinsky. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Boruch, Robert, and George Terhanian. 1998. "Cross Design Synthesis." in Advances in Educational Productivity, edited by Douglas M. Windham and David W. Chapman. London: JAI Press.
5. Clarke, Mike, and Andy D. Oxman, eds. 1999. Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 4.0. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration.
6. Cook, Thomas D., Harris Cooper, David S. Cordray, Heidi Hartmann, Larry V. Hedges, Richard R. Light, Thomas A. Louis, and Frederick Mosteller. 1992. Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Cooper, Harris 1982. "Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews." Review of Educational Research 52(2, Summer): 291-302.
8. -. 1986. "On the Social Psychology of Using Integrative Research Reviews: The Case of Desegregation and Black Achievement." in The Social Psychology of Education, edited by Robert Feldman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. -. 2007. Evaluating and Interpreting Research Synthesis in Adult Learning and Literacy. Boston, Mass.: National College Transition Network, New England Literacy Resource Center/World Education, Inc.
10. Cozzens, Susan E. 1981. Users Requirements for Scientific Reviews. Grant report No. IST-7821947. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation.
11. Des Jarlais, Don C, Cynthia Lyons, and Nicole Crepaz. 2004. "Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public health Interventions: The TREND statement." American Journal of Public Health 94(3): 361-66.
12. DuMouchel, Walter H. 1990. "Bayesian Meta-Analysis." in Statistical Methodology in Pharmaceutical Sciences, edited by Donald A. Berry. New York: Marcel Dekker.
13. Eddy, David M., Vic Hasselblad, and Ross Schacter. 1992. Meta-Analysis by the Confidence Profile Method. San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Glass, Gene V. 1976. "Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research." Educational Researcher 5(10): 3-8.
15. Hedges, Larry V. 1998. "Bayesian Meta-Analysis." in Statistical Analysis of Medical Data: New Developments, edited by Brian S. Everitt and Graham Dunn. London: Arnold.
16. Kahn, Khalid S., Gerben Ter Riet, Julie Glanville, Amanda J. Sowden, and Jos Kleijnen. 2000. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. York: University of York, NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination.
17. Little, Roderick J.A., and Donald Rubin, B. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Moher, David, Kenneth F. Schulz, and Douglas G. Altman. 2001. "The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomised Trials." Lancet 357(9263): 1191-94.
19. Ottenbacher, Kenneth, and Harris Cooper. 1984. "The Effects of Class Placement on the Social Adjustment of Mentally Retarded Children." Journal of Research and Development in Education 17: 1-14.
20. Oxman, Andy D., and Gordon H. Guyatt. 1991. "Validation of an Index of the Quality of Review Articles." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 44(11): 1271-78.
21. Peto, Richard. 1987. "Why Do We Need Systematic Overviews of Randomized trials (with Discussion)." Statistics in Medicine 6(3): 233-44.
22. Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Strike, Kenneth, and George Posner. 1983. "Types of Syntheses and Their Criteria." in Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation, edited by Spencer Ward and Linda J. Reed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.
24. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1992. Cross Design Synthesis: A New Strategy for Medical Effectiveness Research. GAO/PEMD No. 92-18. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Valentine, Jeffrey C., and Harris Cooper. 2008. "A Systematic and Transparent Approach for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Intervention Effectiveness Research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD)." Psychological Methods 13(2): 130-49.
26. Wachter, Kenneth W., and Miron L. Straf, eds. 1990. The Future of Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. West, Suzanne, Valerie King, Timothy Carey, Kathleen N. Lohr, Nikki McKoy, Sonya F. Sutton, and Linda Lux. 2002. Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.