Feminism

A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 332-359

  Mansbridge, Jane ^a   Okin, Susan Moller ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Differences among women; Feminist critiques; Ideology; Personal is political; Political movement; Rethinking liberal

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902695925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781405177245.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (159)

1. Ackerley, B. A.: Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
2. Agacinski, S.: ‘The turning point of feminism: Against the effacement of women’, trans. M. Schwartz, in Beyond French Feminisms: Debates of Women, Politics, and Culture in France, 1981-2001, ed. R. Celestin, E. Dal Molin and I. Courtivron (London: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 17-22.
3. Al-Hibri, A. Y.: ‘Is western patriarchal feminism good for Third World women?', in Is Multiculturalism Badfor Women? ed. S. M. Okin et al. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
4. Allen, A.: The Power of Feminist Theory (Boulder, Col.: Westview Press, 1999).
5. Anzaldua, G.: Borderlands: The New Mestiza - La Frontera (San Francisco, Calif.: Spinsters/Aunt Lute, 1987).
6. Arendt, H.: On Revolution (1963) (New York: Viking, 1965).
7. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.: ‘Decisions and non-decisions: an analytic framework’, American Political Science Review, 57 (1963), 632-44.
8. Baer, J. A.: Our Lives Before the Law: Constructing a Feminist Jurisprudence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
9. Baier, A. C: ‘Hume, the woman’s moral theorist?’ (1987) in Feminism and History of Philosophy, ed. G. Lloyd (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
10. Bartlett, K. T.: ‘Feminist legal methods’, Harvard Law Review, 103 (1990), 829-88.
11. Bartlett, K. T.: ‘Gender law’, Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, 1 (1994), 1-18.
12. Basu, A.: The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women’s Movements in Global Perspective (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1995).
13. de Beauvoir, S.: The Second Sex (1949) (New York: Vintage Books, 1989).
14. Becker, M.: ‘Prince Charming: abstract equality’, The Supreme Court Review, 5 (1987), 201-47.
15. Benhabib, S.: ‘The generalized and concrete other’, (1987), in Feminism as Critique, ed. S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).
16. Benhabib, S.: The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).
17. Benhabib, S. et al: Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (New York: Routledge, 1995).
18. Benhabib, S. and Cornell, D.: Feminism as Critique (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).
19. Berg, M.: ‘Luce Irigaray’s “Contradictions”: poststructuralism and feminism’, Signs, 17 (1991), 50-70.
20. Blum, L. A.: ‘Kant and Hegel’s moral rationalism: a feminist perspective’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12 (1982), 287-302.
21. Botting, E. H. and Houser, S. L.: '“Drawing the line of equality”: Hannah Mather Crocker on women’s rights’, American Political Science Review, 100, 2 (2006), 265-78.
22. Brennan, T.: ‘Introduction’, in Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis, ed. T. Brennan (London: Routledge, 1989).
23. Bunch, C: ‘Lesbians in revolt’ (1972), in Passionate Politics (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1987), pp. 161-7.
24. Butler, J.: Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990) (London: Routledge, 1999).
25. Butler, J.: Undoing Gender (London: Routledge, 2004).
26. Calhoun, C: ‘Separating lesbian theory from feminist theory’, Ethics, 104 (1994), 558-81.
27. Carby, H.: Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Novelist (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).
28. Cheah, P. and Grosz, E.: ‘Of Being-Two: Introduction to Irigaray and the political future of sexual difference’, Diacritics, 28, 1 (1998), 3-18.
29. Chodorow, N.: The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1978).
30. Chodorow, N.: ‘Gender, relation and difference in psychoanalytic perspective’ (1979), in Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989).
31. Chun, L.: ‘Finding a language: Feminism and women’s movements in contemporary China’, in Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminisms in International Politics, ed. J. W. Scott, C. Kaplan and D. Keates (New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 11-20.
32. Clement, G.: Care, Autonomy, and Justice: Feminism and the Ethic of Care (Boulder, Col.: Westview Press, 1996).
33. Collins, P. H.: Black Feminist Thought [1st edn 1990], 2nd edn (New York: Routledge, 2000).
34. Cott, N.: ‘Feminist theory and feminist movements’, in What is Feminism? ed. J. Mitchell and A. Oakley (New York: Pantheon, 1986).
35. Crenshaw, K.: ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist polities’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1989), 139-67.
36. Crenshaw, K.: ' “Mapping the margins”: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women’, Stanford Law Review, 43 (1991), 1241-99.
37. Diamond, I. and Orenstein, G. F., eds: Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism (San Francisco, Calif.: Sierra Club Books, 1990).
38. Dietz, M. G.: ‘Citizenship with a feminist face: the problem with maternal thinking’, Political Theory, 13 (1985), 19-37.
39. Dinnerstein, D.: The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise (New York: Harper Colophon, 1977).
40. Di Stefano, C: ‘Autonomy in the light of difference’, in Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory, ed. N. J. Hirschmann and C.Di Stefano (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1996).
41. le Doeuff, M.: Hipparchia’s Choice (1989), trans. T. Selous (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
42. Eagly, A. H. and Steffen, V. J.: ‘Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1984), 735-54.
43. Echols, A.: Daring to be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967-1975 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).
44. Eisenberg, N. and Lennon, R.: ‘Sex differences in empathy and related capacities’, Psychological Bulletin, 94 (1983), 100-31.
45. Elshtain, J. B.: Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).
46. Elster, J.: Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
47. Emmett, D.: ‘The concept of power’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 54 (1953-54), 1-26.
48. Epstein, C. F.: Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender and the Social Order (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, 1988).
49. Feree, M. M.: ‘German unification and feminist identity’, in Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminismsinlnternational Politics, ed. J. W. Scott, C. Kaplan andD. Keates (New York: Routledge 1997), pp. 46-55.
50. Fineberg, J.: Harm to Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).
51. Fischer, A. H., ed.: Gender and Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
52. Flanagan, O. and Jackson, K.: ‘Justice, care and gender: the Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited’, Ethics, 97(1987), 622-37.
53. Follett, M. P.: ‘Power’ (1935), in Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, ed. H. C. Metcalf (New York: Harper, 1942).
54. Ford, M. R. and Lowery, C. R.: ‘Gender differences in moral reasoning: a comparison of the use of justice and care orientations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (1986), 777-83.
55. Foucault, M.: ‘Prison talk’ (1975), in Power/Knowledge, ed. C. Gordon (New York: Pantheon, 1980).
56. Fräser, N.: ‘Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’, Social Text, 25/26 (1990), 56-80.
57. Fräser, N.: ‘Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation’, in Redistribution or Recognition? ed. N. Fraser and A. Honneth (London: Verso, 2003).
58. Friedman, M.: ‘The practice of partiality’, Ethics, 101 (1991), 818-35.
59. Fuss, D.: Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference (New York: Routledge, 1989).
60. Gallup Organization: The Gallup Poll, ‘Minority Rights and Relations’, Question 30 (6/11/2001-6/17/2001).
61. Garcia, A. M., ed.: Chicana Feminist Thought: The Bask Historical Writings (New York: Routledge, 1997).
62. Gilligan, C: In a Different Voice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).
63. Gilligan, C. et al.: Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women’s Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988).
64. Gould, C: ‘The woman question: philosophy of liberation and the liberation of philosophy’, in Women and Philosophy: Toward a Theory of Liberation, ed. C. Gould and M. W. Wartofsky (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1976), pp. 5-44.
65. Grimshaw, J.: Philosophy and Feminist Thinking (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986).
66. Halberstam, J.: Female Masculinity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998).
67. Hammonds, E. M: ‘When the margin is the center: African-American feminism(s) and “difference” ', in Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminisms in International Poütics, ed. J. W. Scott, C. Kaplan and D. Keates (London: Routledge, 1997).
68. Harding, S. and Narayan, U. eds: Border Crossings: Multicultural and Postcolonial Feminist Challenges to Philosophy, parts 1 & 2 (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1998.)
69. Harris, A.: ‘Race and essentialism in legal theory’, Stanford Law Review, 42 (1990), 581-616.
70. Hartsock, N.: ‘Political change: Two perspectives on power’ (1974), in Building Feminist Theory: Essays from Quest, ed. C. Bunch (New York: Longman, 1981).
71. Hartsock, N.: Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism (New York: Longman, 1983).
72. Held, V.: ‘Mothering versus contract’, in Beyond Self-Interest, ed. J. J. Mansbridge (Chicago, 111.: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 287-304.
73. Held, V.: The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
74. Higgins, T. E.: ‘Reviving the public/private distinction in feminist theorizing’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75 (2000), 847-67.
75. Hirschmann, N. J.: ‘Freedom, recognition and obligation: A feminist approach to political theory’, American Political Science Review, 83 (1989), 1227-14.
76. Hirschmann, N. J.: The Subject of Liberty: Toward A Feminist Theory of Freedom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).
77. Hirschmann, N. J. and Di Stefano, C, eds: Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1996)
78. Hyde, J. S.: Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women (Boston, Mass.: Houghton-Mifflin, 2006).
79. Irigaray, L.: This Sex Which is Not One (1977), trans. C. Porter with C. Burke (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985a).
80. Irigaray, L.: Speculum of the Other Woman (1974), trans. L. C. Gill (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985b).
81. Irigaray, L.: ‘Gesture in psychoanalysis’, in Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis, ed. T. Brennan (London: Routledge, 1989).
82. Irigaray, L.: I Love to You, trans. A. Martin (New York: Routledge, 1996).
83. Irigaray, L.: ‘Preface’, in L. Iragary, ed., Luce Iragary: Key Writings (London: Continuum, 2004).
84. Jaggar, A. M.: Feminist Politics and Human Nature (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1983).
85. Kant, I.: Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime, (1763), trans. J. Goldthwait (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1960).
86. Kant, I.: Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals (1785), trans. T. K. Abbott (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1949).
87. Kathlene, L.: ‘In a different voice: women and the policy process’, in Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. S. Thomas and C. Wilcox (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).
88. Kittay, E. F. and Feder, E. K., eds: The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002).
89. Klinger, C. and Nagl-Docekal, H., eds: Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective (University Park, Penn.: Penn State University Press, 2000).
90. Kohlberg, L.: The Philosophy of Moral Development (San Francisco, Calif.: Harper and Row, 1981).
91. Kristeva, J: ‘Woman can never be defined’ (1974), New French Feminisms, trans. M. A. August, ed. E. Marks and I. de Courtiveron (New York: Schoken, 1981a).
92. Kristeva, J: ‘Women’s time’ (1979), trans. A. Jardine and H. Blake, Signs, 7 (1981b), 13-35.
93. Landes, J. B.: Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).
94. Lange, L., ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (University Park, Penn.: Penn State University Press, 2002).
95. Longino, H.: The Fate of Knowledge (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).
96. Lukes, S.: Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
97. MacKinnon, C. A.: Feminism Unmodified (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
98. MacKinnon, C. A.: Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).
99. MacKinnon, C. A.: Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).
100. Mansbridge, J. J.: ‘Feminism and democratic community’, in Democratic Community: Nomos XXXV, ed. J. W. Chapman and I. Shapiro (New York: New York University Press, 1993).
101. Mansbridge, J. J.: ‘Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”', Journal of Politics, 61 (1999), 627-57.
102. Mansbridge, J. J.: ‘Cracking through hegemonic ideology: the logic of formal justice’, Socialjustice Research, 18, 3 (2005), 335-47.
103. McClintock, M. K., Jacob, S., Zelano, B. and Heyreh, D. J. S.: ‘Pheromones and vasanas: The function of social chemosignals’, in Evolutionary Psychology and Motivation, ed. J. A. French, A. C. Kamil and S. W. Leger (Lincoln, Nebr: University of Nebraska Press, 2001).
104. Meyers, D. T.: Self, Society, and Personal Choice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).
105. Minow, M.: ‘Justice engendered: foreword to the Supreme Court 1986 term’, Harvard Law Review, 101 (1987), 10-95.
106. Mohanty, C. T., ‘Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’, in Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, ed. C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo and L. Torres (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1991).
107. Mohanty, C. T.: ‘Under Western eyes revisited’, in Feminism without Borders (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).
108. Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A. and Torres, L., eds: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1991).
109. Molyneux, M. ‘Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, state and revolution in Nicaragua’, Feminist Studies, 11 (1985), 227-54.
110. Molyneux, M:. Women’s Movements in International Perspective (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
111. Murdock, G. P. and Provost, C: ‘Factors in the division of labor by sex’, Ethnology, 12 (1973).
112. Narayan, U.: Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism (London: Routledge, 1997).
113. Narayan, U.: ‘Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism’, in Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World, ed. U. Narayan and S. Harding (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 2000).
114. Nedelsky, J.: ‘Reconceiving autonomy’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1 (1989), 7-36.
115. Nussbaum, M.: ‘Adaptive preferences and women’s options’, Economics and Philosophy, 17 (2001), 67-88.
116. Offen, K.: ‘Defining feminism: A comparative historical approach’, Signs, 15 (1988), 119-57.
117. Okin, S. M.: Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
118. Okin, S. M.: ‘Thinking like a woman’, in Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, ed. D. L. Rhode (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990).
119. Okin, S. M.: ‘Sexual difference, feminism, and the law’, Law and Social Inquiry, 16 (1991), 553-73.
120. Okin, S. M.: ‘Feminism, women’s human rights, and cultural differences’, Hypatia, 13, 2 (1998), 32-52.
121. Okin, S. M.: Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
122. Paidar, P.: ‘Encounters between feminism, democracy, and reformism in contemporary Iran’, in Gender Justice, Development, and Rights, ed. M. Molyneux and S. Razavi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
123. Pateman, C: The Sexual Contract (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1988).
124. Pateman, C: The Disorder of Women (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1989).
125. Phillips, A.: The Politics of Presence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
126. Phillips, A.: ‘Multiculturalism, universalism, and the claims of democracy’, in Gender Justice, Development, and Rights, ed. M. Molyneux and S. Razavi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
127. Phillips, A.: ‘Dilemmas of gender and culture: the judge, the democrat and the political activist’, in Minorities within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity, ed. A. Eisenberg and J. Spinner Halev (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 113-34.
128. Rhode, D.: Justice and Gender (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).
129. Rich, A.: ‘Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence’, Signs, 5 (1980), 631-60.
130. Rosenfeld, R. and Kalleberg, A.: ‘Gender inequality in the labor market’, Acta Sociologica, 34 (1991), 207-25.
131. Rossi, A.: ‘A biosocial perspective on parenting’, Daedelus, 106 (1977), 1-3.
132. Sandel, M.: Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
133. Sandoval, C: Methodology of the Oppressed (1991) (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2000).
134. Schor, N.: ‘This essentialism which is not one’, in Engaging with Irigaray, ed. C. Burke, N. Schor and M. Whitford (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).
135. Shachar, A.: Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
136. Shaheed, F. ‘Controlled or autonomous: Identity and the experience of the network, women living under Muslim laws’, Signs, 19 (1994), 997-1020.
137. Shanley, M. L. and Pateman, C., eds: Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory (University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991).
138. Sher, G.: ‘Other voices, other rooms? Women’s psychology and moral theory’, in Women and Moral Theory, ed. E. F. Kittay andD. T. Meyers (Totowa, NJ: Rowman &Littlefield, 1987).
139. Simmel, G.: Conflict (1908), trans. K. H. Wolff (New York: Free Press, 1955).
140. Song, S.: ‘Majority norms, multiculturalism, and gender equality’, American Political Science Review, 99, 4 (2005), 473-89.
141. Spelman, E. V.: Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1988).
142. Spivak, G. C: ‘Can the subaltern speak?', in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (Urbana, 111.: University of Illinois Press, 1988).
143. Spivak, G. C: ‘In a word. Interview’ (with Ellen Rooney) (1989), in Outside in the Teaching Machine (New York: Routledge, 1993).
144. Spivak, G. C: ‘Subaltern talk: interview with the editors’ (1993-4), in The Spivak Reader, ed. D. Landry and G. MacLean (New York: Routledge, 1996).
145. Springer, K.: ‘Third wave black feminism?', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27 (2002), 1059-82.
146. Stryker, S.: '(De)subjugated knowledges: an introduction to transgender studies’, in The Transgender Studies Reader, ed. S. Stryker and T. Whittle (New York: Routledge, 2006).
147. Sunder Rajan, R.: The Scandal of the State: Women, Law, and Citizenship in Postcolonial India (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).
148. Taylor, C: Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).
149. Tronto, J. C: ‘Care as a political concept’, in Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Philosophy, ed. N. J. Hirschmann and C. Di Stefano (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1996).
150. Walker, A.: In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens (San Diego, Calif.: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1983).
151. Wallace, M.: ‘Anger in isolation: a black feminist’s search for sisterhood’ (1975), in Invisibility Blues (New York: Verso, 1990).
152. Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L.: Measuring Sex Stereotypes (Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982).
153. Williams, M.: Voice, Trust, and Memory:Marginalized Groupsandthe Fai Ungs of Liberal Representation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1998).
154. Wood, W. and Eagly, A. H.: ‘A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences’, Psychological Bulletin, 128 (2002), 699-727.
155. Young, I. M.: ‘Impartiality and the civic public’, in Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender, ed. S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987).
156. Spivak, G. C: Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).
157. Spivak, G. C: ‘Gender as seriality: thinking about women as a social collective’ (1994), in Intersecting Voices (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).
158. Spivak, G. C: Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
159. Zinn, M. B. and Dill, B. T.: ‘Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism’, Feminist Studies, 22, 2 (1996), 321-31.