Long-range orientation and atomic attachment of nanocrystals in 2D honeycomb superlattices

Science

Volumn 344, Issue 6190, 2014, Pages 1377-1380

  Boneschanscher, M P ^a   Evers, W H ^b,c   Geuchies, J J ^a   Altantzis, T ^d   Goris, B ^d   Rabouw, F T ^a   Van Rossum, S A P ^a   Van Der Zant, H S J ^c   Siebbeles, L D A ^b   Van Tendeloo, G ^d   Swart, I ^a   Hilhorst, J ^e   Petukhov, A V ^a   Bals, S ^d   Vanmaekelbergh, D ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^e EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADMIUM SELENIDE; CHALCOGEN; CHALCOGENIDE; GRAPHENE; LEAD; METAL NANOPARTICLE; NANOCRYSTAL; QUANTUM DOT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CARBON; CRYSTAL; GEOMETRY; LONG RANGE TRANSPORT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORIENTATION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; CATION EXCHANGE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON DIFFRACTION; GEOMETRY; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMICONDUCTOR; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

EID: 84902658777     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1252642     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. C. Pacholski, A. Kornowski, H. Weller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 41, 1188-1191 (2002).
2. K.-S. Cho, D. V. Talapin, W. Gaschler, C. B. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7140-7147 (2005).
3. W. K. Koh, A. C. Bartnik, F. W. Wise, C. B. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3909-3913 (2010).
4. C. Schliehe et al., Science 329, 550-553 (2010).
5. W. H. Evers et al., Nano Lett. 13, 2317-2323 (2013).
6. E. Kalesaki et al., Phys. Rev. X 4, 011010 (2014).
7. Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
8. H. Friedrich et al., Nano Lett. 9, 2719-2724 (2009).
9. M. P. Boneschanscher et al., Nano Lett. 13, 1312-1316 (2013).
10. P. A. Midgley, M. Weyland, Ultramicroscopy 96, 413-431 (2003).
11. The PbSe honeycombs suffer from beam damage, making it hard to obtain high-quality tomographic reconstructions. CdSe, on the other hand, is more stable under the electron beam, resulting in higher-quality tomographic reconstructions (Fig. 3 as compared with fig. S9, for example. Both images are obtained under the same conditions).
12. D. Li et al., Science 336, 1014-1018 (2012).
13. M. A. van Huis et al., Nano Lett. 8, 3959-3963 (2008).
14. M. A. van Huis et al., Adv. Mater. 21, 4992-4995 (2009).
15. J. M. Yuk et al., Science 336, 61-64 (2012).
16. J. M. Yuk et al., Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 49, 11479-11481 (2013).
17. A. H. Castro Neto, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109-162 (2009).
18. K. K. Gomes, W. Mar, W. Ko, F. Guinea, H. C. Manoharan, Nature 483, 306-310 (2012).
19. G. De Simoni et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 132113 (2010).
20. M. Gibertini et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 241406 (2009).
21. C.-H. Park, S. G. Louie, Nano Lett. 9, 1793-1797 (2009).
22. C.-H. Park, L. Yang, Y.-W. Son, M. L. Cohen, S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 126804 (2008).
23. A. Singha et al., Science 332, 1176-1179 (2011).
24. J. M. Luther, H. Zheng, B. Sadtler, A. P. Alivisatos, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 16851-16857 (2009).
25. B. J. Beberwyck, Y. Surendranath, A. P. Alivisatos, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 19759-19770 (2013).
26. S. Bals et al., Nano Lett. 11, 3420-3424 (2011).
27. M. Casavola et al ., Chem. Mater. 24, 294-302 (2012).