Experience of structural onlay allografts for the treat ment of bone deficiency in revision total hip art hroplasty

Scandinavian Journal of Surgery

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 265-270

  Mokka, J ^a   Keemu, H ^a   Koivisto, M ^b   Stormi, T ^b   Vahlberg, T ^b   Virolainen, P ^a   Junnila, M ^a   Seppanen M ^a   Makela K T ^a  

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone stock deficiency; Infection; Loosening; Perioperative periprosthetic fracture; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Structural onlay allograft

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DEVICES; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGERY; TIBIA; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLOGRAFTS; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIBIA; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84902654333     PISSN: 14574969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1457496913491208     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mäkelä KT, Peltola M, Sund R et al: Regional and hospital variance in performance of total hip and knee replacements: A national population-based study. Ann Med 2011;43(Suppl. 1): 31-38.
2. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS et al: Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:14-21.
3. Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS et al: Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:2050-2060.
4. Emerson RH, Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD et al: Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;285:35-44.
5. Head WC, Emerson RH, Cuellar AD: Cortical strut allografts for femoral reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 1993;4:9-15.
6. Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C et al: Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;387:148-155.
7. Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR et al: Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:346-354.
8. Head WC, Malinin TI, Emerson RH Jr, et al: Restoration of bone stock in revision surgery of the femur. Int Orthop 2000;24:9-14.
9. Gross AE, Wong PK, Hutchison CR et al: Onlay cortical strut grafting in revision arthroplasty of the hip. J Arthroplasty 2003;18(Suppl. 1):104-106.
10. Kim YH, Kim JS: Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:454-459.
11. Otte S, Fitzek J, Wedemeyer C et al: Reinforcement of deficient femur with inlay strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty: A small series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:649-653.
12. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ et al: Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:705-715.
13. Virolainen P, Mokka J, Seppänen M et al: Up to 10 years follow up of the use of 71 cortical allografts (strut-grafts) for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. Scand J Surg 2010;99:240-243.
14. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG: The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;420:55-62.
15. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J: Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;369:230-242.
16. Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N et al: Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2499-2507.
17. Ornstein E, Linder L, Ranstam J et al: Femoral impaction grafting with the Exeter stem-The Swedish experience: Survivorship analysis of 1305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:441-446.
18. Kerboull L, Hamadouche M, Kerboull M: Impaction grafting in association with the Charnley-Kerboull cemented femoral component: Operative technique and two- to 16-year follow-up results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:304-309.
19. Lamberton TD, Kenny PJ, Whitehouse SL et al: Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: A follow-up of 540 hips. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1154-1160.
20. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ et al: Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:535-540.
21. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP: The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique. A cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:759-764.
22. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepistö J et al: Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:103-107.
23. Sewell MD, Hanna SA, Carrington RW et al: Modular proximal femoral replacement in salvage hip surgery for non-neoplastic conditions. Acta Orthop Belg 2010;76:493-502.
24. Gebert C, Wessling M, Götze C et al: The Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery. Int Orthop 2010;34:1261-1265.