Comparative radiation exposure using standard fluoroscopy versus cone-beam computed tomography for posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 14, 2014, Pages

  O'Donnell, Courtney ^a   Maertens, Andrew ^a   Bompadre, Viviana ^b   Wagner, Theodore A ^a,b   Krengel, Walter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cone beam CT; Fluoroscopy; Intraoperative CT; Radiation exposure; Surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION RESPONSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; MALE; PROCEDURES; SCOLIOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84902544564     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000363     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, et al. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine 2013;28:306-12
2. Tormenti MJ, Kostov DB, Gardner PA, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:11
3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84. (Pubitemid 350190758
4. Wagner TA, Lai SM, Asher MA, et al. SRS surgeon members' risk for thyroid cancer: Is it increased?". Hibbs Award Nominee for Best Clinical Paper. SRS Meet Abstr 2006. Paper 40
5. Hicks J, Singla A, Shen FH, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fi xation in scoliosis surgery: A systematic review. Spine 2010;35:465-70
6. Foxx KC, Kwak RC, Latzman JM. A retrospective analysis of pedicle screws in contact with the great vessels. J Neurosurg: Spine 2010;13:401-2
7. Ege T, Bilgic S, Koca K, et al. Fluoroscopy for transpedicular screw placement in scoliosis: To what extent can radiation exposure be reduced by the freehand technique?. Turkish Neurosurg 2013;23:344-8
8. Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fl uoroscopy vs. computer-Assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;25:532-7
9. Kepler CK, Pavlov H, Kim HJ, et al. Preoperative templating before spinal fusion using a fl uoroscopic multiplanar imaging system is as accurate as CT scan and uses substantially less radiation. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:67-71
10. Abul-Kasim K, Söderberg M, Selariu E, et al. Optimization of radiation exposure and image quality of the cone-beam O-Arm intraoperative imaging system in spinal surgery. J Spinal Dis Tech 2011;25:52-8
11. Petersen AG, Eiskjær S, Kaspersen J. Dose optimisation for intraoperative cone-beam fl at-detector CT in paediatric spinal surgery. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:965-73
12. Van De Kelft E, Costa E, Van Der Planken D, et al. A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-Arm imaging system and StealthStation Navigation. Spine 2012;37:1580-7
13. Le Heron JC. Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical X-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-Area product. Phys Med Biol 1992;37:2117-26
14. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254-63
15. Tabaraee E, Gibson AG, Karahalios DG, et al. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fl uoroscopy (C-ARM): A cadaveric study comparing accuracy, effi ciency, and safety for spinal instrumentation. Spine 2013;38:1953-8
16. Khorshand D, Song K, Swanson J, et al. Iatrogenic radiation exposure to patients with early-onset spine and chest wall deformities. Spine 2013;38:E1108-14
17. Goldberg M, Mayo N, Levy A, et al. Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Epidemiology 1998;9:271-8. (Pubitemid 28194235
18. Bone CM, Hsieh GH. The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopaedic patients. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:251-4. (Pubitemid 30140660
19. Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr, Vitale MG, et al. Pediatric pedicle screws: Comparative effectiveness and safety: A systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Task Force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1227-34
20. Lee CI, McLean D, Robinson J. Measurement of effective dose for paediatric scoliotic patients. Radiography 2005;11:89-97
21. Manon B, Bouyer B, Vialle R. Infections after spinal correction and fusion for spinal deformities in childhood and adolescence. Int Orthop 2011;36:465-9.