A tertiary gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy

Journal of Urology

Volumn 192, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 97-102

  Adam, Meike ^a   Hannah, Amir ^a   Budäus, Lars ^a   Steuber, Thomas ^a   Salomon, Georg ^a   Michl, Uwe ^a   Haese, Alexander ^a   Fisch, Margit ^a   Wittmer, Corinna ^a   Steurer, Stefan ^a   Minner, Sarah ^a   Heinzer, Hans ^a   Huland, Hartwig ^a   Graefen, Markus ^a   Sauter, Guido ^a   Schlomm, Thorsten ^a   Isbarn, Hendrik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

local; neoplasm grading; neoplasm recurrence; prostate; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; SURVIVAL RATE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CANCER GRADING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE INVASION; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; SEMINAL VESICLE INVASION; TERTIARY GLEASON PATTERN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR INVASION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84902536245     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. Heidenreich, G. Aus, and M. Bolla et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer Eur Urol 53 2008 68
2. J. Walz, F.K. Chun, and E.A. Klein et al. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 181 2009 601
3. A.J. Stephenson, P.T. Scardino, and J.A. Eastham et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 23 2005 7005
4. H.G. Sim, D. Telesca, and S.H. Culp et al. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence J Urol 179 2008 1775
5. B.J. Trock, C.C. Guo, and M.L. Gonzalgo et al. Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system J Urol 182 2009 1364
6. I.M. van Oort, B.M. Schout, and L.A. Kiemeney et al. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer? Eur Urol 48 2005 572
7. K. Hashine, A. Yuasa, and K. Shinomori et al. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy Jpn J Clin Oncol 41 2011 571
8. L.D. True Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland. Practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists Am J Clin Pathol 102 1994 572
9. D.F. Gleason, and G.T. Mellinger Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging J Urol 111 1974 58
10. C.C. Pan, S.R. Potter, and A.W. Partin et al. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system Am J Surg Pathol 24 2000 563
11. J.L. Eble, G. Sauter, and J.I. Epstein et al. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs 2004 IARC Lyon 359
12. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Allsbrook, and M.B. Amin et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 29 2005 1228
13. A. Briganti, F.K. Chun, and A. Salonia et al. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy Eur Urol 49 2006 1019
14. H. Isbarn, S.A. Ahyai, and F.K. Chun et al. Prevalence of a tertiary Gleason grade and its impact on adverse histopathologic parameters in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series Eur Urol 55 2009 394
15. J.I. Epstein, Z. Feng, and B.J. Trock et al. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades Eur Urol 61 2012 1019
16. E.M. Hattab, M.O. Koch, and J.N. Eble et al. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma J Urol 175 2006 1695
17. E. Servoll, T. Saeter, and L. Vlatkovic et al. Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer BJU Int 109 2012 1489
18. P. Turker, E. Bas, and S. Bozkurt et al. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival Urol Oncol 31 2013 93
19. C.A. Mosse, C. Magi-Galluzzi, and T. Tsuzuki et al. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens Am J Surg Pathol 28 2004 394
20. C.R. Pound, A.W. Partin, and M.A. Eisenberger et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy JAMA 281 1999 1591