Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 571-576

  Hashine, Katsuyoshi ^a   Yuasa, Akihito ^a   Shinomori, Kensuke ^a   Shirato, Akitomi ^a   Ninomiya, Iku ^a   Teramoto, Norihiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION SHIKOKU CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Oncological outcome; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Rate of Gleason pattern 5; Tertiary Gleason pattern

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; GLEASON PATTERN 5; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TERTIARY GLEASON PATTERN 5; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953763675     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq250     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL, Carlson RE, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, et al. The impact of PSMs on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 2010;183:1003-9.
2. Bianco FJ, Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Klein EA, Eastham JA, Pontes JE, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010;183:977-82.
3. Uhlman MA, Sun L, Stackhouse DA, Caire AA, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, et al. Tumor volume, tumor percentage involvement, or prostate volume: which is predictive of prostate-specific antigen recurrence? Urology 2010;75:460-6.
4. Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 2008;102:1413-8.
5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037-63.
6. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Eisenberger M, Dorey FJ, Walsh PC, et al. Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1765-71.
7. Cheng L, Davidson DD, Lin H, Koch MO. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2007;110:1967-72.
8. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Eisenberger M, Partin AW. Time to prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy and risk of prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 2006;176:1404-8.
9. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Eisenberger M, Dorey FJ, Walsh PC, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2005;294:433-9.
10. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228-42.
11. Mosse CA, Magi-Galluzzi C, Tsuzuki T, Epstein JI. The prognostic prostatectomy of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:394-8.
12. Isbarn H, Ahyai SA, Chun FKH, Budaus L, Schlomm T, Salomon G, et al. Prevalence of tertiary Gleason grade and its impact on adverse histopathologic parameters in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series. Eur Urol 2009;55:394-403.
13. van Oort IM, Schout BM, Kiemeney LA, Hulsbergen CA, Witjes JA. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer? Eur Urol 2005;48:572-76.
14. Trock BJ, Guo CC, Gonzalgo ML, Magheli A, Loeb S, Epstein JI. Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system. J Urol 2009;182:1364-70.
15. Mizuno R, Nakashima J, Mukai M, Okita H, Kosugi M, Kikuchi E, et al. Tumour length of the largest focus predicts prostate-specific antigen-based recurrence after radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009;104:1215-8.
16. Rasiah KK, Stricker PD, Haynes A, Delprado W, Tumer JJ, Golovsky D, et al. Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:2560-5.
17. Hattab EM, Koch MO, Eble JN, Lin H, Cheng L. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2006;175:1695-99.
18. Sim HG, Telesca D, Culp SH, Ellis WJ, Lange PH, True LD, et al. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence. J Urol 2008;179:1775- 9.
19. Whittemore DE, Hick EJ, Carter MR, Moul JW, Miranda-Sousa AJ, Sexton WJ. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2008;179:516-22.
20. Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004;34:463-8.
21. Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int 2005;95:766-71.
22. Walz J, Burnett AL, Castello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, et al. A critical analysis of current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:179-92.