Integrative review: Concepts and methods used in nursing

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 335-345

  Soares, Cassia Baldini ^a   Hoga, Luiza Akiko Komura ^a   Peduzzi, Marina ^a   Sangaleti, Carine ^b   Yonekura, Tatiana ^a   Silva, Deborah Rachel Audebert Delage ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO CENTRO OESTE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Evidence based practice; Nursing care; Nursing research; Review measurements, methods and theories

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW; STANDARD;

NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH;

EID: 84902486731     PISSN: 00806234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000020     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108.
2. Watson J, Smith MC. Caring science and the science of unitary human beings: a trans-theoretical discourse for nursing knowledge development. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37(5):452-61.
3. Flemming K. The knowledge base for evidence-based nursing: a role for mixed methods research? ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007;30(1):41-51.
4. Lacerda RA, Egry EY, Fonseca RMGS, Lopes NA, Nunes BK, Batista AO, et al. Evidence-based practices published in Brazil: identification and analysis studies about human health prevention. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2013 Mar 25];46 (5):1237-47. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v46n5/en_28.pdf
5. Weaver K, Olson JK. Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(4):459-69.
6. Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein (São Paulo). 2010;8(1):102-6.
7. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-53.
8. Jackson GB. Methods for integrative reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1980;50(3):438-60.
9. Cooper HM. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52(2):291-302.
10. Cooper HM. The integrative research review: a systematic approach. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1984.
11. Ganong LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10(1):1-11.
12. Ellis MV. Conducting and reporting integrative research reviews: accumulating scientific knowledge. Couns Educ Superv. 1991;30(3):225-36.
13. Broome ME. Integrative literature review for the development of concepts. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA. Concept development in nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993. p. 231-50.
14. Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research: an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(5):977-84.
15. Stetler CB, Morsi D, Rucki S, Broughton S, Corrigan B, Fitzgerald J, et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11(4):195-206.
16. Beyea S, Nicoll LH. Writing an integrative review. AORN J. 1998;67(4):877-80.
17. Roman AR, Friedlander MR. Integrative research review applied to nursing. Cogitare Enferm. 1998;3(2):109-12.
18. Whittemore R. Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nurs Res. 2005;54(1):56-62.
19. Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4(3):356-67.
20. Russell CL. An overview of the integrative research review. Prog Transplant. 2005;15(1):8-13.
21. Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64.
22. Pompeo DA, Rossi LA, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: etapa inicial do processo de validação de diagnóstico de enfermagem. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009;22(4):434-8.
23. Carliner S. Workshop in conducting integrative literature reviews. In: IEEE International Professional Communication Conference; 2011 Oct 17-19; Cincinnati, OH, USA [Internet]. [cited Mar 25]. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=06087203
24. Taveggia T. Resolving research controversy through empirical cumulation. Sociol Methods Res. 1974;2(4):395-407.
25. Cooper HM. Synthetizing research: a guide for literature reviews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
26. Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(4):553-60.
27. Kearney MH. Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(2):145-53.
28. Paterson BL, Thorne BL, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research: a practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
29. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifyng the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(7):905-23.
30. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(4):365-71.