An overview of the integrative research review

Progress in Transplantation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 8-13

  Russell, Cynthia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; REVIEW; TRANSPLANTATION; VALIDITY; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY;

RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 19844383995     PISSN: 15269248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152692480501500102     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Cooper HM. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Rexiews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
2. Broome ME. Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. In: Rogers B, Knafl K, eds. Concept Development in Nursing. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000:231-250.
3. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 2004.
4. Beyea SC, Nicoll LH. Writing an integrative review. AORN. 1998;67:877-880.
5. Stevens K. Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice. AACN Clin Issues. 2001;12:529-538.
6. American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association Publication Manual. 5th ed. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association; 2001.
7. Ganong LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10:1-11.
8. Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Compliance With Therapeutic Regimens. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1976.
9. Cooper HM. Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1989.
10. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
11. Chisholm MA, Vollenweider LJ, Mulloy LL, et al. Renal transplant patient compliance with free immunosuppressive medications. Transplantation. 2000;70:1240-1244.
12. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 1998;52:377-384.
13. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: No. 47. Systems for Rating the Quality of Individual Articles. AHCPR Web site. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epcsums/ strengthsum.htm#Rating. Accessed April 24, 2004.
14. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: No. 47. Systems for Rating the Quality of Individual Articles: Summary. AHCPR Web site. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic /epcsums/strength2.htm. Accessed April 24, 2004.
15. Estabrooks C, Goes V, Thiel E, Pinfold P, Sawka C, Williams I. Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6:170-182.