Carbon capture simulation initiative: A case study in multiscale modeling and new challenges

Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages 301-323

  Miller, David C ^a   Syamlal, Madhava ^b   Mebane, David S ^c   Storlie, Curt ^d   Bhattacharyya, Debangsu ^e   Sahinidis, Nikolaos V ^f   Agarwal, Deb ^g   Tong, Charles ^h   Zitney, Stephen E ^b   Sarkar, Avik ⁱ   Sun, Xin ⁱ   Sundaresan, Sankaran ^j   Ryan, Emily ^k   Engel, Dave ⁱ   Dale, Crystal ^d  

^a NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^c West Virginia University ^*  (United States)

^d West Virginia University   (United States)

^e LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^h LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁱ PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^j Princeton University   (United States)

^k Boston University   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Optimization; Process control; Process synthesis; Risk analysis; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; FLUID DYNAMICS; THERMODYNAMICS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADVANCED DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC PROCESS; MULTI-SCALE MODELING; NATIONAL LABORATORY; PROCESS SYNTHESIS; PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTIES; THERMODYNAMICS AND KINETICS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS; ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; PROCESS CONTROL;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ALGORITHM; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDRODYNAMICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; KINETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS SYNTHESIS; RISK ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION;

ALGORITHMS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDRODYNAMICS; KINETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84902474546     PISSN: 19475438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040321     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Chu S. 2009. Carbon capture and sequestration. Science 325:1599
2. Chu S,Majumdar A. 2012. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488:294-303
3. Rubin ES. 2008. CO2 capture and transport. Elements 4:311-17
4. Ciferno JP, Fout TE, Jones AP, Murphy JT. 2009. Capturing carbon from existing coal-fired power plants. Chem. Eng. Prog. April:33-41
5. Jenkins J, Mansur S. 2011. Bridging the Clean Energy Valleys of Death. Oakland, CA: Breakthrough Inst. http://thebreakthrough.org/archive/bridging-The- clean-energy-vall
6. Haszeldine RS. 2009. Carbon capture and storage: How green can black be Science 325:1647-52. doi:10.1126/science.1172246
7. HulesKR, Yilmaz A. 2002. From bunker to stack: the cost-reduction and problem-solving benefits of computational fluid dynamics for utility and industrial power generation. Presented at POWER-GEN Int., Orlando, FL
8. Syamlal M, Guenther C, Cugini A, Ge W, Wang W, et al. 2011. Computational science: enabling technology development. CEP Magazine, January
9. Mebane DS, Bhat KS, Kress JD, Fauth DJ, Gray ML, et al. 2013. Bayesian calibration of thermodynamic models for the uptake of CO2 in supported amine sorbents using ab initio priors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15:4355-66
10. US Energy Inf. Adm. 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Early Release Overview. Report no. DOE/EIA-0383ER, US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/pdf/0383er%282013%29.pdf
11. Nichols C. 2010. Coal-fired power plants in the United States: examination of the cost of retrofitting with CO2 capture technology and the potential for improvements in efficiency. Report no. DOE/NETL-402/102309, US Dep. Energy, Natl. Energy Technol. Lab., Pittsburgh, PA
12. Sjostrom S, Krutka H. 2010. Evaluation of solid sorbents as a retrofit technology for CO2 capture. Fuel 89:1298-306
13. Sjostrom S. 2010. Evaluation of solid sorbents as a retrofit technology for CO2 capture. Presented at 2010NETL CO2 Capture Technol. Meet., Pittsburgh, PA
14. Kim H, Haranczyk M, Epperly T, Abouelnasr M, Swisher JA, et al. 2012. Integrating the carbon capture materials database with the process simulation tools of the carbon capture simulation initiative. Presented at AIChE Annu. Meet., Pittsburgh, PA
15. LeeA,MebaneD, Fauth DJ, MillerDC. 2011.Amodel for the adsorption kinetics ofCO2 on amine-impregnated mesoporous sorbents in the presence of water. Presented at 28th Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf., Pittsburgh, PA
16. Salciccioli M, Stamatakis M, Caratzoulas S, Vlachos DG. 2011. A review of multiscale modeling of metalcatalyzed reactions: Mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66:4319-55
17. Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A. 2001. Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 63:425-50
18. Higdon D, Kennedy MC, Cavendish JC, Cafeo JA, Ryne RD. 2004. Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26:448-66
19. Reich BJ, Storlie CB,BondellHD.2009. Variable selection inBayesian smoothing splineANOVAmodels: Application to deterministic computer codes. Technometrics 51:110-20
20. Miller DC, Sahinidis NV, Cozad A, Lee A, Kim H, et al. 2013. Computational tools for accelerating carbon capture process development. Presented at 38th Int. Tech. Conf. Clean Coal Fuel Syst., Clearwater, FL
21. Lee A, Miller DC. 2013. A one-dimensional, (1-D) three-region model for a bubbling fluidised bed adsorber. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:469-84
22. Modekurti S, Bhattacharyya D, Zitney SE. 2013. Dynamic modeling and control studies of a two-stage bubbling fluidized bed adsorber-reactor for solid-sorbent CO2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:10250-60
23. Modekurti S, Bhattacharyya D, Zitney SE. 2012. Dynamic modeling and transient studies of a solid-sorbent adsorber for CO2 capture. Presented at 29th Annu. Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf., Pittsburgh, PA
24. Kim H, Miller DC. 2011. Development of a moving bed simulation model for carbon capture from fossil energy systems. Presented at AIChE Annu. Meet., Minneapolis, MN
25. Kunii D, Levenspiel O. 1991. Fluidization Engineering. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
26. L̈ udtke KH. 2004. Process Centrifugal Compressors: Basics, Function, Operation, Design, Application. Berlin: Springer
27. Biegler LT, Grossmann IE,Westerberg AW. 1997. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
28. Siirola JJ. 1996. Industrial applications of chemical process synthesis. In Advances in Chemical Engineering, ed. JL Anderson, pp. 2-62. San Diego, CA: Academic
29. Grossmann IE. 1996. Mixed-integer optimization techniques for algorithmic process synthesis. In Advances in Chemical Engineering, ed. JL Anderson, pp. 172-239. San Diego, CA: Academic
30. Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR, Widagdo S. 2008. Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Design. New York: Wiley. 3rd ed.
31. Black JB, Haslbeck JL, Jones AP, Lundberg WL, Shah V. 2013. Cost and performance of PC and IGCC plants for a range of carbon dioxide capture. Report no. DOE/NETL-2011/1498, US Dep. Energy, Natl. Energy Technol. Lab., Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/ Publications/Gerdes-08022011.pdf
32. Seader JD, Seider WD, Pauls AC, Hughes RR. 1977. FLOWTRAN Simulation: An Introduction. Austin, TX: CACHE
33. Evans LB, Boston JF, Britt HI, Gallier PW, Gupta PK, et al. 1979. Aspen: An advanced system for process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 3:319-27
34. Pantelides CC. 1988. Speedup-recent advances in process simulation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 12:745-55
35. Rios LM, Sahinidis NV. 2013. Derivative-free optimization: A review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations. J. Glob. Optim. 56:1247-93
36. Wang GG, Shan S. 2007. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 129:370-80
37. Cozad A, Sahinidis NV, Miller DC. 2014. Learning surrogate models for simulation-based optimization. AIChE J. 60:2211-27
38. Caballero JA, Grossmann IE. 2008. An algorithm for the use of surrogate models in modular flowsheet optimization. AIChE J. 54:2633-50
39. Henao CA, Maravelias CT. 2011. Surrogate-based superstructure optimization framework. AIChE J. 57:1216-32
40. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. 1993. A corrected Akaike information criterion for vector autoregressive model selection. J. Time Ser. Anal. 14:271-79
41. Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis NV. 2005. A polyhedral branch-And-cut approach to global optimization. Math. Program. 103:225-49
42. Eslick JC, Miller DC. 2011. A multi-objective analysis for the retrofit of a pulverized coal power plant with a CO2 capture and compression process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 35:1488-500
43. Deng G. 2007. Simulation-based optimization. PhD Thesis, Univ. Wis.-Madison
44. Mele FD, Guilĺen G, Espu ̃ na A, Puigjaner L. 2006. A simulation-based optimization framework for parameter optimization of supply-chain networks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45:3133-48
45. Rajasree R, Moharir AS. 2000. Simulation based synthesis, design and optimization of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24:2493-505
46. WanX, Pekny JF,Reklaitis GV. 2005. Simulation-based optimizationwith surrogate models-Application to supply chain management. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29:1317-28
47. Conn AR, Scheinberg K, Vicente LN. 2009. Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. Philadelphia: Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.
48. Hansen N. 2006. The CMA evolution strategy: A comparing review. In Towards a New Evolutionary Computation. Advances on Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing), ed. JA Lozano, P Larra ̃ naga, I Inza, E Bengoetxea, pp. 75-102. Berlin: Springer
49. Huyer W,Neumaier A. 2008. SNOBFIT-stable noisy optimization by branch and fit.ACMTrans.Math. Softw. 35:9:1-9:25
50. Boverhof J, Leek J, Eslick JC, Agarwal D. 2013. Turbine and Sinter: Enabling management of parallel process simulations on demand. CCSI Tech. Rep. Ser. https://www.acceleratecarboncapture.org/drupal/sites/default/files/ elfinder/CCSI-Directory/CCSI-TurbineSinter.pdf
51. US Dep. Energy/Off. Foss. Energy. 2012. Clean Coal Research Program: 2012 Technology Readiness Assessment. Pathway for Readying the Next Generation of Affordable Clean Energy Technology-Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS).Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
52. Lawal A, Wang M, Stephenson P, Koumpouras G, Yeung H. 2010. Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO2 chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants. Fuel 89:2791-801
53. Lin Y, Pan T, Wong DS, Jang S, Chi Y, Yeh C. 2011. Plantwide control of CO2 capture by absorption and stripping using monoethanolamine solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:1338-45
54. Ziaii S, Rochelle GT, Edgar TF. 2009. Dynamic modeling to minimize energy use for CO2 capture in power plants by aqueous monoethanolamine. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48:6105-11
55. Braatz RD, Alkire RC, Seebauer E, Rusli E, Gunawan R, et al. 2006. Perspectives on the design and control of multiscale systems. J. Process Control 16:193-204
56. Nandong J, Samyudia Y, Tade MO. 2007. Control of multi-scale dynamics system. Presented at 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl., Singapore
57. Ilchman A. 1993. Non-Identifier-Based High-Gain Adaptive Control. New York: Springer
58. Ilchman A, Ryan EP. 1994. Universal-tracking for nonlinearly-perturbed systems in the presence of noise. Automatica 30:337-46
59. SentoniGB, Guiver JP, ZhaoH, Biegler LT. 1998. A state space approach to nonlinear process modeling: Identification and universality. AIChE J. 44:2229-39
60. Agrawal K, Loezos PN, Syamlal M, Sundaresan S. 2001. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas-solid flows. J. Fluid Mech. 445:151-85
61. Igci Y, Andrews AT, Sundaresan S, Pannala S, O'Brien T. 2008. Filtered two-fluid models for fluidized gas-particle suspensions. AIChE J. 54:1431-48
62. Parmentier JF, Simonin O, Delsart O. 2012. A functional subgrid drift velocity model for filtered drag prediction in dense fluidized bed. AIChE J. 58:1084-98
63. Wang W, Lu B, Zhang N, Shi Z, Li J. 2010. A review of multiscale CFD for gas-solid CFB modeling. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 36:109-18
64. Igci Y, Sundaresan S. 2011. Constitutive models for filtered two-fluid models of fluidized gas-particle flows. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:13190-201
65. Milioli CC, Milioli FE, Holloway W, Agrawal K, Sundaresan S. 2013. Filtered two-fluid models of fluidized gas-particle flows: New constitutive relations. AIChE J. 59:3265-75
66. Agrawal K,HollowayW,Milioli CC, Milioli FE, Sundaresan S. 2013. Filtered models for scalar transport in gas-particle flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 95:291-300
67. HollowayW, Sundaresan S. 2012. Filtered models for reacting gas-particle flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 82:132-43
68. Sarkar A, Sun X, Sundaresan S. 2013. Sub-grid drag models for horizontal cylinder arrays immersed in gas-particle multiphase flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 104:399-412
69. Igci Y, Pannala S, Benyahia S, Sundaresan S. 2011. Validation studies on filtered model equations for gas-particle flows in risers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51:2094-103
70. Igci Y, Sundaresan S. 2011. Verification of filtered two-fluid models for gas-particle flows in risers. AIChE J. 57:2691-707
71. Ryan EM, Montgomery C, Storlie C, Wendelberger J. 2012. CCSI validation and uncertainty quantification hierarchy forCFDmodels.CCSITech. Rep. Ser. http://www.acceleratecarboncapture.org/drupal/sites/default/files/elfinder/ CCSI-Directory/Deliverables/Sept-30-2012/CCSI-V-UQ%20Hierarchy-FINAL.pdf
72. Spenik J. 2011. Development of a circulating fluidized bed for flue gas carbon capture using solid sorbent. Presented at NETL 2011 Workshop Multiph. Flow Sci., Pittsburgh, PA
73. Lane WA,Storlie C, Montgomery C,Ryan EM. 2013. Numerical modeling and uncertainty quantification of a bubbling fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tubes. Powder Technol. 253:733-43
74. Storlie C, Lane WA, Ryan EM. 2013. Calibration of computational models with categorical parameters and correlated outputs via Bayesian smoothing spline ANOVA. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. Submitted
75. Kim SW, Ahn JY, Kim SD, Lee DH. 2003. Heat transfer and bubble characteristics in a fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundle. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46:399-409
76. Helton JC. 1997. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 57:3-76
77. Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM. 2000. Sensitivity Analysis. New York:Wiley
78. Oakley J, O'Hagan A. 2002. Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs. Biometrika 89:769-84
79. Storlie CB, Swiler LP, Helton JC, Sallaberry CJ. 2009. Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94:1735-63
80. Konomi BA, Karagiannis G, Sarkar A, Sun X, Lin G. 2013. Bayesian treed multivariate Gaussian process with adaptive design: Application to a carbon capture unit. Technometrics. In press. doi:10.1080/00401706.2013.879078
81. Wen CY, Yu YH. 1966. Mechanics of fluidization. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. 62:100-11
82. Engel D, Dalton A, Anderson K, Sivaramakrishnan C, Lansing C. 2012. Development of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Metrics and Risk Measure. Richland, WA: Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product. biblio.jsposti-id=1067968
83. Dale C, Thompson J, Engel D, Dalton A, Jones E. 2013. Risk analysis and decision making. CCSI Tech. Rep. Ser. www.acceleratecarboncapture.org
84. Zongxue X, Jinno K, Kawamura A, Takesaki S, Ito K. 1989. Performance risk analysis for Fukuoka water supply system. Water Resour. Manag. 12:13-30
85. Engel D, Letellier B, Edwards B, LeClaire R, Jones E. 2012. New technical risk management development for carbon capture process. Presented at 11th Annu. Conf. Carbon Capture Sequestration, Pittsburgh, PA