Dynamic modeling and control studies of a two-stage bubbling fluidized bed adsorber-reactor for solid-sorbent CO2 capture

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 52, Issue 30, 2013, Pages 10250-10260

  Modekurti, Srinivasarao ^a,b   Bhattacharyya, Debangsu ^a,b   Zitney, Stephen E ^b  

^a West Virginia University   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUBBLING FLUIDIZED BED; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; CONTINUOUS PHASE; FEED-FORWARD CONTROLLERS; MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLERS; MODELING AND CONTROL; PROCESS VARIABLES; PROPORTIONALINTEGRAL- DERIVATIVE (PID);

ADSORPTION; AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT; BUBBLE FORMATION; COAL; DYNAMIC MODELS; EMULSIFICATION; FLUE GASES; FLUIDIZED BEDS; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84881065505     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie400852k     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 2 Capture Technology-The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2, 9-20
2. Hoffman, J. S.; Richards, G. A.; Pennline, H. W.; Fischer, D.; Keller, G. Factors in Reactor Design for Carbon Dioxide Capture with Solid, Regenerable Sorbents. Proceedings of 33rd International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL, June 1-5, 2008.
3. Gray, M. L.; Hoffman, J. S.; Hreha, D. C.; Fauth, D. J.; Hedges, S. W.; Champagne, K. J.; Pennline, H. W. Parametric Study of Solid Amine Sorbents for the Capture of Carbon Dioxide Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 4840-4844
4. Monazam, E. R.; Shadle, L. J.; Siriwardane, R. Performance and Kinetics of a Solid Amine Sorbent for Carbon Dioxide Removal Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2011, 50, 10989-10995
5. nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, 1991.
6. 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2012, 51, 1438-1463
7. 2 Capture Systems Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2004, 43, 3462-3466
8. 2 Capture Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 1514-1520
9. Roy, S.; Mohanty, C. R.; Meikap, B. C. Multistage Fluidized Bed Reactor Performance Characterization for Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2009, 48, 10718-10727
10. 2 Capture from Flue Gases Using a Dual Fluidized Bed Reactor with Calcium-Based Sorbent Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2009, 48, 11140-11147
11. Li, B.; Jiang, B.; Fauth, D. J.; Gray, M. L.; Pennline, H. W.; Richards, G. A. Innovative Nano-Layered Solid Sorbents for CO2 Capture Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1719-1721
12. 2 Capture from Flue Gases with Supported Amine Sorbent Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2013, 52, 2084-2093
13. 2 Capture for Variable Feed Concentration and Flow Rate. 2. Pressure Swing Adsorption and Vacuum Swing Adsorption Processes Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2012, 51, 15665-15682
14. Kunii, D.; Levenspiel, O. Fluidized Reactor Models.1.For Bubbling Beds of Fine, Intermediate, and Large Particles. 2. For the Lean Phase: Freeboard and Fast Fluidization Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 1990, 29 (7) 1226-1234
15. Kobayashi, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Mori, S. A Study on the Behavior of Bubbles and Solids in Bubbling Fluidized Beds Powder Technol. 2000, 113, 327-344
16. 2 Capture Process with Two-Fluidized Bed Reactors Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1, 31-36
17. 2 Capture by Dry Regenerable Potassium Based Sorbents. 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 2010, pp 1-10.
18. 2 Capture from Flue Gas Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28 (4) 1144-1147
19. 2 from Flue Gases J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 187, 113-121
20. Lee, A.; Miller, D. A 1-D Three Region Model for a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Adsorber Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2013, 52, 469-484
21. 2 Capture Absorption Column Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 12, 247-258
22. 2 Capture Plant: Dynamic Modeling and Simulations Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 14, 282-290
23. 2 Capture: An Optimization Study Using Dynamic Models Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 13, 44-58
24. 2 Capture Processes Using Advanced Control Techniques: Towards Operational Cost Minimisation Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11, 236-250
25. 2 Capture in Power Plant by Aqueous Monoethanolamine Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2009, 48, 6105-6111
26. Ikonen, E.; Kortela, U. Dynamic Model for a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Coal Combustor Control Eng. Practice 1994, 2 (6) 1001-1006
27. Yuan, T.; Cizmas, P. G.; O'Brien, T. A Reduced Order Model for a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Comput. Chem. Eng. 2005, 30, 243-259
28. Mahecha-Botero, A.; Grace, J. R.; Elnashaie, S. S. E. H.; Lim, C. J. Time-Scale Analysis of a Fluidized-Bed Catalytic Reactor Based on a Generalized Dynamic Model. The 12th International Conference on Fluidization-New Horizons in Fluidization Engineering, 2007, Vol. RP.4, pp 623-630.
29. 2 Adsorption on Amine Adsorbents. 1. Impact of Heat Effects Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2012, 51, 15145-15152
30. 2 Adsorption on Amine Adsorbents. 2. Insights into Adsorbent Design Ind. Chem. Eng. Res. 2012, 51, 15153-15162
31. 2 Capture Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 2044-2052
32. 2 Adsorption on Sodium Oxide Promoted Alumina in a Packed-Bed Reactor Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 5938-5944
33. 2 Capture for Coal-Fired Power Plants through Dynamic Modeling and Simulation Fuel 2012, 101, 115-128
34. Harrison, A. J. L; Lim, C.-N.; Gilbertson, M. A. Modelling and Control of the Dynamics of Bubbling Fluidized Beds Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E 2005, 220, 43-53
35. 2 on amine-impregnated mesoporous sorbents in the presence of water, 28th International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2011.
36. th ed.; Prentice Hall: 2012.