Numerical modeling and uncertainty quantification of a bubbling fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tubes

Powder Technology

Volumn 253, Issue , 2014, Pages 733-743

  Lane, William A ^a   Storlie, Curtis B ^b   Montgomery, Christopher J ^c   Ryan, Emily M ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c URS CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian calibration; Carbon capture; Fluidized beds; Hydrodynamics; Tube bundle; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN CALIBRATION; BUBBLING FLUIDIZED BED; CALIBRATION PROCEDURE; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; SOLID-SOLID INTERACTIONS; TUBE BUNDLE; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

BUBBLE FORMATION; CALIBRATION; CARBON CAPTURE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRAG; FRICTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; PACKED BEDS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRIBOLOGY; TUBES (COMPONENTS); UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FLUIDIZED BEDS;

CARBON;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BUBBLING FLUIDIZED BED; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUIDIZED BED; FRICTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMMERSED HORIZONTAL TUBE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TUBE; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84892635071     PISSN: 00325910     EISSN: 1873328X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.037     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Asegehegn T.W., Schreiber M., Krautz H.J. Investigation of bubble behavior in fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes using a digital image analysis technique. Powder Technol. 2011, 210(3):248-260.
2. Kim S.W., Ahn J.Y., Kim S.D., Hyun Lee D. Heat transfer and bubble characteristics in a fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundle. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2003, 46(3):399-409.
3. Helton J. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 1997, 57:3-76.
4. Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis 2000, Wiley, New York, NY.
5. Oakley J., O'Hagan A. Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs. Biometrika 2002, 769-784.
6. Higdon D., Kennedy M., Cavendish J. Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2004, 26:448-466.
7. Higdon D., Lee H., Holloman C. Markov chain Monte Carlo-based approaches for inference in computationally intensive inverse problems. Bayesian Statistics 7, Proceedings of the Seventh Valencia International Meeting 2003.
8. Gel A., Garg R., Tong C., Shahnam M., Guenther C. Applying uncertainty quantification to multiphase flow computational fluid dynamics. Powder Technol. 2013, 242:27-39.
9. Storlie C.B., Bondell H.D., Reich B.J., Zhang H.H. Surface estimation, variable selection, and the nonparametric oracle property. Stat. Sin. 2011, 21(2):679-705.
10. Ryan E.M., Montgomery C.J., Storlie C.B., Wendelberger J. CCSI validation and uncertainty and quantification hierarchy for CFD models. Tech. rep. 2013.
11. Benyahia S., Syamlal M., O'Brien T.J. Summary of MFIX Equations From URL. https://mfix.netl.doe.gov/documentation/MFIXEquations2012-1.pdf.
12. Li T., Dietiker J.-F., Zhang Y., Shahnam M. Cartesian grid simulations of bubbling fluidized beds with a horizontal tube bundle. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:6220-6231.
13. Li T., Grace J., Bi X. Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized beds. Powder Technol. 2010, 203(3):447-457.
14. Jung J., Gamwo I.K. Multiphase CFD-based models for chemical looping combustion process: fuel reactor modeling. Powder Technol. 2008, 183:401-409.
15. da Silva F.R.G.B., de Souza M., da Costa A.M.D.S., Jorge L.M.D.M., Paraíso P.R. Experimental and numerical analysis of soybean meal drying in fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 2012, 229:61-70.
16. Reuge N., Cadoret L., Caussat B. Multifluid Eulerian modelling of a silicon fluidized bed chemical vapor deposition process: analysis of various kinetic models. Chem. Eng. J. (Amst., Neth.) 2009, 148:506-516.
17. McKeen T., Pugsley T. Simulation and experimental validation of a freely bubbling bed of FCC catalyst. Powder Technol. 2003, 129:139-152.
18. Li F., Song F., Benyahia S., Wang W., Li J. MP-PIC simulation of CFB riser with EMMS-based drag model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 82:104-113.
19. Li T., Garg R., Galvin J., Pannala S. Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: part II validation studies. Powder Technol. 2012, 220:138-150.
20. Ryan E.M., Sun X., Sundaresan S., Dartevelle S., DeCroix David, Huckaby E.D., Saha K., Xu W. Computational modeling of the 1kW ADA-ES solid sorbent carbon capture system particle and device scale models. Tech. Rep. 0004000 2011, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
21. Syamlal M., Rogers W., O'Brien T.J. MFIX Theory Guide. Tech. rep. 1993.
22. Syamlal M. A Review of Granular Stress Constitutive Relations. Tech. rep. 1987, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, (DOE/MC/21353-2372, NTIS/DE87006499).
23. Wen C., Yu Y. Mechanics of fluidization. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. 1966, 62:100-111.
24. Esmaili E., Mahinpey N. Adjustment of drag coefficient correlations in three dimensional CFD simulation of gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2011, 42:375-386.
25. Syamlal M., O'Brien T.J. The Derivation of a Drag Coefficient Formula from Velocity-Voidage Correlations. Tech. rep. 1987.
26. Ergun S., Orning A.A. Fluid flow through randomly packed columns and fluidized beds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1949, 41(6):1179-1184.
27. Hull A., Chen Z., Fritz J. Influence of horizontal tube banks on the behavior of bubbling fluidized beds: 1. Bubble hydrodynamics. Powder Technol. 1999, 103(3):230-242.
28. Hull A., Chen Z. Influence of horizontal tube banks on the behavior of bubbling fluidized beds: 2. Mixing of solids. Powder Technol. 2000, 111(3):192-199.
29. Olsson S., Wiman J., Almstedt A. Hydrodynamics of a pressurized fluidized bed with horizontal tubes: influence of pressure, fluidization velocity and tube-bank geometry. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50(4):581-592.
30. Lane W.A., Storlie C.B., Montgomery C.J., Ryan E.M. Modeling and validation of a large scale, multiphase carbon capture system. ASME 2013 Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting 2013.
31. Chao Z., Wang Y., Jakobsen J.P., Fernandino M., Jakobsen H.A. Derivation and validation of a binary multi-fluid Eulerian model for fluidized beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66(16):3605-3616.
32. Herzog N., Schreiber M., Egbers C., Krautz H.J. A comparative study of different CFD-codes for numerical simulation of gas-solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 39:41-46.
33. Asegehegn T.W., Schreiber M., Krautz H.J. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of bubble behavior in 2D gas-solid fluidized beds with immersed horizontal tubes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66(21):5410-5427.
34. Hulme I., Clavelle E., van der Lee L., Kantzas A. CFD modeling and validation of bubble properties for a bubbling fluidized bed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44(12):4254-4266.
35. Lindborg H., Lysberg M., Jakobsen H.A. Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62(21):5854-5869.
36. Zhao Y., Tang L., Luo Z., Liang C., Xing H., Wu W., Duan C. Experimental and numerical simulation studies of the fluidization characteristics of a separating gas-solid fluidized bed. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91(12):1819-1825.
37. Asegehegn T.W., Schreiber M., Krautz H.J. Influence of two- and three-dimensional simulations on bubble behavior in gas-solid fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes. Powder Technol. 2012, 219:9-19.
38. Dan S., Jianzhi W., Huilin L., Yunhua Z., Juhui C., Gidaspow D., Ming C. Numerical simulation of gas-particle flow with a second-order moment method in bubbling fluidized beds. Powder Technol. 2010, 199(3):213-225.
39. Rong D., Mikami T. Particle and bubble movements around tubes immersed in fluidized beds-a numerical study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54:5737-5754.
40. Yusuf R., Halvorsen B., Melaaen M.C. An experimental and computational study of wall to bed heat transfer in a bubbling gas-solid fluidized bed. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2012, 42:9-23.
41. Helton J., Davis F. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2003, 81(1):23-69.
42. Kennedy M.C., O'Hagan A. Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat Methodol. 2001, 63:425-464.
43. C.B. Storlie, W.A. Lane, E.M. Ryan, Calibration of Computational Models with Categorical Parameters and Correlated Outputs via Bayesian Smoothing Spline ANOVA, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. [under review].
44. Reich B.B.J., Storlie C.B., Bondell H.D. Variable selection in Bayesian smoothing spline ANOVA models: application to deterministic computer codes. Technometrics 2009, 51:110-120.
45. Givens G.H., Hoeting J.A. Computational Statistics 2013, John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2nd edition.
46. Storlie C.B., Swiler L.P., Helton J.C., Sallaberry C.J. Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94(11):1753-1763.
47. Storlie C.B., Helton J.C. Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: example results. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2007, 93(1):28-54.
48. Spenik J. Development of a circulating fluidized bed for flue gas carbon capture using solid sorbent. NETL Workshop on Multiphase Flow Science, Pittsburgh, PA 2011.