In vitro osteogenic cell proliferation, mineralization, and in vivo osseointegration of injection molded high-density polyethylene-based hybrid composites in rabbit animal model

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 142-157

  Tripathi, Garima ^a   Basu, Bikramjit ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

cell adhesion; histopathology; in vivo implantation; Surface property

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; INJECTION MOLDING; MINERALOGY; SINTERING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYBRID COMPOSITES; IN-VIVO;

HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENES;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYETHYLENE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DEFECT; BONE IMPLANT; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HEALING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; NEW ZEALAND WHITE (RABBIT); NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; IMPLANT; LEPORIDAE; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DURAPATITE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; POLYETHYLENE; RABBITS;

EID: 84902379663     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328214520805     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mackie IG, Green M, Clarke H, et al. Osteoporotic bone microstructure by collagenase etching. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 ; 48: 464-469
2. Dunn MG, Avasarala PN, Zawadsky JP. Optimization of extruded collagen fibers for ACL reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 ; 27: 1545-1552
3. Kao JK, Ramesh DV, Rao KP. Implantable controlled delivery systems for proteins based on collagen - pHEMA hydrogels. Biomaterials. 1994 ; 15: 383-389
4. Petite H, Frei V, Huc A, et al. Use of diphenylphosphorylazide for cross-linking collagen-based biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994 ; 128: 159-165
5. Bonfield W, Grynpas MD, Tully AE, et al. Hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene - a mechanically compatible implant material for bone replacement. Biomaterials. 1981 ; 2: 185-186
6. Katz JL Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ Lemons JE, ed. Boston: Academic Press ; 1996: 335-335.
7. Laurencin CT, Ambrosio MA, Borden M, et al. Tissue engineering: orthopedic applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999 ; 1: 19-46
8. Cooper SL, Visser SA, Hergenrother RW, et al Biomaterials science. Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ Lemons JE, ed. San Diego, London: Elsevier Academic Press ; 2004: 67-67.
9. Luklinska ZB, Bonfield W. Morphology and ultrastructure of the interface between hydroxyapatite/polyhydroxybutyrate implant and bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1997 ; 8: 379-383
10. Sarsilmaz F, Orhan N, Unsaldi E, et al. A polyethylene-high proportion hydroxyapatite implant and its investigation in vivo. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2007 ; 9: 9-16
11. Bonfield W, Behiri JC, Doyle C, et al Biomaterials and Biomechanics. Ducheyne P Van der Perre G Aubert AE, ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science ; 1984: 421-421.
12. Bonfield W, Luklinska ZB The bone-biomaterial interface. Davies JE, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press ; 1991: 89-89.
13. Tripathi G, Dubey A, Basu B. Evaluation of physico-mechanical properties and in vitro biocompatibility of compression molded HDPE based biocomposites with HA/Al2O3 ceramic fillers and titanate coupling agents. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011 ; 124: 3051-3063
14. Tripathi G, Basu B. Injection-molded high-density polyethylene- hydroxyapatite-aluminum oxide hybrid composites for hard-tissue replacement: mechanical, biological, and protein adsorption behavior. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011 ; 124: 2133-2143
15. Tripathi G, Gough J, Dinda A, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo osseointegration property of compression moulded HDPE-HA-Al2O3 hybrid biocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012 ; 101A: 1539-1543
16. Owens DK, Wendtn RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969 ; 13: 1741-1747
17. Gupta A, Tripathi G, Basu B, et al. Dependence of protein adsorption on wetting behavior of UHMWPE-HA-Al2O3-CNT hybrid biocomposites. JOM. 2012 ; 64: 506-513
18. Gregory CA, Gunn WG, Peister A, et al. An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem. 2004 ; 329: 77-84
19. Wolff JU. Ber die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen der Form und der Function der Einzelnen Gebilde des Organismus, 1901 (FCW Vogel, Leipzig, Germany).
20. Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review. Osteoporosis Int. 2002 ; 13: 688-700
21. Chen JH, Liu C, You L, et al. Boning up on Wolff's law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech. 2010 ; 43: 108-118
22. You L, Temiyasathit S, Lee P, et al. Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading. Bone. 2008 ; 42: 172-179
23. Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML. Candidates for the, mechanosensory system in bone. J Biomech Eng. 1991 ; 113: 191-197
24. Lanyon LE. Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 ; 53: S102 - S107
25. Klein-Nulend J, van der Plas A, Semeins CM, et al. Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro. FASEB J. 1995 ; 9: 441-445
26. Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J. Mechanotransduction in bone-role of the lacuno-canalicular network. FASEB J. 1999 ; 13: S101 - S112
27. Heath JP, Holifield BF. Cell locomotion: new research tests old ideas on membrane and cytoskeletal flow. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1991 ; 18: 245-257
28. Schrader ME. On adhesion of biological substances to low energy solid-surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1982 ; 88: 296-297
29. Francois P, Vaudaux P, Taborelli M, et al. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (II) Adsorption isotherms and biological activity of immobilized fibronectin. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 ; 8: 217-225
30. Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, et al. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials. 2001 ; 22: 1241-1251
31. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 ; 11: 530-539
32. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, et al. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 ; 7: 302-310
33. Keller JC, Schneider GB, Stanford CM, et al. Effects of implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment. Implant Dent. 2003 ; 12: 175-181
34. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, et al. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials. 2001 ; 22: 87-96
35. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, et al. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop. 2006 ; 77: 177-197
36. Shors EC and Holmes RE. An introduction to bioceramics, advanced series in ceramics. In: Hench L and Wilson J (eds) Singapore: World Scientific, 1993, p.181.
37. Ducheyne P, Bianco P, Radin S, et al Bone-bonding biomaterials. Ducheyne P Kokubo T van Blitterswijk CA, ed. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press ; 1993: 1-1.