Agreement of Medicaid claims and electronic health records for assessing preventive care quality among adults

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 720-724

  Heintzman, John ^a   Bailey, Steffani R ^a   Hoopes, Megan J ^b   Le, Thuy ^b   Gold, Rachel ^b,c   O'Malley, Jean P ^d   Cowburn, Stuart ^b   Marino, Miguel ^a,d   Krist, Alex ^e   DeVoe, Jennifer E ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OCHIN Inc   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; LIPID ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

CLAIMS DATA; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; MEDICAL CARE DELIVERY; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; QUALITY OF CARE;

ADULT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; MEDICAID; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84902374082     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002333     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs: hospital outpatient prospective payment and ambulatory surgical center payment systems and quality reporting programs; electronic reporting pilot; inpatient rehabilitation facilities quality reporting program; revision to quality improvement organization regulations. Final rule with comment period. Federal Register 2012;77:68:209-565.
2. Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, et al. Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2013;368:779-80.
3. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Initial Core Set of Health Care Quality Measures for Adults Enrolled in Medicaid (Medicaid Adult Core Set) Technical Specifications and Resource Manual for Federal Fiscal Year 2013. 2013.
4. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. 2011-2012 Eligible Professional Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs). [cited 2013 March 8]. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/CQM_Through_2013. htm.
5. Harrington R, Coffin J, Chauhan B. Understanding how the Physician Quality Reporting System affects primary care physicians. J Med Pract Manage 2013;28:248-50.
6. Tang PC, Ralston M, Arrigotti MF, et al. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:10-15.
7. Smalley W. Administrative data and measurement of colonoscopy quality: not ready for prime time? Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:454-5.
8. Bronstein JM, Santer L, Johnson V. The use of Medicaid claims as a supplementary source of information on quality of asthma care. J Healthc Qual 2000;22:13-18.
9. Kottke TE, Baechler CJ, Parker ED. Accuracy of heart disease prevalence estimated from claims data compared with an electronic health record. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E141.
10. Segal JB, Powe NR. Accuracy of identification of patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura through administrative records: a data validation study. Am J Hematol 2004;75:12-17.
11. Solberg LI, Engebretson KI, Sperl-Hillen JM, et al. Are claims data accurate enough to identify patients for performance measures or quality improvement? The case of diabetes, heart disease, and depression. Am J Med Qual 2006;21:238-45.
12. Fowles JB, Fowler EJ, Craft C. Validation of claims diagnoses and self-reported conditions compared with medical records for selected chronic diseases. J Ambul Care Manage 1998;21:24-34.
13. Devoe JE, Gold R, McIntire P, et al. Electronic health records vs Medicaid claims: completeness of diabetes preventive care data in community health centers. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:351-8.
14. MacLean CH, Louie R, Shekelle PG, et al. Comparison of administrative data and medical records to measure the quality of medical care provided to vulnerable older patients. Med Care 2006;44:141-8.
15. Weiner JP, Fowles JB, Chan KS. New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24:200-5.
16. Kern LM, Kaushal R. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:1113.
17. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:503-27.
18. De Leon SF, Shih SC. Tracking the delivery of prevention-oriented care among primary care providers who have adopted electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18(Suppl 1):i91-5.
19. Persell SD, Dunne AP, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Electronic health record-based cardiac risk assessment and identification of unmet preventive needs. Med Care 2009;47:418-24.
20. Weiner M, Stump TE, Callahan CM, et al. Pursuing integration of performance measures into electronic medical records: beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist medications. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:99-106.
21. Dean BB, Lam J, Natoli JL, et al. Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review. Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:611-38.
22. Baker DW, Persell SD, Thompson JA, et al. Automated review of electronic health records to assess quality of care for outpatients with heart failure. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:270-7.
23. Greiver M, Barnsley J, Glazier RH, et al. Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:116.
24. Kerr EA, Smith DM, Hogan MM, et al. Comparing clinical automated, medical record, and hybrid data sources for diabetes quality measures. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28:555-65.
25. Parsons A, McCullough C, Wang J, et al. Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:604-9.
26. Kmetik KS, O'Toole MF, Bossley H, et al. Exceptions to outpatient quality measures for coronary artery disease in electronic health records. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:227-34.
27. Persell SD, Wright JM, Thompson JA, et al. Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2272-7.
28. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barron Y, et al. Accuracy of electronically reported 'meaningful use' clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2013;158: 77-83.
29. OCHIN. OCHIN 2012 Annual Report 2013. https://ochin.org/depository/OCHIN% 202012%20Annual%20Report.pdf.
30. Calman NS, Hauser D, Chokshi DA. 'Lost to follow-up': the public health goals of accountable care. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:584-6.
31. United States Preventive Service Task Force. USPSTF A and B Recommendations by Date. [cited 2013 8/26/13]. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsrecsdate.htm.
32. Centers for Disease Control. Summary* Recommendations: Prevention and Control of Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-(ACIP)-United States, 2013-14. 2013 [cited 2013 August 26]. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/acip/2013-summaryrecommendations. htm.
33. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360-3.
34. Skentzos S, Shubina M, Plutzky J, et al. Structured vs. unstructured: factors affecting adverse drug reaction documentation in an EMR repository. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011:1270-9.
35. Toyabe S. Detecting inpatient falls by using natural language processing of electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:448.
36. Lazarus R, Klompas M, Campion FX, et al. Electronic Support for Public Health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:18-24.
37. Hazlehurst B, McBurnie MA, Mularski R, et al. Automating quality measurement: a system for scalable, comprehensive, and routine care quality Assessment. Am Med Inform Assoc Annu Symp Proc Arch 2009;2009:229-33.
38. Clark C, Good K, Jezierny L, et al. Identifying smokers with a medical extraction system. J Am Inform Assoc 2008;15:36-9.
39. Denny JC, Peterson JF, Choma NN, et al. Extracting timing and status descriptors for colonoscopy testing from electronic medical records. J Am Inform Assoc 2010;17:383-8.
40. Wagholikar KB, MacLaughlin KL, Henry MR, et al. Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening. J Am Inform Assoc 2012;19:833-9.
41. Hazelhurst B, Sittig DF, Stevens VJ, et al. Natural language processing in the electronic medical record: assessing clinician adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines. Am J Prev Med 2005;29:434-9.
42. Harkema H, Chapman WW, Saul M, et al. Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures. J Am Inform Assoc 2011;18(Suppl 1):1150-6.
43. Baldwin KB. Evaluating healthcare quality using natural language processing. J Healthc Qual 2008;30:24-9.
44. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The 'meaningful use' regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
45. Angier H, Gallia C, Tillotson C, Gold R, et al. Pediatric health care quality measures in state Medicaid administrative claims plus electronic health records. North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting; November 9-13, 2013; Ottawa, Canada 2013.