Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 833-839

  Wagholikar, Kavishwar B ^a   MacLaughlin, Kathy L ^a   Henry, Michael R ^a   Greenes, Robert A ^b,c   Hankey, Ronald A ^a   Liu, Hongfang ^a   Chaudhry, Rajeev ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TEXT MESSAGING; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; WART VIRUS; DATA MINING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

AGED; DATA MINING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 84871984012     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000820     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Yabroff KR, Saraiya M, Meissner HI, et al. Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:602-11.
2. Saraiya M, Berkowitz Z, Yabroff KR, et al. Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and papanicolaou testing vs papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending?. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:977-85.
3. Lee JW, Berkowitz Z, Saraiya M. Low-risk human papillomavirus testing and other non recommended human papillomavirus testing practices among U.S. health care providers. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:4-13.
4. Roland KB, Soman A, Benard VB, et al. Human papillomavirus and papanicolaou tests screening interval recommendations in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:447.e1-8.
5. Hoeksema LJ, Bazzy-Asaad A, Lomotan EA, et al. Accuracy of a computerized clinical decision-support system for asthma assessment and management. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:243-50.
6. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:387-92.
7. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90.
8. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health 1995;85:791-4.
9. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:675-83.
10. Nelson W, Moser RP, Gaffey A, et al. Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:1759-68.
11. Wheeler CM. Natural history of human papillomavirus infections, cytologic and histologic abnormalities, and cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008;35:519-36; vii.
12. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-62.
13. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs 2003;103:101-2; 105-6; 108-9.
14. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins e Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin no. 109: cervical cytology screening. Obstetrics Gynecol 2009;114:1409-20.
15. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer. 2003. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscerv.htm (accessed 15 Sep 2011).
16. Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:346-55.
17. Dupuis EA, White HF, Newman D, et al. Tracking abnormal cervical cancer screening: evaluation of an EMR-based intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:575-80.
18. Greenes RA, ed. Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead, 1st edn. New York: Academic Press, 2006.
19. Elkin PL, Liebow M, Bauer BA, et al. The introduction of a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain) into the workflow of a teaching hospital service can decrease the cost of service for diagnostically challenging Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). Int J Med Inform 2010;79:772-7.
20. Aronsky D, Fiszman M, Chapman WW, et al. Combining decision support methodologies to diagnose pneumonia. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:12-16.
21. Chaudhry R, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Parks DA, et al. Use of a web-based clinical decision support system to improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in a primary care practice. J Eval Clin Pract. Published Online First: 15 March 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01661.x
22. Campion TR Jr, Waitman LR, May AK, et al. Social, organizational, and contextual characteristics of clinical decision support systems for intensive insulin therapy: a literature review and case study. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:31-43.
23. Griffey RT, Lo HG, Burdick E, et al. Guided medication dosing for elderly emergency patients using real-time, computerized decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:86-93.
24. Lau F, Kuziemsky C, Price M, et al. A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:637-45.
25. Wagholikar KB, Sundararajan V, Deshpande AW. Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions. J Med Syst. Published Online First: 1 October 2011. doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9780-4
26. Meystre SM, Savova GK, Kipper-Schuler KC, et al. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearbook Med Inform 2008;47:128-44.
27. Friedman C. A broad-coverage natural language processing system. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:270-4.
28. Aronson AR. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:17-21.
29. Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, et al. Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:507-13.
30. Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW. Natural language processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:544-51.
31. Denny JC, Choma NN, Peterson JF, et al. Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record. Med Decis Making 2012;32:188-97.
32. Himes BE, Kohane IS, Ramoni MF, et al. Characterization of patients who suffer asthma exacerbations using data extracted from electronic medical records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:308-12.
33. Effler P, Ching-Lee M, Bogard A, et al. Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods. JAMA 1999;282:1845-50.
34. Lazarus R, Klompas M, Campion FX, et al. Electronic support for public health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:18-24.
35. Gerbier S, Yarovaya O, Gicquel Q, et al. Evaluation of natural language processing from emergency department computerized medical records for intra-hospital syndromic surveillance. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:50.
36. Liao KP, Cai T, Gainer V, et al. Electronic medical records for discovery research in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1120-7.
37. Mishra NK, Cummo DM, Arnzen JJ, et al. A rule-based approach for identifying obesity and its comorbidities in medical discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:576-9.
38. Boytcheva S, Tcharaktchiev D, Angelova G. Contextualization in automatic extraction of drugs from hospital patient records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:527-31.
39. Li Z, Liu F, Antieau L, et al. Lancet: a high precision medication event extraction system for clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:563-7.
40. Melton GB, Hripcsak G. Automated detection of adverse events using natural language processing of discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:448-57.
41. Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, et al. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:115-28.
42. Murff HJ, FitzHenry F, Matheny ME, et al. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. JAMA 2011;306:848-55.
43. Demner-Fushman D, Chapman WW, McDonald CJ. What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? J Biomed Inform 2009;42:760-72.
44. Jha AK. The promise of electronic records: around the corner or down the road?. JAMA 2011;306:880-1.
45. JBoss Community. Drools. 2012. http://www.jboss.org/drools/ (accessed 15 Sep 2011).
46. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-19.
47. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Price RA, et al. Factors in quality care e the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening testseproblems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:58-71.