Neurophysiological correlates of response inhibition predict relapse in detoxified alcoholic patients: Some preliminary evidence from event-related potentials

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Volumn 10, Issue , 2014, Pages 1025-1037

  Petit, Géraldine ^a   Cimochowska, Agnieszka ^a   Kornreich, Charles ^a   Hanak, Catherine ^a   Verbanck, Paul ^a   Campanella, Salvatore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Alcoholism; ERPs; go no go task; P3d; Relapse; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GO NO GO TASK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; RELAPSE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84902304287     PISSN: 11766328     EISSN: 11782021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S61475     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S, et al. No health without mental health. Lancet. 2007;370:859-877.
2. Finney JW, Hahn AC, Moos RH. The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: the need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction. 1996;91:1773-1796.
3. Pelc I, Verbanck P, Le Bon O, et al. Efficacy and safety of acamprosate in the treatment of detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. A 90-day placebo-controlled dose-finding study. Br J Psychiatry. 1997;171: 73-77.
4. Garland EL, Franken IH, Howard MO. Cue-elicited heart rate variability and attentional bias predict alcohol relapse following treatment. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;222:17-26.
5. Eagle DM, Bari A, Robbins TW. The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;199:439-456.
6. Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008;39: 209-218.
7. Oscar-Berman M, Marinković K. Alcohol: effects on neurobehavioral functions and the brain. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007;17:239-257.
8. Zhang W, Lu J. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol. 2012;89:444-449.
9. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:704-714.
10. Kopp B, Mattler U, Goertz R, Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a NoGo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;99:19-27.
11. Yang B, Yang S, Zhao L, Yin L, Liu X, An S. Event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task of abnormal response inhibition in heroin addicts. Sci China C Life Sci. 2009;52:780-788.
12. Ridderinkhof KR, de Vlugt Y, Bramlage A, et al. Alcohol consumption impairs detection of performance errors in mediofrontal cortex. Science. 2002;298:2209-2211.
13. Kamarajan C, Porjesz B, Jones KA, et al. Alcoholism is a disinhibitory disorder: neurophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol. 2005;69:353-373.
14. Petit G, Kornreich C, Noël X, Verbanck P, Campanella S. Alcohol-related context modulates performance of social drinkers in a visual Go/NoGo task: a preliminary assessment of event-related potentials. PloS One. 2012;7:e37466.
15. Kamarajan C, Porjesz B, Jones KA, et al. Spatial-anatomical mapping of NoGo-P3 in the offspring of alcoholics: evidence of cognitive and neural disinhibition as a risk for alcoholism. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:1049-1061.
16. López-Caneda E, Cadaveira F, Crego A, et al. Hyperactivation of right inferior frontal cortex in young binge drinkers during response inhibition: a follow-up study. Addiction. 2012;107:1796-1808.
17. Wetherill RR, Squeglia LM, Yang TT, Tapert SF. A longitudinal examination of adolescent response inhibition: neural differences before and after the initiation of heavy drinking. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013;230:663-671.
18. Bell RP, Foxe JJ, Ross LA, Garavan H. Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (I): A functional neuroimaging study in former cocaine addicts. Neuropharmacology. Epub 2 013 Mar 6.
19. Morie KP, Garavan H, Bell RP, De Sanctis P, Krakowski MI, Foxe JJ. Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (II): A high-density electrical mapping study in former cocaine and heroin addicts. Neuropharmacology. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
20. Noël X, Van der Linden M, Schmidt N, et al. Supervisory attentional system in nonamnesic alcoholic men. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1152-1158.
21. Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;97:1-20.
22. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction. 2001;96:103-114.
23. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003; 54:25-53.
24. Cox WM, Hogan LM, Kristian MR, Race JH. Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers' treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;68:237-243.
25. Townshend JM, Duka T. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol-dependent inpatients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1349-1357.
26. Fryer SL, Jorgensen KW, Yetter EJ, et al. Differential brain response to alcohol cue distractors across stages of alcohol dependence. Biol Psychol. 2013;92:282-291.
27. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1642-1652.
28. Noël X, Bechara A, Brevers D, Verbanck P, Campanella S. Alcoholism and the loss of willpower: a neurocognitive perspective. J Psychophysiol. 2010;24:240-248.
29. Weafer J, Fillmore MT. Comparison of alcohol impairment of behavioral and attentional inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126:176-182.
30. Zack M, Woodford TM, Tremblay AM, Steinberg L, Zawertailo LA, Busto UE. Stress and alcohol cues exert conjoint effects on go and stop signal responding in male problem drinkers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:445-458.
31. Muraven M, Shmueli D. The self-control costs of fighting the temptation to drink. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:154-160.
32. Nikolaou K, Field M, Duka T. Alcohol-related cues reduce cognitive control in social drinkers. Behav Pharmacol. 2013;24:29-36.
33. Noël X, Van der Linden M, d'Acremont M, et al. Alcohol cues increase cognitive impulsivity in individuals with alcoholism. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;192:291-298.
34. Mainz V, Drüke B, Boeker M, Kessel R, Gauggel S, Forkmann T. Influence of cue exposure on inhibitory control and brain activation in patients with alcohol dependence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6: 1-13.
35. Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;116:132-136.
36. Rugg MD, Coles MGH. The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues. In: Rugg MD, Coles MGH, editors. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Potentials and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995:27-39.
37. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Figure 7.3: Illicit drug or alcohol dependence or abuse, by age group and substance: 2002-2004. 2005. Available from: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k4NSDUH/2k4results/2k4results.htm#fig7.3. Accessed May 5, 2014.
38. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington: APA; 1994.
39. van den Wildenberg E, Wiers RW, Dessers J, et al. A functional polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) influences cue-induced craving for alcohol in male heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1-10.
40. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption - II. Addiction. 1993;88:791-804.
41. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;11: 210-217.
42. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lusthene RE. Manual for the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologist; 1983.
43. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manuel de l'Inventaire de Depression de Beck. 2nd ed. Toronto: Psychological Corporation; 1998.
44. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490-497.
45. Spruyt A, De Houwer J, Tibboel H, et al. On the predictive validity of automatically activated approach/avoidance tendencies in abstaining alcohol-dependent patients. Drug Alc Depend. 2013;127:81-86.
46. Bertrand O, Perrin F, Pernier J. A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;62:462-464.
47. Semlitsch HV, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 1986;23:695-703.
48. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;60:423-434.
49. Falkenstein M, Koshlykova NA, Kiroj VN, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:36-43.
50. Kiefer M, Marzinzik F, Weisbrod M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. Neuroreport. 1998;9:765-770.
51. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/NoGo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999;101: 267-291.
52. Acheson A, Richard DM, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM. Adults with a family history of alcohol related problems are more impulsive on measures of response initiation and response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;117:198-203.
53. Kareken DA, Bragulat V, Dzemidzic M, Cox C, Talavage T, Davidson D. Family history of alcoholism mediates the frontal response to alcoholic drink odors and alcohol in at-risk drinkers. Neuroimage. 2010;50: 267-276.
54. Hatem SM, Plaghki L, Mouraux A. How response inhibition modulates nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory brain-evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:1503-1516.
55. Mainz V, Drüke B, Boecker M, Kessel R, Gauggel S, Forkmann T. Influence of cue exposure on inhibitory control and brain activation in patients with alcohol dependence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:92.
56. Luijten M, Littel M, Franken IHA. Deficits in inhibitory control in smokers during a Go/Nogo task: an investigation using event-related brain potentials. PLoS One. 2011;6:1-7.
57. Flaudias V, Brousse G, de Chazeron I, Planche F, Brun J, Llorca PM. Treatment in hospital for alcohol-dependent patients decreases attentional bias. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:773-779.
58. Noël X, Colmant M, Van Der Linden M, et al. Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: the role of initial orienting. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:1871-1877.
59. Stormark KM, Field NP, Hugdahl K, Horowitz M. Selective processing of visual alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholics: an approach-avoidance conflict? Addict Behav. 1997;22:509-519.
60. Vollstädt-Klein S, Loeber S, von der Goltz C, Mann K, Kiefer F. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli increases during the early stage of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:458-463.
61. Field M, Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;183:350-357.
62. Rose AK, Duka T. Effects of alcohol on inhibitory processes. Behav Pharmacol. 2008;19:284-291.
63. Kreusch F, Vilenne A, Quertemont E. Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers. Addict Behav. 2013;38:2520-2528.
64. Muraven M, Shmueli D. The self-control costs of fighting the temptation to drink. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:154-160.
65. Albert J, López-Martín S, Carretié L. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: neural and behavioral data. Neuroimage. 2010;49:914-921.
66. Dong G, Zhou H, Zhao X. Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neurosci Lett. 2010;485:138-142.
67. Doran N, Spring B, McChargue D, Pergadia M, Richmond M. Impulsivity and smoking relapse. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:641-647.
68. Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig AM, Pergadia M, Richmond M. Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88:79-82.
69. Yoon JH, Higgins ST, Heil SH, Sugarbaker RJ, Thomas CS, Badger GJ. Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;15:176-186.
70. MacKillop J, Kahler CW. Delayed reward discounting predicts treatment response for heavy drinkers receiving smoking cessation treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;104:197-203.
71. Powell J, Dawkins L, West R, Powell J, Pickering A. Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: clinical, cognitive and motivational predictors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;212:537-549.
72. Billieux J, Gay P, Rochat L, Khazaal Y, Zullino D, Van der Linden M. Lack of inhibitory control predicts cigarette smoking dependence: evidence from a non-deprived sample of light to moderate smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;112:164-167.
73. Wegmann L, Buhler AO, Strunk M, Lang P, Nowak D. Smoking cessation with teenagers: the relationship between impulsivity, emotional problems, program retention and effectiveness. Addict Behav. 2012;37:463-468.
74. Bowden-Jones H, McPhillips M, Rogers R, Hutton S, Joyce E. Risk-taking on tests sensitive to ventromedial prefrontal cortex dysfunction predicts early relapse in alcohol dependency: a pilot study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;17:417-420.
75. Evren C, Durkaya M, Evren B, Dalbudak E, Cetin R. Relationship of relapse with impulsivity, novelty seeking and craving in male alcohol-dependent inpatients. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31:81-90.
76. Littel M, van den Berg I, Luijten M, van Rooij AJ, Keemink L, Franken IH. Error processing and response inhibition in excessive computer game players: an event-related potential study. Addict Biol. 2012;17: 934-947.
77. Franken IH, van Strien JW, Franzek EJ, van de Wetering BJ. Error-processing deficits in patients with cocaine dependence. Biol Psychol. 2007;5:45-51.
78. Sokhadze E, Stewart C, Hollifield M, Tasman A. Event-related potential study of executive dysfunctions in a speeded reaction task in cocaine addiction. J Neurother. 2008;12:185-204.
79. Luijten M, Van Meel CS, Franken IH. Diminished error processing in smokers during smoking cue exposure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011;97:514-520.
80. Wilkinson D, Halligan P. The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5: 67-73.