Buyer countervailing power: A survey of the theory and experimental evidence

Experiments and Competition Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 160-182

  Ruffle, Bradley J ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902292115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576201.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Adelman, M. A. (1959), A&P: A Study in Price-Cost Behavior and Public Policy, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown-Kruse, J. (1991), Contestability in the Presence of an Alternate Market: An Experimental Investigation, RAND Journal of Economics 22, 136-147.
3. Cason, T. N. and A. W. Williams (1990), Competitive Equilibrium Convergence in a Posted-Offer Market with Extreme Earnings Inequalities, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 14, 331-352.
4. Chae, S. and P. Heidhues (2004), Buyers’ Alliances for Bargaining Power, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13, 731-754.
5. Chen, Z. (2003), Dominant Retailers and the Countervailing Power Hypothesis, RAND Journal of Economics 34, 612-625.
6. Chipty, T. and C. M. Snyder (1999), The Role of Firm Size in Bilateral Bargaining: A Study of the Cable Television Industry, Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 326-340.
7. Coursey, D., R. M. Isaac and V. Smith (1984), Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results, The Journal of Law and Economics 27, 91-113.
8. Davis, D. D., and C. A. Holt (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Davis, D. and A. Williams (1990), Market Power and the Institutional Asymmetry of the Posted-Offer Trading Institution, Economics Letters 34, 211-214.
10. Davis, D. and A. Williams (1991), The Hayek Hypothesis in Experimental Auctions: Institutional Effects and Market Power, Economic Inquiry 29, 261-274.
11. Davis, D. D. and B. J. Wilson (2004), Strategic Buyers, Horizontal Mergers and Fixed Cost Synergies: An Experimental Investigation, mimeo.
12. DeGraba, P. (2005), Quantity Discounts from Risk Averse Sellers, Federal Trade Commission, mimeo.
13. Dobson, P. W. and M. Waterson (1997), Countervailing Power and Consumer Prices, Economic Journal, 107, 418-430.
14. Ellison, S. and C. M. Snyder (2002), Countervailing Power in Wholesale Pharmaceuticals, M.I.T. mimeo.
15. Engle-Warnick, J. and B. J. Ruffle (2005a), Buyer Concentration as a Source of Countervailing Power: Evidence from Experimental Posted-Offer Markets, Ben-Gurion University, mimeo.
16. Ellison, S. and C. M. Snyder (2005b), The Strategies Behind their Actions: A Method to Infer Repeated-Game Strategies and an Application to Buyer Behavior, Ben-Gurion University, mimeo.
17. European Commission (1999), Buyer Power and Its Impact on Competition in the Food Retail Distribution Sector of the EuropeanUnion, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
18. Farber, S. (1981), Buyer Market Structure and R&D Effort: A Simultaneous Equations Model, Review of Economics and Statistics 62, 336-345.
19. Fishman, C. (2003), The Wal Mart You Don’t Know, Fast Company, December: 77, 68.
20. Fouraker, Lawrence E. and Sidney Siegel (1963), Bargaining Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Franciosi, R., P. Kujal, R. Michelitsch, V. Smith and G. Deng (1995), Fairness: effect on temporary and equilibrium prices in posted-offer markets, Economic Journal 105, 938-950.
22. Friedman, J. (1967), An Experimental Study of Cooperative Duopoly, Econometrica 35, 379-397.
23. Friedman, M. (1985), Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970-1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Summer, 96-117.
24. Galbraith, J. K. (1952), American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, chapter 9.
25. Güth, W., R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze (1982), An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 367-388.
26. Hunter, A. (1958), Notes on Countervailing Power, Economic Journal 68, 89-103.
27. Inderst, R. and C. Wey (2003), Bargaining, Mergers, and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries, RAND Journal of Economics 34, 1-19.
28. Inderst, R. and C. Wey (2007), Buyer Power and Supplier Incentives, London School of Economics, European Economic Review 51(3), 647-667.
29. Inderst, R. and G. Shaffer (2007), Retail Mergers, Buyer Power and Product Variety, The Economic Journal 117(1), 45-67.
30. Kachelmeier, S. J., S. T. Limberg and M. S. Schadewald (1991a), A Laboratory Market Examination of the Consumer Price Response to Information About Producers’ Cost and Profits, Accounting Review, 66, 694-717.
31. Kachelmeier, S. J., S. T. Limberg and M. S. Schadewald (1991b), Fairness in Markets: A laboratory investigation, Journal of Economic Psychology 12, 447-464.
32. Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch and R. Thaler (1986), Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking, American Economic Review 76, 728-741.
33. Katz, M. L. (1987), The Welfare Effects of Third Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Goods Markets, American Economic Review 77, 154-167.
34. Kling, R. W. (1988), Trucking Deregulation: Evolution of a New Power Structure, Journal of Economic Issues 22, 1201-1211.
35. Kritikos, A. and F. Bolle (2004), Punishment as a Public Good: When Should Monopolists Care about a Consumer Boycott? Journal of Economic Psychology 25, 355-372.
36. LaFrance, V. A. (1979), The Impact of Buyer Concentration-An Extension, Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 475-476.
37. Lustgarten, S. H. (1975), The Impact of Buyer Concentration in Manufacturing Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics 57, 125-132.
38. Martin, S. (1983), Vertical Relationships and Industrial Performance, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 23, 6-18.
39. McGuckin, R. and H. Chen (1976), Interactions between buyer and seller concentration and industry price-cost margins, Industrial Organization Review 4, 123-132.
40. Normann, H. T., B. J. Ruffle and C. M. Snyder (2007), Do Buyer-Size Discounts Depend on the Curvature of the Surplus Function? Experimental Tests of Bargaining Models, RAND Journal of Economics 38(3), 747-767.
41. Peters, J. (2000), Buyer Market Power and Innovative Activities: Evidence for the German Automobile Industry, Review of Industrial Organization 16, 13-38.
42. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York, NY: Free Press, chapter 1.
43. Pryor, F. L. (2001), New Trends in US Industrial Concentration, Review of Industrial Organization 18, 301-326.
44. Raskovich, A. (2003), Pivotal Buyers and Bargaining Position, Journal of Industrial Economics 51, 405-426.
45. Reeves, S. (2005), On Track for a Good Deal, Forbes.com, April 1.
46. Rotemberg, J. and G. Saloner (1986), A Supergame-Theoretic Model of Business Cycles and Price Wars During Booms, American Economic Review 76, 390-407.
47. Ruffle, B. J. (2000), Some Factors Affecting Demand Withholding in Posted-Offer Markets, Economic Theory 16, 529-544.
48. Scheffman, D. T. and P. T. Spiller (1992), Buyers’ Strategies, Entry Barriers, and Competition, Economic Inquiry 30, 418-436.
49. Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edn., Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Schumacher, U. (1991), Buyer Structure and Seller Performance in US Manufacturing Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 277-284.
51. Selten, R. and R. Stoecker (1986), End Behavior in Sequences of Finite Prisoner’s Dilemma Supergames: A Learning Theory Approach, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7, 47-70.
52. Sexton, R. J. and T. A. Sexton (1987), Cooperatives as Entrants, RAND Journal of Economics 18, 581-595.
53. Smith, V. L. (1981), An Empirical Study of Decentralized Institutions of Monopoly Restraint, in Essays in contemporary fields of economics in honor of E.T. Weiler (1914-1979), J. Quirk and G. Horwich (eds.), West Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University Press, 83-106.
54. Snyder, C. M. (1996), A Dynamic Theory of Countervailing Power, RAND Journal of Economics 27, 747-769.
55. Snyder, C. M. (1998), Why Do Large Buyers Pay Lower Prices? Intense Supplier Competition, Economics Letters 58, 205-209.
56. Snyder, C. M. (2008), Countervailing Power, in S. Durauf and L. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn., London: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Steuer, R. M. (2004), Blindside Deconcentration: Outsourcing, Power Retailers, and Antitrust, theantitrustsource, 1-8 March, available at www.antitrustsource.com.
58. Stigler, G. J. (1954), The Economist Plays with Blocs, American Economic Review, 44, 7-14
59. Tyagi, R. K. (2001), Why Do Suppliers Charge Larger Buyers Lower Prices?, Journal of Industrial Economics 49, 45-61.
60. Tyran, J. R. and D. Engelmann (2005), To Buy or Not to Buy? An Experimental Study of Consumer Boycotts in Retail Markets, Economica 72, 1-16.
61. United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1998), FTC v. Cardinal Health, Inc. and Bergen-Brunswig Corp. and FTC v. McKesson Corp. and AmeriSource Health Corp., available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/ca98595ddc.htm.
62. von Ungern-Sternberg, T. (1996), Countervailing Power Revisited, International Journal of Industrial Organization 14, 507-520.