Cultural differences in playing repeated ultimatum game online with virtual humans

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1213-1220

  Nouri, Elnaz ^a   Traum, David ^a  

^a University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

COMPUTATIONAL AGENTS; CULTURAL BACKGROUNDS; CULTURAL DIFFERENCE; DIFFERENT STAGES; EFFICIENT INTERACTION; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; LABORATORY CONDITIONS; POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84902271795     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.157     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Nouri, E., & Traum, D. (2013), A Cross-cultural Study of Playing Simple Economic Games Online with Humans and Virtual Humans. Human Computer Interaction International Conference.
2. Thomas Chesney, Swee-Hoon Chuah, Robert Hoffmann (2009), Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 72, Issue 1, October 2009, pages 618-635.
3. Nouri, E., & Traum, D. (2013). Prediction of Game Behavior Based on Culture Factors. Group Decision and Negotiation.
4. Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B. (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3(4), 367-388
5. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C, Fehr, E., Gintis, H, & Tracer, D. (2005). "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and brain sciences, 28(6), 795-814.
6. Campos-Ortiz, Francisco (2012), Security of property as a public good: Institutions, socio-political environment and experimental behavior in five countries, Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, No. 6982.
7. Roth, A.E., Prasnikar, V., Okun Fujiwara, M., Zamir, S., (1991), Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. The American Economic Review 81, 1068-1095.
8. Van't Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G, & Aleman, A. (2006), Affective state and decision-making in the ultimatum game. Experimental Brain Research, 169(4), 564-568.
9. Xiao, D., He, K., & Hu, J. (2012). Modeling Research on Decision-Making Strategies in Human-Computer and Human-Human Ultimatum Game. In Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Theory and Practice (pp. 1015-1021). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
10. Moretti, L., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2010). Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion, 10(2), 169.
11. Sanfey, A. G, Rilling, J. K, Aronson, J. A., and Nystrom., L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758.
12. Els van Dijk (2013), Investigating Rejection Behavior in the Ultimatum Game as a Measure of Anthropomorphism - Master's Thesis.
13. Horton, J., Rand, D., Zeckhauser, R. (2010) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research
14. Suri S, Watts D (2011) Cooperation and contagion in web based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS One 6:e16836
15. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling S (2011), Amazons mechanical Turk: a new source of in-expensive, yet high quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 3
16. Rand, D. (2011), The promise of mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology
17. Amir, O., & Rand, D. G. (2012). Economic games on the internet: The effect of $1 stakes. PloS one, 7(2), e31461.
18. Carpenter J, Verhoogen E, Burks S (2005), The effect of stakes in distribution experiments. Economics Letters 86: 393-398.
19. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V. (1996), On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. International Journal of Game Theory 25, 289-301.
20. Neumann, J.V., Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press
21. Camerer, C.F. (2003): Behavioral game theory - Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press
22. Nouri, E., & Traum, D. (2011). A cultural decision-making model for virtual agents playing negotiation games. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Culturally Motivated Virtual Characters. Reykjavik, Iceland.
23. Nouri, Georgila, Traum, Culture-specific Models of Negotiation for Virtual Characters (2013), Multi-attribute decision-making based on culture-specific values. Journal of AI and Society.
24. Rawls, J. (1974). Some reasons for the maximin criterion. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 141-146.
25. Forbell, E.; Kalisch, N.; Morbini, F.; Christoffersen, K.; Sagae, K.; Traum, D. & Rizzo, A. A. (2013). Roundtable: An Online Framework for Building Web-based Conversational Agents Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013, 372-374
26. Rizzo, A., Lange, B., Buckwalter, J. G., Forbell, E., Kim, J., Sagae, K., Williams, J., Roth-baum, B., Difede, J. Reger, G. Parsons, T., and Kenny, P. (2011), An Intelligent Virtual Human System for Providing Healthcare Information and Support. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 18: 503-509.
27. Morbini, F., Forbell, E., DeVault, D., Sagae, K., Traum, D., and A. Rizzo (2012), A Mixed-Initiative Conversational Dialogue System for Healthcare. Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2012 Conference
28. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864-886.
29. van't Sant, M. (2013). Development of an anthropomorphism scale. Student project thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology