Applying the multilevel framework of discourse comprehension to evaluate the text characteristics of general chemistry textbooks

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 778-783

  Pyburn, Daniel T ^a   Pazicni, Samuel ^a  

^a University of New Hampshire   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical Education Research; First Year Undergraduate General; Textbooks Reference Books

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902212503     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: 19381328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ed500006u     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gkitzia, V.; Salta, K.; Tzougraki, C. Development and Application of Suitable Criteria for the Evaluation of Chemical Representations in School Textbooks Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2011, 12 (1) 5-14
2. Thiele, R. B.; Treagust, D. F. The Nature and Extent of Analogies in Secondary Chemistry Textbooks Instr. Sci. 1994, 22 (1) 61-74
3. Thiele, R. B.; Treagust, D. F. Analogies in Chemistry Textbooks Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1995, 1 7 (6) 783-795
4. Talanquer, V. Explanations and Teleology in Chemistry Education Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 29 (7) 853-870
5. De Posada, J. M. The Presentation of Metallic Bonding in High School Science Textbooks During Three Decades: Science Educational Reforms and Substantive Changes of Tendencies Sci. Educ. 1999, 83 (4) 423-447
6. Sanger, M. J.; Greenbowe, T. An Analysis of College Chemistry Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76 (6) 853-860
7. Han, J. Y.; Roth, W. M. Chemical Inscriptions in Korean Textbooks: Semiotics of Macro- and Microworld Sci. Educ. 2006, 90 (2) 173-201
8. Dávila, K.; Talanquer, V. Classifying End-of-Chapter Questions and Problems for Selected General Chemistry Textbooks Used in the United States J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87 (1) 97-101
9. Callender, A. A.; McDaniel, M. A. The Benefits of Embedded Question Adjuncts for Low and High Structure Builders J. Educ. Psychol. 2007, 99 (2) 339-348
10. Caverly, D. C.; Orlando, V. P.; Mullen, J. A. L. In Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research, Flippo, R. F.; Caverly, D. C., Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2000; pp 105-147.
11. Graesser, A. C.; Millis, K. K.; Zwaan, R. A. Discourse Comprehension Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1997, 48 (1) 163-189
12. Graesser, A. C.; McNamara, D. S. Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension Top. Cognit. Sci. 2011, 3 (2) 371-398
13. Graesser, A. C.; McNamara, D. S.; Louwerse, M. M.; Cai, Z. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and Language Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 2004, 36 (2) 193-202
14. McNamara, D. S.; Louwerse, M. M.; McCarthy, P. M.; Graesser, A. C. Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion Discourse Processes 2010, 47 (4) 292-330
15. McNamara, D. S.; Magliano, J. Towards a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation; Ross, B., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, NY, 2008; Vol. 51, pp 297-384.
16. McNamara, D. S.; Graesser, A. C.; Cai, Z. Coh-Metrix Easability Components: Aligning Text Difficulty with Theories of Text Comprehension. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011.
17. Bruner, J. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986.
18. Graesser, A. C.; Olde, B.; Klettke, B. How Does the Mind Construct and Represent Stories? In Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations; Green, M. C.; Strange, J. J.; Brock, T. C., Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2002; pp 231-263.
19. Haberlandt, K.; Graesser, A. C. Component Processes in Text Comprehension and Some of Their Interactions J. Exp. Psychol. 1985, 114 (3) 357-374
20. O'Reilly, T.; McNamara, D. S. Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can Be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge Readers Discourse Processes 2007, 43 (2) 121-152
21. Graesser, A. C.; McNamara, D. S.; Louwerse, M. M. What Do Readers Need to Learn in Order to Process Coherence Relations in Narrative and Expository Text? In Rethinking Reading Comprehension; Sweet, A. P.; Snow, C. E., Eds.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, 2003; pp 82-98.
22. McNamara, D. S. Reading Both High and Low Coherence Texts: Effects of Text Sequence and Prior Knowledge Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2001, 55 (1) 51-62
23. McNamara, D. S.; Kintsch, W. Learning from Text: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Coherence Discourse Processes 1996, 22 (3) 247-287
24. McNamara, D. S.; Kintsch, E.; Songer, N. B.; Kintsch, W. Are Good Texts Always Better? Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning from Text Cognit. Instr. 1996, 14 (1) 1-43
25. Voss, J.; Silfies, L. Learning from History Text: The Interaction of Knowledge and Comprehension Skill with Text Structure Cognit. Instr. 1996, 14 (1) 45-68
26. Pyburn, D. T.; Pazicni, S.; Benassi, V. A.; Tappin, E. Assessing the Relation between Language Comprehension and Performance in General Chemistry Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2013, 14 (4) 524-541
27. Silberberg, M. S. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change, 6 th ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, 2012.
28. Tro, N. J. Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2 nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Boston, MA, 2011.
29. Zumdahl, S. S.; Zumdahl, S. A. Chemistry, 9 th ed.; Brooks/Cole: Belmont, CA, 2014.
30. Brown, T. L.; LeMay, H. E., Jr.; Bursten, B. E.; Murphey, C. J.; Woodward, P. M. Chemistry: The Central Science, 12 th ed.; Prentice Hall: Boston, MA, 2012.
31. Chang, R.; Goldsby, K. A. Chemistry, 11 th ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, 2013.
32. Carroll, K. Cengage Learning: Boston, MA. Personal communication, 2013.
33. Brown, D. Inferno; Doubleday: New York, 2013.
34. James, E. L. Fifty Shades of Grey; Vintage Books: New York, 2011.
35. McNamara, D. S.; Louwerse, M. M.; Cai, Z.; Graesser, A. Coh-Metrix Version 3.0. http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu (accessed Mar 2014).
36. Cohen, J. W. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2 nd ed.; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
37. McCarthy, P. M.; Lightman, E. J.; Duffy, D. F.; McNamara, D. S. Using Coh-Metrix to Assess Distributions of Cohesion and Difficulty: An Investigation of the Structure of High-School Textbooks. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada, 2006.