System training and assessment in simultaneous proportional myoelectric prosthesis control

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Fougner, Anders L ^a   Stavdahl, Øyvind ^a   Kyberd, Peter J ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Estimation; Myoelectric control; Proportional control; Prosthesis guided training; Prosthetic hand; Prosthetics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROL SYSTEM; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADULT; ARM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY;

ADULT; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 84902188217     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-75     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Control of upper limb prostheses: Terminology and proportional myoelectric control-a review. Fougner A, Kyberd PJ, Losier YG, Parker PA, Stavdahl Ø IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012 20 5 663 677 [ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6205630 ] 22665514
2. Signals and signal processing for myoelectric control. Lovely DF, Powered upper limb prostheses: Control, implementation and clinical application Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Muzumdar A, 2004 35 53
3. Comparison of regression models for estimation of isometric wrist joint torques using surface electromyography. Ziai A, Menon C, J NeuroEng Rehabil 2011 8 [ http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/8/1/56 ]
4. Effect of arm position on the prediction of kinematics from EMG in amputees. Jiang N, Muceli S, Graimann B, Farina D, Med Biol Eng Comput 2013 51 143 151 [doi:10.1007/s11517-012-0979-4] 10.1007/s11517-012-0979-4 23090099
5. Simultaneous and proportional estimation of hand kinematics from EMG during mirrored movements at multiple degrees-of-freedom. Muceli S, Farina D, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012 20 3 371 378 [doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2011. 2178039] 22180516
6. Simultaneous and proportional control of 2D wrist movements with myoelectric signals. Hahne JM, Rehbaum H, Biessmann F, Meinecke FC, Müller KR, Parra LC, Jiang N, Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Signal Proc. (MLSP) Santander, Spain 2012 [ http://bme.ccny.cuny.edu/faculty/lparra/publish/Hahne- mlsp2012.pdf ]
7. A comparison between force and position control strategies in myoelectric prostheses. Ameri A, Englehart KB, Parker PA, Proc. of the IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf. (EMBC) IEEE EMBS: IEEE 2012 1342 1345
8. User-in-the-loop continuous and proportional control of a virtual prosthesis in a posture matching task. Pulliam CL, Lambrecht JM, Kirsch RF, Proc. of the IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf(EMBC), Volume 34 IEEE: IEEE EMBS 2012 3557 3559
9. Real-time myoelectric control in a virtual environment to relate usability vs. accuracy. Lock B, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, Proc. of the Myoelectric Controls Symposium (MEC) NB, Canada: Fredericton 2005 [ http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/2721 ]
10. A real-time pattern recognition based myoelectric control usability study implemented in a virtual environment. Hargrove L, Losier YG, Lock B, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, Proc. of the IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf. (EMBC) IEEE EMBS: IEEE 2007 4842 4845
11. A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Hargrove LJ, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, 2008 3 2 175 180 [ http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1746809407001012 ]
12. Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Scheme E, Fougner A, Chan ADC, Englehart KB, Stavdahl Ø Proc. of the IEEE Eng. MedBiol. Soc. Conf. (EMBC), Volume 32 IEEE EMBS: IEEE 2010 6337 6340
13. Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. Fougner A, Scheme E, Chan ADC, Englehart K, Stavdahl Ø IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011 19 6 644 651 [ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/ articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5985538 ] 21846608
14. Improving myoelectric pattern recognition positional robustness using advanced training protocols. Scheme E, Biron K, Englehart KB, Proc. of the IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf(EMBC), Volume 33 IEEE EMBS: IEEE 2011 4828 4831
15. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures (ULPOM): a working group and their findings. Hill W, Hermansson LN, Kyberd PJ, Swanson S, Hubbard S, Stavdahl Ø J Prosthet Orthot 2009 9 69 82
16. Towards a common language for functionary, disability and health: ICF beginner's guide. World Health Organization, WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3 2002 [ http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf ]
17. Summary and recommendations of the academy's state of the science conference on upper limb prosthetic outcome measures. Miller LA, Swanson S, 2009 9 83 89 [ http://www.oandp.org/jpo/library/2009\-04S\-083.asp ]
18. Prosthesis-guided training for practical use of pattern recognition control of prostheses. Lock B, Simon AM, Stubblefield K, Hargrove L, Proc. of the Myoelectric Controls Symposium (MEC) NB, Canada: Fredericton 2011 [ http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/4713 ]
19. Prosthesis-guided training increases functional wear time and improves tolerance to malfunctioning inputs of pattern recognition-controlled prostheses. Simon AM, Lock B, Stubblefield K, Hargrove L, Proc. of the Myoelectric Controls Symposium (MEC) NB, Canada: Fredericton 2011 [ http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/ dspace/handle/10161/4725/ ]
20. Trigno®; Wireless system user's guide. DelSys Inc, 2013 [ http://www.delsys.com/Products/TrignoFamily.html ]
21. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Kyberd PJ, Hill W, Prosthet Orthot Int 2011 35 2 234 241 [ http://poi.sagepub.com/content/35/2/234.abstract ] 10.1177/0309364611409099 21697204
22. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis C, Bongers R, Arch Phys Med Rehab 2010 91 9 1442 1446 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.025
23. A decision-based velocity ramp for minimizing the effect of misclassifications during real-time pattern recognition control. Simon A, Hargrove L, Lock B, Kuiken T, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011 58 8 2360 2368
24. The optimal controller delay for myoelectric prostheses. Farrell T, Weir R, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 111 118 17436883
25. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. Hudgins B, Parker PA, Scott RN, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993 40 82 94 10.1109/10.204774 8468080
26. Uno Strumento Per la Rivelazione e la Misura di Alcuni Parametri dei Potenziali Mioelettrici [in Italian]. Isidori A, Nicolò F, Rapporto interno no. II, Electrotechnical Institute, Sapienza Università, di Roma 1966
27. Hand prosthesis with continuous myoelectric control [in English]. Isidori A, Monteleone M, Nicolò F, Automazione e Strumentazione 1967 15 3 98 105
28. Loomis A, Figure Drawing for All It's Worth Irvine, CA, US: Walter Foster 1943
29. Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Miller L, Lipschutz R, Stubblefield K, Lock B, Huang H, Williams T, Weir R, Kuiken T, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 11 2057 2065 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.016 18996233
30. Targeted reinnervation to improve prosthesis control in transhumeral amputees: A report of three cases. O'Shaughnessy K, Dumanian G, Lipschutz R, Miller L, Stubblefield K, Kuiken T, J Bone Joint Surg 2008 90 2 393 400 18245601
31. Patient training for functional use of pattern recognition-controlled prostheses. Simon A, Lock B, Stubblefield K, J Prosthet Orthot 2012 24 2 56 64 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3182515437 22563231
32. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Light C, Chappell P, Kyberd P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 776 783 10.1053/apmr.2002. 32737 12048655
33. Case studies to demonstrate the range of applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Kyberd P, Murgia A, Gasson M, Tjerks T, Metcalf C, Chappell P, Warwick K, Lawson S, Barnhill T, 2009 72 5 212 218
34. Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure, Southampton, UK 2012 [ http://www.shap.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ ]
35. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. Atkins DJ, Heard DC, Donovan WH, J Prosthet Orthot 1996 8 2 11 10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003
36. Functional Outcomes in the WHO-ICF Model: establishment of the upper limb prosthetic outcome measures group. Hill W, Hermansson LN, Kyberd PJ, Swanson S, Hubbard S, Stavdahl Ø J Prosthet Orthot 2009 21 2 115 119 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181a1d2dc
37. Changes in prehension, force control, and gaze when learning to use a myoelectric simulator with a MyoHand VariPlus Speed. Bongers RM, Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, World Congress of the Int. Soc. of Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) Leipzig, Germany 2010
38. Trent International Prosthetics Symposium (TIPS). Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Loughborough, Trent, UK 2012