Implant breast reconstruction and radiation: A multicenter analysis of long-term health-related quality of life and satisfaction

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 2159-2164

  Albornoz, Claudia R ^a   Matros, Evan ^a   McCarthy, Colleen M ^a   Klassen, Anne ^b   Cano, Stefan J ^c   Alderman, Amy K ^d   Vanlaeken, Nancy ^e   Lennox, Peter ^e   Macadam, Sheina A ^e   Disa, Joseph J ^a   Mehrara, Babak J ^a   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a   Pusic, Andrea L ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d Private Practice   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANADA; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL WELL BEING; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL WELL BEING; UNITED STATES; WELLBEING; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANADA; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84902182814     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3483-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:956-62.
2. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:949-55.
3. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1641-8.
4. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001(30):5-15.
5. Taghian A, Jeong JH, Mamounas E, et al. Patterns of locoregional failure in patients with operable breast cancer treated by mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen and without radiotherapy: results from five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4247-54.
6. Chua B, Olivotto IA, Weir L, Kwan W, Truong P, Ragaz J. Increased use of adjuvant regional radiotherapy for node-positive breast cancer in British Columbia. Breast J. 2004;10:38-44.
7. Trovo M, Durofil E, Polesel J, et al. Locoregional failure in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy and adjuvant systemic therapy: which patients benefit from postmastectomy irradiation? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:e153-7.
8. Tendulkar RD, Rehman S, Shukla ME, et al. Impact of postmastectomy radiation on locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes treated with modern systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:e577-81.
9. Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1539-69.
10. Harris JR, Halpin-Murphy P, McNeese M, Mendenhall NP, Morrow M, Robert NJ. Consensus Statement on postmastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:989-90.
11. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15-23.
12. Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:658-66; discussion 666.
13. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886-92.
14. Nava MB, Pennati AE, Lozza L, Spano A, Zambetti M, Catanuto G. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:353-9.
15. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:825-31.
16. Ho A, Cordeiro P, Disa J, et al. Long-term outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation. Cancer. 2012;118:2552-9.
17. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:395-408.
18. McCarthy CM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer. 2010;116:5584-91.
19. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
20. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293-302.
21. Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, Sloan JA, Lenderking WR, Aaronson NK. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:70.
22. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345-53.
23. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
24. US Food and Drug Administration. Patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims; 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2012.
25. Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, Klok J, Cano SJ. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Women's Health. 2009;9:11.
26. Clapham PJ, Pushman AG, Chung KC. A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1826-33.
27. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:832-9.
28. Khansa I, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous lumpectomy and radiation therapy: analysis of complications and satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:444-51.
29. Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook EF Jr, Lennox PA, Pusic AL. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:761-71.
30. Koslow S, Pharmer LA, Scott AM, et al. Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3422-9.
31. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1-8.