Assessments of jaw bone density at implant sites using 3D cone-beam computed tomography

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1398-1403

  Hao, Y ^a   Zhao, W ^a   Wang, Y ^a   Yu, J ^a   Zou, D ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Bone classification; Bone density; CBCT; Implant

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SOFTWARE; JAW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELATIVE DENSITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84902166411     PISSN: 11283602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. LEKHOLM U, ZARB GA Patient selection and preparation In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson Ts, eds. Proceedings of the Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Quintessence Publ Co., 1985; pp. 199-209.
2. MISCH CE. Density of bone: Effect on treatment planning, surgical approach, and healing In: Misch CEs, ed. Proceedings of the Contemporary implant dentistry. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1993; pp. 469-485.
3. TURKYILMAZ I, TOZUM T F, TUMER C, OZBEK EN Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 881-888. (Pubitemid 44807558)
4. TURKYILMAZ I, TOZUM T F, TUMER C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 267-272.
5. NORTON MR, GAMBLE C. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. (Pubitemid 33723216)
6. LOUBELE M, GUERRERO ME, JACOBS R, SUETENS P, VAN STEENBERGHE D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 446-454.
7. LOUBELE M, MAES F, SCHUTYSER F, MARCHAL G, JACOBS R, SUETENS P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 225-234. (Pubitemid 44094163)
8. KOBAYASHI K, SHIMODA S, NAKAGAWA Y, YAMAMOTO A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 228-231. (Pubitemid 38561060)
9. PINSKY HM, DYDA S, PINSKY RW, MISCH KA, SARMENT DP Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410-416. (Pubitemid 44904797)
10. TRISI P, RAO W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 1-7.
11. ENGQUIST B, BERGENDAL T, KALLUS T, LINDEN U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 129-134.
12. JAFFIN RA, BERMAN CL The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62: 2-4.
13. JEMT T, BOOK K, LINDEN B, URDE G. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted over-dentures supported by Branemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: A study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 162-167.
14. VANNIER MW. Craniofacial computed tomography scanning: technology, applications and future trends. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 Suppl 1: 23-30; discussion 179-182
15. SUKOVIC P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6(Suppl 1): 31-36; discussion 179-182
16. MOZZO P PROCACCI C, TACCONI A, MARTINI PT, ANDREIS IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564. (Pubitemid 128662693)
17. SCHULZE D, HEILAND M, THURMANN H, ADAM G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4-and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 83-86.
18. CANN CE. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: A review. Radiology 1988; 166:509-522. (Pubitemid 18030768)
19. DEVLIN H, HORNER K, LEDGERTON D. A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 323-327.
20. AZEREDO F, DE MENEZES LM, ENCISO R, WEISSHEIMER A, DE OLIVEIRA RB. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 147-155.
21. SCARFE WC, FARMAN AG, SUKOVIC P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80. (Pubitemid 43326970)
22. NACKAERTS O, MAES F, YAN H, COUTO SOUZA P, PAUWELS R, JACOBS R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 873-879. Municipality Municipality