Comparing no-flow time during endotracheal intubation versus placement of a laryngeal mask airway during a simulated cardiac arrest scenario

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 156-160

  Miller, Vincent J ^a   Flaherty, Erin E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Aspen Valley Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Laryngeal mask airway; No flow time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RESUSCITATION; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MANIKINS; MIDDLE AGED; RESPIRATORY THERAPY; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84902086470     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010;122(Suppl 3):S640YS656.
2. Konrad C, Schupfer G,Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998;88:635-639. (Pubitemid 28119435)
3. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: Learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003;98:23-27. (Pubitemid 36043404)
4. Wahlen BM, Roewer N, Lange M, Kranke P. Tracheal intubation and alternative airway management devices used by healthcare professionals with different level of pre-existing skills: A manikin study. Anaesthesia 2009;64:549-554.
5. Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:260-263. (Pubitemid 24242241)
6. Murdoch H, Cook TM. Effective ventilation during CPR via an LMA-Supreme. Anaesthesia 2008;63:316-327.
7. Stone BJ, Leach AB, Alexander CA, et al. The use of the laryngeal mask airway by nurses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anaesthesia 1994;49:3-7. (Pubitemid 24030490)
8. Wiese CH, Bartels U, Schultens A, et al. Using a laryngeal tube suction-device (LTS-D) reduces the ''no flow time'' in a single rescuer manikin study. J Emerg Med 2011;41:128-134.
9. Wiese CHR, Bartels U, Bergmann A, Bergmann I, Bahr J, Graf B. Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces ''no flow time'' in a manikin study: A comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008;120:217-223.
10. Wiese CHR, Bahr J,Hinz JM, Graf BM. Influence of airway management strategy on ''no-flow-Time'' in a standardized single rescuer manikin scenario (a comparison between LTS-D and I-gel). Resuscitation 2009;80:100-103.
11. Kohama H, Komasawa N, Ueki R, et al. Comparison of supreme and soft seal laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: A manikin study. J Anesth 2011;25:98-103.
12. Gatward JJ. Thomas MJC, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:351-356. (Pubitemid 351773637)
13. Stone BJ, Chantler PJ, Baskett PJF. The incidence of regurgitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A comparison between the bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway. Resuscitation 1998;38:3-6. (Pubitemid 28438444)
14. Jackson KM, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007;62:388-393. (Pubitemid 46487251)
15. Schebasta K, Hupfl M, Rossler B, et al. Airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers. Anesthesiology 2012;16: 1204-1209.