Particle margination and its implications on intravenous anticancer drug delivery

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 762-771

  Carboni, Erik ^a   Tschudi, Katherine ^b   Nam, Jaewook ^c   Lu, Xiuling ^a   Ma, Anson W K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

blood; cancer; margination; nanocarriers; nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; NANOCARRIER; NANOPARTICLE; DRUG CARRIER;

DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ERYTHROCYTE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; NANOMEDICINE; PHARMACEUTICS; PROCEDURES;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVENOUS; ANIMALS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DRUG CARRIERS; ERYTHROCYTES; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOMEDICINE; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 84902008778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-014-0099-6     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Munn L, Dupin M. Blood cell interactions and segregation in flow. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(4):534-44.
2. Jain A, Munn LL. Biomimetic postcapillary expansions for enhancing rare blood cell separation on a microfluidic chip. Lab Chip. 2011;11(17):2941-7.
3. Hou HW, Bhagat AAS, Chong AGL, Mao P, Tan KSW, Han JY, et al. Deformability based cell margination - a simple microfluidic design for malaria-infected erythrocyte separation. Lab Chip. 2010;10(19):2605-13.
4. Hou HW, Gan HY, Bhagat AAS, Li LD, Lim CT, Han J. A microfluidics approach towards high-throughput pathogen removal from blood using margination. Biomicrofluidics. 2012;6(2):13.
5. Gentile F, Chiappini C, Fine D, Bhavane RC, Peluccio MS, Cheng MMC, et al. The effect of shape on the margination dynamics of non-neutrally buoyant particles in two-dimensional shear flows. J Biomech. 2008;41(10):2312-8.
6. Godin B, Serda RE, Sakamoto J, Decuzzi P, Ferrari M. Nanoparticles for cancer detection and therapy. Nanotechnology: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2010.
7. Decuzzi P, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Ferrari M. Intravascular delivery of particulate systems: does geometry really matter? Pharm Res. 2009;26(1):235-43.
8. Kumar A, Graham MD. Mechanism of margination in confined flows of blood and other multicomponent suspensions. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109(10):5.
9. Toetsch S, Olwell P, Prina-Mello A, Volkov Y. The evolution of chemotaxis assays from static models to physiologically relevant platforms. Integr Biol. 2009;1(2):170-81.
10. Dutrochet H. Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur la structure intime des animaux et des végétaux, et sur leur motilité: J. B. Baillière; 1824.
11. Vejlens G. The distribution of leukocytes in the vascular system. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (Suppl). 1938;33:1-239.
12. Langer HF, Chavakis T. Leukocyte-endothelial interactions in inflammation. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(7):1211-20.
13. Charoenphol P, Onyskiw PJ, Carrasco-Teja M, Eniola-Adefeso O. Particle-cell dynamics in human blood flow: implications for vascular-targeted drug delivery. J Biomech. 2012;45(16):2822-8.
14. Lim EJ, Ober TJ, Edd JF, McKinley GH, Toner M. Visualization of microscale particle focusing in diluted and whole blood using particle trajectory analysis. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2199-210.
15. Namdee K, Thompson AJ, Charoenphol P, Eniola-Adefeso O. Margination propensity of vascular-targeted spheres from blood flow in a microfluidic model of human microvessels. Langmuir. 2013;29(8):2530-5.
16. Segré G, Silberberg A. Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow Part 2. Experimental results and interpretation. J Fluid Mech. 1962;14(01):136-57.
17. Gulan U, Luthi B, Holzner M, Liberzon A, Tsinober A, Kinzelbach W. Experimental study of aortic flow in the ascending aorta via particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids. 2012;53(5):1469-85.
18. Di Carlo D. Inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2009;9(21):3038-46.
19. Goldsmith HL, Spain S. Margination of leukocytes in blood-flow through small tubes. Microvasc Res. 1984;27(2):204-22. (Pubitemid 14152691)
20. Fedosov DA, Caswell B, Popel AS, Karniadakis GE. Blood flow and cell-free layer in microvessels. Microcirculation. 2010;17(8):615-28.
21. Abkarian M, Viallat A. Dynamics of vesicles in a wall-bounded shear flow. Biophys J. 2005;89(2):1055-66. (Pubitemid 41098988)
22. Abkarian M, Lartigue C, Viallat A. Tank treading and unbinding of deformable vesicles in shear flow: determination of the lift force. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;88(6):068103.
23. Mohandas N, Chasis JA. Red blood cell deformability, membrane material properties and shape: regulation by transmembrane, skeletal and cytosolic proteins and lipids. Semin Hematol. 1993;30(3):171-92. (Pubitemid 23216313)
24. Ferri M, Lombardini S, Pallotti C, editors. Leukocyte classifications by size functions. Applications of Computer Vision, 1994, Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on; 1994 5-7 Dec 1994.
25. Schmid-Schönbein GW, Usami S, Skalak R, Chien S. The interaction of leukocytes and erythrocytes in capillary and postcapillary vessels. Microvasc Res. 1980;19(1):45-70. (Pubitemid 10207818)
26. Fedosov DA, Fornleitner J, Gompper G. Margination of white blood cells in microcapillary flow. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108(2):028104.
27. Bishop JJ, Popel AS, Intaglietta M, Johnson PC. Effects of erythrocyte aggregation and venous network geometry on red blood cell axial migration. Am J Physiol-Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281(2):H939-50.
28. Kirby B. Micro- and nanoscale fluid mechanics: transport in microfluidic devices. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
29. Einstein A, Fürth R. Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. Dover Publications; 1956.
30. Toy R, Hayden E, Shoup C, Baskaran H, Karathanasis E. The effects of particle size, density and shape on margination of nanoparticles in microcirculation. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(11):9.
31. Charoenphol P, Huang RB, Eniola-Adefeso O. Potential role of size and hemodynamics in the efficacy of vascular-targeted spherical drug carriers. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1392-402.
32. Gentile F, Curcio A, Indolfi C, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P. The margination propensity of spherical particles for vascular targeting in the microcirculation. J Nanobiotechnology. 2008;6:9.
33. Tan JF, Shah S, Thomas A, Ou-Yang HD, Liu YL. The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2013;14(1-2):77-87.
34. Tan JF, Thomas A, Liu YL. Influence of red blood cells on nanoparticle targeted delivery in microcirculation. Soft Matter. 2012;8(6):1934-46.
35. Decuzzi P, Gentile F, Granaldi A, Curcio A, Causa F, Indolfi C, et al. Flow chamber analysis of size effects in the adhesion of spherical particles. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2(4):689-96.
36. Liu Y, Tan J, Thomas A, Ou-Yang D, Muzykantov VR. The shape of things to come: importance of design in nanotechnology for drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2012;3(2):181-94.
37. Lee SY, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P. Design of bio-mimetic particles with enhanced vascular interaction. J Biomech. 2009;42(12):1885-90.
38. Lee SY, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P. Shaping nano-/micro-particles for enhanced vascular interaction in laminar flows. Nanotechnology. 2009;20(49):11.
39. Decuzzi P, Lee S, Bhushan B, Ferrari M. A theoretical model for the margination of particles within blood vessels. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33(2):179-90. (Pubitemid 40509493)
40. Lee TR, Choi M, Kopacz AM, Yun SH, Liu WK, Decuzzi P. On the near-wall accumulation of injectable particles in the microcirculation: smaller is not better. Sci Rep. 2013;3:8.
41. Doshi N, Prabhakarpandian B, Rea-Ramsey A, Pant K, Sundaram S, Mitragotri S. Flow and adhesion of drug carriers in blood vessels depend on their shape: a study using model synthetic microvascular networks. J Control Release. 2010;146(2):196-200.
42. Freund JB. Leukocyte margination in a model microvessel. Phys Fluids. 2007;19(2):13.
43. Kumar A, Graham MD. Segregation by membrane rigidity in flowing binary suspensions of elastic capsules. Phys Rev E. 2011;84(6):17.
44. Kumar A, Graham MD. Margination and segregation in confined flows of blood and other multicomponent suspensions. Soft Matter. 2012;8(41):10536-48.
45. Nobis U, Pries AR, Cokelet GR, Gaehtgens P. Radial distribution of white cells during blood flow in small tubes. Microvasc Res. 1985;29(3):295-304. (Pubitemid 16158225)
46. Abbitt KB, Nash GB. Characteristics of leucocyte adhesion directly observed in flowing whole blood in vitro. Br J Haematol. 2001;112(1):55-63. (Pubitemid 32151150)
47. Firrell JC, Lipowsky HH. Leukocyte margination and deformation in mesenteric venules of rat. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(6):H1667-74.
48. Jain A, Munn LL. Determinants of leukocyte margination in rectangular microchannels. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):8.
49. Pearson MJ, Lipowsky HH. Influence of erythrocyte aggregation on leukocyte margination in postcapillary venules of rat mesentery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279(4):H1460-71.
50. Yang XX, Forouzan O, Burns JM, Shevkoplyas SS. Traffic of leukocytes in microfluidic channels with rectangular and rounded cross-sections. Lab Chip. 2011;11(19):3231-40.
51. Prabhakarpandian B, Wang Y, Rea-Ramsey A, Sundaram S, Kiani MF, Pant K. Bifurcations: focal points of particle adhesion in microvascular networks. Microcirculation. 2011;18(5):380-9.
52. Carugo D, Capretto L, Nehru E, Mansour M, Smyth N, Bressloff N, et al. A microfluidic-based arteriolar network model for biophysical and bioanalytical investigations. Curr Anal Chem. 2013;9(1):47-59.
53. Perry JL, Herlihy KP, Napier ME, Desimone JM. PRINT: a novel platform toward shape and size specific nanoparticle theranostics. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44(10):990-8.
54. Doi M, Makino M. Sedimentation of particles of general shape. Phys Fluids. 2005;17(4):7.