Designing for quality: The understanding dementia MOOC

Electronic Journal of e-Learning

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 161-171

  King, Carolyn ^a   Kelder, Jo Anne ^a   Doherty, Kathleen ^a   Phillips, Rob ^b   McInerney, Fran ^c   Walls, Justin ^a   Robinson, Andrew ^a   Vickers, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dementia; Design; Education; MOOC; Online learning; Open education resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901983090     PISSN: 14794403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012. Dementia in Australia, Cat. No. AGE 70. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
2. Borden, J. 2012. Flipping The MOOC? FWD. PEARSON. COM [Online]. Available: http://fwd.pearson.com/2012/09/27/flipping-the-mooc/ [Accessed 7 May 2013].
3. Checkland, P. & Scholes, J. 1999. Soft Systems Methodology in Action (including a 30-year retrospective), Chitchester, John Wiley and Sons.
4. Collis, B. 1996. Tele-learning in a Digital World: The Future of Distance Learning, International Thomson Computer Press.
5. Daniel, J. 2012. Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012.
6. Devlin, K. 2014. MOOCtalk: Let's teach the world [Online]. Available: http://mooctalk.org/ [Accessed January 2013].
7. Di Giulio, P., Toscani, F., Villani, D., Brunelli, C., Gentile, S. & Spadin, P. 2008. Dying with Advanced Dementia in Long-Term Care Geriatric Institutions: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11, 1023-8.
8. Downes, S. 2012. Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council, Canada.
9. Grimley, M., Green, R., Nilsen, T. & Thompson, D. 2012. Comparing Computer Game and Traditional Lecture Using Experience Ratings From High and Low Achieving Students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 619-638.
10. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L. & Turoff, M. 1995. Learning Networks-a Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online, Cambridge Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
11. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C. & Oliver, R. 2010. A guide to authentic e-learning, New York and London, Routledge.
12. Khan Academy 2011. Cervical Spine Protection in Airway Management (not a substitute for formal training), [Online], Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DJY89_jC_ZY. [Accessed 6 January 2014]
13. Knox, J., Bayne, S., Macleod, H., Ross, J. & Sinclair, C. 2012. MOOC pedagogy: the challenges of developing for Coursera [Online]. Association for Learning Technology. Available: http://newsletter.alt.ac.uk/2012/08/mooc-pedagogy-the-challenges-of-developing-for-coursera/ [Accessed 7 May 2013].
14. Laurillard, D. 1993. Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology, London, Routledge.
15. Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.), London, Routledge.
16. Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a Design Science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology, New York, Routledge.
17. Littlejohn, A. & Pegler, C. 2007. Preparing for blended e-learning, Abingdon, U.K., Routledge.
18. Mitchell, S., Kiely, D. & Hamel, M. 2004. Dying with Advanced Dementia in the Nursing Home. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164.
19. Muntean, C. I. Raising Engagement in E-Learning Through Gamification. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, 28-29 October 2011 2011 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 323-329.
20. Norton, A. 2013. The online evolution: when technology meets tradition in higher education. The Grattan Institute.
21. Norvig, P. 2012. Peter Norvig: The 100,000-student classroom [Online]. Available: http://www.ted.com/talks/peter_norvig_the_100_000_student_classroom.html [Accessed 9 May 2013].
22. Penn Graduate School of Education Press Room 2013. Penn GSE Study Shows MOOCs Have Relatively Few Active Users, With Only a Few Persisting to Course End [Online]. Available: http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pressroom/press-releases/2013/12/penn-gse-study-shows-moocs-have-relatively-few-active-users-only-few-persisti [Accessed January 2013].
23. Phillips, R., Mcnaught, C. & Kennedy, G. 2012. Evaluating e-learning: guiding research and practice, New York, Routledge.
24. Pittman, N., Vickers, J., Robinson, A., Walls, J., King, C., Carew, T., Padgett, L., Canty, A. & Kelder, J.-A. 2012. Understanding Dementia MOOC Business Case. University of Tasmania.
25. Rittel, H. W. J. 1984 [1972]. "Second Generation Design Methods"; Interview in: Design Methods Group 5th Anniversary Report: DMG Occasional Paper, 1, 5-10. Reprinted in. In: CROSS, N. (ed.) Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
26. Salmon, G. 2000. E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online, London, Kogan Page.
27. Salmon, G. 2003. E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online, London; New York, RoutledgeFalmer.
28. Sampson, E., Ritchie, C., Lai, R., Raven, P. & Blanchard, M. 2005. A Systematic Review of the Scientific Evidence for the Efficacy of a Palliative Care Approach in Advanced Dementia. International Psychogeriatrics: The Official Journal of The International Psychogeriatric Association, 17, 31-40.
29. Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action, New York, Basic Books.
30. Siemens, G. 2012. MOOCs are really a platform. ElearnSpace [Online]. Available: http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/ [Accessed 7 May 2013].
31. Van Den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., Mckenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (eds.) 2006. Educational design research, Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.