Localization of ultrasound-induced invivo neurostimulation in the mouse model

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1512-1522

  King, Randy L ^a,b   Brown, Julian R ^c,d   Pauly, Kim Butts ^a,b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Electromyography; Invivo; Neuromodulation; Neurostimulation; Therapeutic ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MAMMALS; NEURONS; SONICATION;

IN-VIVO; LOCALIZED EFFECTS; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROSTIMULATION; NEW APPLICATIONS; THERAPEUTIC TOOLS; THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND BEAMS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CAUDAL BRAIN REGION; CONNECTOME; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; IN VIVO STUDY; LATENT PERIOD; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOUSE; NECK; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROSTRAL BRAIN REGION; TAIL; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND INDUCED NEUROSTIMULATION; ANIMAL; EFFERENT NERVE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MICE; MODELS, ANIMAL; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS, EFFERENT; SONICATION;

EID: 84901976057     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brus-Ramer M., Carmel J.B., Martin J.H. Motor cortex bilateral motor representation depends on subcortical and interhemispheric interactions. JNeurosci 2009, 29:6196-6206.
2. Bucy P.C., Fulton J.F. Ipsilateral representation in the motor and premotor cortex of monkeys. Brain 1933, 56:318-342.
3. Bystritsky A., Korb A.S., Douglas P.K., Cohen M.S., Melega W.P., Mulgaonkar A.P., DeSalles A., Min B.K., Yoo S.S. Areview of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul 2011, 4:125-136.
4. Clement G.T., White P.J., King R.L., McDannold N., Hynynen K. Amagnetic resonance imaging- compatible, large-scale array for trans-skull ultrasound surgery and therapy. JUltrasound Med 2005, 24:1117-1125.
5. Fitzgerald P.B., Daskalakis Z.J. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. Expert Rev Med Devices 2011, 8:85-95.
6. Fry F.J., Ades H.W., Fry W.J. Production of reversible changes in the central nervous system by ultrasound. Science 1958, 127:83-84.
7. Garol H.W. The "motor" cortex of the cat. JNeuropathol Exp Neurol 1942, l:139-142.
8. Gavrilov L.R., Tsirulnikov E.M., Davies I.A. Application of focused ultrasound for the stimulation of neural structures. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996, 22:179-192.
9. Harvey E.N. The effect of high-frequency sound waves on heart muscle and other irritable tissues. Am J Physiol 1929, 91:284-290.
10. Hynynen K., McDannold N., Clement G., Jolesz F.A., Zadicario E., Killiany R., Moore T., Rosen D. Preclinical testing of a phased array ultrasound system for MRI-guided noninvasive surgery of the brain: A primate study. Eur J Radiology 2006, 59:149-156.
11. Kim H., Taghados S.J., Fischer K., Maeng L.S., Park S., Yoo S.S. Noninvasive transcranial stimulation of rat abducens nerve by focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012, 38:1568-1575.
12. King R.L., Brown J.R., Newsome W.T., Pauly K.B. Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced invivo neurostimulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013, 39:312-331.
13. Lalumiere R.T. Anew technique for controlling the brain: Optogenetics and its potential for use in research and the clinic. Brain Stimul 2011, 4:1-6.
14. Lauer E.W. Ipsilateral facial representation in motor cortex of macaque. JNeurophysiol 1952, 15:1-4.
15. Li C.X., Waters R.S. Organization of the mouse motor cortex studied by retrograde tracing and intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) mapping. Can J Neurol Sci 1991, 18:28-38.
16. Lyons M.K. Deep brain stimulation: Current and future clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc 2011, 86:662-672.
17. Marsac L., Chauvet D., Larrat B., Pernot M., Robert B., Fink M., Boch A.L., Aubry J.F., Tanter M. MR-guided adaptive focusing of therapeutic ultrasound beams in the human head. Med Phys 2012, 39:1141-1149.
18. Martin E., Jeanmonod D., More A., Zadicario E., Werner B. High-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive functional neurosurgery. Ann Neurol 2009, 66:858-861.
19. Matyas F., Sreenivasan V., Marbach F., Wacongne C., Barsy B., Mateo C., Aronoff R., Petersen C.C. Motor control by sensory cortex. Science 2010, 330:1240-1243.
20. McDannold N., Clement G.T., Black P., Jolesz F., Hynynen K. Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: Initial findings in 3 patients. Neurosurgery 2010, 66:323-332.
21. O'Reilly M.A., Muller A., Hynynen K. Ultrasound insertion loss of rat parietal bone appears to be proportional to animal mass atsubmegahertz frequencies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 11:1930-1937.
22. Pernot M., Aubry J.F., Tanter M., Thomas J.L., Fink M. High power transcranial beam steering for ultrasonic brain therapy. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:2577-2589.
23. Pronichev I.V., Lenkov D.N. Functional mapping of the motor cortex of the white mouse by a microstimulation method. Neurosci Behav Physiol 1998, 28:80-85.
24. Tennant K.A., Adkins D.L., Donlan N.A., Asay A.L., Thomas N., Kleim J.A., Jones T.A. The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture. Cereb Cortex 2011, 4:865-876.
25. Tufail Y., Matyushov A., Baldwin N., Tauchmann M.L., Georges J., Yoshihiro A., Tillery S.I., Tyler W.J. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 2010, 66:681-694.
26. Yoo S.S., Bystritsky A., Lee J.H., Zhang Y., Fischer K., Min B.K., McDannold N.J., Pascual-Leone A., Jolesz F.A. Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity. NeuroImage 2011, 56:1267-1277.