Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 312-331

  King, Randy L ^a   Brown, Julian R ^b   Newsome, William T ^b,c   Pauly, Kim Butts ^a,d  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Electromyography; In vivo; Neuromodulation; Neurostimulation; Therapeutic Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; NEURONS;

ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS; CONTINUOUS WAVES; EFFECTIVE PARAMETERS; IN-VIVO; MOTOR RESPONSE; NEURAL ACTIVITY; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROSTIMULATION; STIMULATION PROTOCOLS; STIMULUS INTENSITY; THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND; TIME INTERVAL; TRANSCRANIAL;

ULTRASONICS;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTINUOUS WAVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; IN VIVO STUDY; LATENT PERIOD; MOUSE; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SOMATOMOTOR RESPONSE; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT; ULTRASOUND; WAVEFORM;

EID: 84871757964     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1988, 7:S1-S38. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM).
2. Section 7-Discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. J Ultrasound Med 2000, 19:143-168. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM).
3. Aravanis A.M., Wang L.P., Zhang F., Meltzer L.A., Mogri M.Z., Schneider M.B., Deisseroth K. An optical neural Interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiber-optic and optogenetic technology. J Neural Eng 2007 Sep, 4:S143-S156.
4. Brecht M., Krauss A., Muhammad S., Sinai-Esfahani L., Bellanca S., Margrie T.W. Organization of rat vibrissa motor cortex and adjacent areas according to cytoarchitectonics, microstimulation, and intracellular stimulation of identified cells. J Comp Neurol 2004, 479:360-373.
5. Benham C.D., Gunthorpe M.J., Davis J.B. TRPV channels as temperature sensors. Cell Calcium 2003, 33:479-487.
6. Bystritsky A., Korb A.S., Douglas P.K., Cohen M.S., Melega W.P., Mulgaonkar A.P., DeSalles A., Min B.K., Yoo S.S. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul 2011, 4:125-136.
7. Clement G.T., White P.J., King R.L., McDannold N., Hynynen K. A magnetic resonance imaging-patible, large-scale array for trans-skull ultrasound surgery and therapy. J Ultrasound in Med 2005, 24:1117-1125.
8. Farny C.H., Holt R.G., Roy R.A. Temporal and spatial detection of HIFU-induced inertial and hot-vapor cavitation with a diagnostic ultrasound system. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:603-615.
9. Fitzgerald P.B., Daskalakis Z.J. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. Expert Rev Med Devices 2011, 8:85-95.
10. Fry F.J., Ades H.W., Fry W.J. Production of reversible changes in the central nervous system by ultrasound. Science 1958, 127:83-84.
11. Gavrilov L.R., Tsirulnikov E.M., Davies I.A. Application of focused ultrasound for the stimulation of neural structures. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996, 22:179-192.
12. Gavrilov L.R., Tsirulnikov E.M. Focused ultrasound as a tool to input sensory information to humans. Acoust Physics 2012, 58:3-27.
13. Glimcher P.W., Sparks D.L. Effects of low-frequency stimulation of the superior colliculus on spontaneous and visually guided saccades. J Neurophysiol 1993, 69:953-964.
14. Harvey E.N. The effect of high-frequency sound waves on heart muscle and other irritable tissues. Am J Physiol 1929, 91:284-290.
15. Huber D., Petreanu L., Ghitani N., Ranade S., Hromádka T., Mainen Z., Svoboda K. Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice. Nature 2008, 451:61-64.
16. Hynynen K. The threshold for thermally significant cavitation in dog's thigh muscle in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991, 17:157-169.
17. Hynynen K., McDannold N., Clement G., Jolesz F.A., Zadicario E., Killiany R., Moore T., Rosen D. Preclinical testing of a phased array ultrasound system for MRI-guided noninvasive surgery of the brain: A primate study. Eur J Radiology 2006, 59:149-156.
18. Jagannathan J., Sanghvi N.T., Crum L.A., Yen C.P., Medel R., Dumont A.S., Sheehan J.P., Steiner L., Jolesz F., Kassell N.F. High-intensity focused ultrasound surgery of the brain: Part 1-A historical perspective with modern applications. Neurosurgery 2009, 64:201-210.
19. Johns L.D. Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis. J Athl Train 2002, 37:293-299.
20. Kahn I., Desai M., Knoblich U., Bernstein J., Henninger M., Graybiel A.M., Boyden E.S., Buckner R.L., Moore C.I. Characterization of the functional MRI response temporal linearity via optical control of neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 2011, 31:15086-15091.
21. Khraiche M.L., Phillips W.B., Jackson N., Muthuswamy J. Ultrasound induced increase in excitability of single neurons. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008, 2008:4246-4249.
22. Krasovitski B., Frenkel V., Shoham S., Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:3258-3263.
23. LaLumiere R.T. A new technique for controlling the brain: Optogenetics and its potential for use in research and the clinic. Brain Stimul 2011, 4:1-6.
24. Lyons M.K. Deep brain stimulation: current and future clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc 2011, 86:662-672.
25. Martin E., Jeanmonod D., Morel A., Zadicario E., Werner B. High-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive functional neurosurgery. Ann Neurol 2009, 66:858-861.
26. Marsac L., Chauvet D., Larrat B., Pernot M., Robert B., Fink M., Boch A.L., Aubry J.F., Tanter M. MR-guided adaptive focusing of therapeutic ultrasound beams in the human head. Med Phys 2012, 39:1141-1149.
27. Menz MD, Oralkan O, Guleyupoglu E, Khuri-Yakub P, Baccus S. Precise neural stimulation of the retina using focal ultrasound. Neuroscience meeting planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience; program 818.21; 2010; Available at: http://www.sfn.org/am2010/pdf/final_program/final_program_b6.pdf.
28. McDannold N., Clement G.T., Black P., Jolesz F., Hynynen K. Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: Initial findings in 3 patients. Neurosurgery 2010, 66:323-332.
29. Murasugi C.M., Salzman C.D., Newsome W.T. Microstimulation in visual area MT: Effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency. J Neurosci 1993, 13:1719-1729.
30. O'Brien W.D. Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. Prog Biophys Molec Biol 2007, 93:212-255.
31. Patapoutian A., Peier A.M., Story G.M., Viswanath V. Thermo TRP channels and beyond: Mechanisms of temperature sensation. Nature Rev Neurosci 2003, 4:529-539.
32. Pernot M., Aubry J.F., Tanter M., Thomas J.L., Fink M. High power transcranial beam steering for ultrasonic brain therapy. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:2577-2589.
33. Salzman C.D., Britten K.H., Newsome W.T. Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction. Nature 1990, 6280:174-177.
34. Sponer J. Dependence of the cavitation threshold on the ultrasonic frequency. Czech J Phys 1990, 40:1123-1132.
35. Stanford T.R., Freedman E.G., Sparks D.L. Site and parameters of microstimulation: Evidence for independent effects on the properties of saccades evoked from the primate superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 1996, 76:3360-3381.
36. Santos H.M., Lodeiro C., Capelo-Martinez J.L. The power of ultrasound. Ultrasound in chemistry: Analytical applications 2009, 1-3. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany. J.L. Capelo-Martinez (Ed.).
37. ter Haar G.R., Daniels S. Evidence for ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo. Phys Med Biol 1981, 26:1145-1149.
38. ter Haar G.R., Daniels S., Eastaugh K.C., Hill C.R. Ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo. Br J Cancer 1982, 5:151-155.
39. ter Haar G.R., Daniels S., Morton K. Evidence for acoustic cavitation in vivo: Thresholds for bubble formation with 0.75-Mhz continuous wave and pulsed beams. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Cont 1986, 33:162-164.
40. Tufail Y., Yoshihiro A., Pati S., Li M.M., Tyler W.J. Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat Protoc 2011, 6:1453-1470.
41. Tufail Y., Matyushov A., Baldwin N., Tauchmann M.L., Georges J., Yoshihiro A., Tillery S.I., Tyler W.J. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 2010, 66:681-694.
42. Tyler W.J. Noninvasive neuromodulation with ultrasound? A continuum mechanics hypothesis. Neuroscientist 2011, 17:25-36.
43. Tyler W.J., Tufail Y., Finsterwald M., Tauchmann M.L., Olson E.J., Majestic C. Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3511. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0003511.
44. Wells P.N.T. Absorption and dispersion of ultrasound in biological tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 1975, 1:369-376.
45. Wood R.W., Loomis A.L. The physical and biological effects of high frequency sound waves of great intensity. Phil Mag 1927, 4:417-436.
46. Wulff V.J., Fry W.J., Tucker D., Fry F.J., Melton C. Effects of ultrasonic vibrations on nerve tissues. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1951, 76:361-366.
47. Yoo S.S., Bystritsky A., Lee J.H., Zhang Y., Fischer K., Min B.K., McDannold N.J., Pascual-Leone A., Jolesz F.A. Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1267-1275.