Process this: Undergraduate writing in composition studies

Process This: Undergraduate Writing in Composition Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-169

  DeJoy, Nancy C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901871527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (95)

1. Adler-Kassner, Linda, Robert Crooks and Ann Watters, eds. 1997. Service Learning and Composition at the Crossroads. Writing the Community: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Composition. Washington, DC: American Association For Higher Education in Cooperation with National Council of Teachers of English: 1-17.
2. Aristotle. 1954. The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts and Ingram Bywater. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Atkins, G. Douglas and Michael Johnson, eds. 1995. Writing and Reading Differently: Deconstruction and the Teaching of Composition and Literature. University Press of Kansas.
4. Bacon, Nora. 1997. Community Service Writing: Problems, Challenges, Outcomes Writing the Community: Concepts and Models for Service- Learning in Composition. Washington, DC: American Association For Higher Education in Cooperation with National Council of Teachers of English: 39-55.
5. Bartholomae, David. 1996. What is Composition and (if you know what that is) Why Do We Teach It? Bloom et al. 1996.
6. Berlin, James A. 1996. Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring College English Studies. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
7. Berlin, James A. 1988. Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class. College English 50.5: 477-494.
8. Berlin, James A. 1984. Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges and Universities. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9. Berlin, James A. and Robert Inkster. 1980. Current Traditional Rhetoric: Paradigm and Practice. Freshman English News 8.3: 1-6.
10. Bloom, Lynn Z., Donald Daiker and Edward M. White, eds. 1996. Composition in the Twenty-First Century: Crisis and Change. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
11. Bizzell, Patricia. 1992. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12. Bridwell-Bowles, Lillian. 1995. Discourse and Diversity: Experimental Writing in the Academy. Feminine Principles and Women's Experience in American Composition and Rhetoric, edited by Louise Wetherbee Phelps and Janet Emig. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press: 43-66.
13. Broad, Bob. 2003. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.
14. Brodkey, Linda. 1996. Writing Permitted in Designated Areas Only. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Brody, Miriam. 1993. Manly Writing: Gender, Rhetoric, and the Rise of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Cassidy, Nicole. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur Il. October 26, 2002.
17. Cronin, Doreen and Betsy Lewin. 2000. Click, Clack, Moo Cows That Type. New York: Simon and Schuster.
18. Crowley, Sharon. 1996. Around 1971: Current-Traditional Rhetoric and Process Models of Composing. In Bloom et al. 1996.
19. Crowley, Sharon. 1990. The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current- Traditions Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
20. Cushman, Ellen. 1996. The Rhetorician as an Agent of Social Change. College Composition and Communication. 47.1: 7-28.
21. Daiker, Donald A. 1996. Introduction: The New Geography of Composition. In Bloom et al. 1996.
22. Daly, Mary and Jane Caputi. 1987. Websters' First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language. London: The Women's Press Ltd.
23. De Joy, Nancy. 2000. Faculty Development, Service Learning, and Composition: A Communal Approach to Professional Development. Reflections. 1.2: 30-34.
24. De Joy, Nancy. 1999. I Was a Process-Model Baby. In Kent 1999.
25. De Joy, Nancy. 1994. Reconfiguring the Grounds of/for Composition Studies: Alternative Routes to Subjectivity in the Work of James A. Berlin. Mediations, Fall.
26. De Pizan, Christine. 1982. The Book of the City of Ladies. Trans. Earl Jeffrey Richards. New York: Persea Books.
27. Diehl, William and Larry Mikulecky. 1988. The Nature of Reading at Work. Perspectives on Literacy, edited by Eugene R Kintgen, Barry M. Kroll, and Mike Rose. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press: 371-377.
28. Dobrin, Sidney. 1999. Paralogic Hermeneutic Theorise, Power, and the Possibility for Liberating Pedagogies. In Kent 1999.
29. Eason, Jennifer. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur IL. October 27, 2002.
30. Ede, Lisa. 1994. Reading the Writing Process Taking Stock: The Writing Process Movement in the '90s, edited by Lad Tobin and Thomas Newkirk. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook: 31-43.
31. Ede, Lisa and Andrea Lunsford. 1984. Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy. College Composition and Communication. 35: 155-71.
32. Elbow, Peter. 1987. Closing My Eyes as I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience. College English. 49: 50-69.
33. Elbow, Peter. 1981. Writing With Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Flower, Linda. 1997. Partners in Inquiry: A Logic For Community Outreach. Writing the Community: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Composition. Washington, DC: American Association For Higher Education in Cooperation with National Council of Teachers of English: 95-117.
35. Flynn, Elizabeth. 2000. Review of Rhetoric and Composition as Intellectual Work. JAC, 22: 977-981.
36. Gordimer, Nadine. 1995. Writing and Being. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
37. Gunzenhauser, Bonnie. Personal Interview. Decatur, IL. December, 2002.
38. Helmers, Marguerite. 1994. Writing Students: Composition Testimonials and Representations of Students. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Herzberg, Bruce. 1997. Community Service and Critical Teaching. Writing the Community: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Composition. Washington, DC: American Association For Higher Education and National Council of Teachers of English: 57-69.
40. Hood, Carla. 2003. Letter The Chronicle of Higher Education. May 2, 2003.
41. Hooks, Bell. 1995. Killing Rage/Ending Racism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
42. Huot, Brian. 2002. (Re) Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning. Logan: Utah State University Press.
43. Jarratt, Susan C. 1998. Introduction: As We Were Saying Feminism and Composition Studies: In Other Words. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.: 1-18.
44. Jarratt, Susan C. 2002. New Dispositions for Historical Studies in Rhetoric. In Olson 2002.
45. Kent, Thomas. 1999. Introduction. Ed. Thomas Kent. Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press:1-6.
46. King-Grindy, Rosemarie. Personal Interview. Decatur, IL. December, 2002.
47. Kline, Michael W. 1999. Teaching a Single Textbook 'Rhetoric': The Potential Heaviness of the Book. (Re)Visioning Composition Textbooks: Conflicts of Culture, Ideology, and Pedagogy, edited by Xin Liu Gale and Fredric G. Gale. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48. Knoblauch, C.H. and Lil Brannon. 1993. Critical Teaching and the Idea of Literacy. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.
49. Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. Translated Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.
50. Lauer, Janice. 2002. Rhetorical Invention: The Diaspora. Perspectives on Rhetorical Invention, edited by Janet M. Atwill and Janice M. Lauer. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press: 1-15.
51. Lawler, Jennifer. 1995. The Screenwriter's Tale This Fine Place So Far From Home: Voices of Academics From the Working Class, edited by C. L. Barney Dews and Carolyn Leste Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 54-65.
52. Matsuda, Paul Kei. 2003. Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12: 65-83.
53. McComiskey, Bruce. 2002. Teaching Composition as a Social Process. Logan: Utah State University Press.
54. Meisenheimer, Travis. 2002. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur IL. October 26 and 27, 2002.
55. Miller, Susan. 1993. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
56. Miller, Susan. 1991. The Feminization of Composition, The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary, edited by Richard Bullock and John Trimbur. Portsmouth: Boynton Cook: 39-54.
57. Murray, Donald. 1980. Writing as Process: How Writing Finds Its Own Meaning Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition, edited by Timothy R. Donovan and Ben W. McClelland. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English: 3-20.
58. Neel, Jasper. Reclaiming our Theoretical Heritage. In Olson 2002.
59. North, Stephen N. 2000. Refiguring the Ph. D. in English Studies: Writing, Doctoral Education and the Fusion-Based Curriculum. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
60. Ohmann, Richard. 1976. English in America: A Radical View of the Profession. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.
61. Olson, Gary, ed. 2002. Rhetoric and Composition as Intellectual Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
62. Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy. New York: Routledge.
63. Osborne, Linda. 2002. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur IL. October 27, 2002.
64. Owens, Carrie. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur IL. October 26, 2002.
65. Parks, Douglas B. 1982. The Meanings of Audience. College English 44: 247-57.
66. Parks, Stephen. 2000. Class Politics: The Movement for the Students' Right to Their Own Language. Urbana: NCTE.
67. Pecheux, Michel. 1975. Language, Semiotics and Ideology. New York: St. Martin's Press.
68. Perl, Sondra, ed. 1994. Landmark Essays on Writing Process. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press.
69. Ratcliffe, Krista. 1996. Anglo-American Feminist Challenges to the Rhetorical Traditions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
70. Reither, James A. 2000. Writing and Knowing: Toward Redefining the Writing Process, The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook, Fourth Edition, edited by Edward P.J. Corbett, Nancy Myers, and Gary Tate. New York: Oxford University Press: 162-169.
71. Resnick, Daniel P. and Lauren B. Resnick. 1988. The Nature of Literacy: A Historical Exploration Perspectives on Literacy, edited by Eugene R. Kingten, Barry M. Kroll, and Mike Rose. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press: 190-202.
72. Rose, Mike. 1989. Lives on the Boundary: The Struggles and Achievements of America's Underprepared. New York: Free Press.
73. Royster, Jacqueline Jones. 2000. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change Among African American Women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
74. Ruggles-Gere, Anne. 1996. The Long Revolution in Composition. In Bloom et al. 1996.
75. Salvatori, Mariolina. 2000. Conversations with Texts: Reading in the Teaching of Composition The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook, Fourth Edition, edited by Edward P. J. Corbett, Nancy Myers, and Gary Tate. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Schleppenbach, Meg. 2002. Personal Interview. Millikin University, Decatur IL. October 26, 2002.
77. Shaughnessey, Mina. 1977. Errors and Expectations: A Guide For the Teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
78. Shor, Ira. 1992. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching For Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. Showalter, Elaine, ed. 1985. Introduction. The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Literature and Theory. New York: Pantheon Books.
80. Slevin, James F. 2001. Introducing English: Essays in the Intellectual Work of Composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
81. Sowinska, Suzanne. 1993. Yer Own Motha Wouldna Reckanized Ya: Surviving an Apprenticeship in the Knowledge Factory. Working Class Women in the Academy: Laborers in the Knowledge Factory, edited by Michelle M. Tokarczyk and Elizabeth A. Fay. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: 148-161.
82. Spellmeyer, Kurt. 1996. Inventing the University Student. In Bloom et al. 1996.
83. Spellmeyer, Kurt. 1993. Common Ground: Dialogue, Understanding, and the Teaching of Composition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
84. Steinem, Gloria. 1994. Moving Beyond Words. New York: Simon and Schuster.
85. Swearingen, C. Jan. 2002. Rhetoric and Composition as a Coherent Intellectual Discipline. In Olson 2002.
86. Tobin, Lad. 1994. How the Writing Process Was Born-And Other Conversion Narratives. Taking Stock: The Writing Process Movement in the '90s, edited by Lad Tobin and Thomas Newkirk. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook: 1-14.
87. Trimbur, John. 1994. Taking the Social Turn: Teaching Writing Post Process. College Composition and Communication, 45.1: 108-118.
88. Trimbur, John. 1996. Writing Instruction and the Politics of Professionalization. In Bloom et al. 1996.
89. Trimbur, John. 2000. Delivering the Message: Typography and the Materaility of Writing. In Olson 2002.
90. Wallace, David L. and Helen Rothschild Ewald. 2000. Mutuality in the Rhetoric and Composition Classroom. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
91. Welty, Eudora. 1983. One Writer's Beginnings. New York: Warner Books.
92. Williams, Raymond. 1991. Writing in Society. London: Verso.
93. Wolf, Naomi. 1991. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. New York: William Morrow.
94. Woolf, Virginia. 1929. A Room of One's Own. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
95. Worsham, Lynn. 2002. Coming to Terms: Theory, Writing, Politics. In Olson 2002.