Differences in within- and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: Analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 462-473

  Rush, Jonathan ^a   Hofer, Scott M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Affect; Emotion; Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis; Multilevel structural equation modeling; PANAS; Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EMOTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISEASE; POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT SCHEDULE; STRESS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; VALIDATION STUDY; AFFECT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; MOOD DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFFECT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOOD DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901850201     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: 1939134X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035666     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Almeida, D. (1998). Daily Inventory of Stressful Events (DISE) expert coding manual. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Division of Family Studies and Human Development.
2. Beck, J. G., Novy, D. M., Diefenbach, G. J., Stanley, M. A., Averill, P. M., & Swann, A. C. (2003). Differentiating anxiety and depression in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 15, 184-192. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.184.
3. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
4. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N., Kupfer, A., Steca, P., Caprara, M. G., Abela, J. (2012). The Positivity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24, 701-712. doi:10.1037/a0026681.
5. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165.
6. Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7. Clark, D. A. (Ed.). (2004). Intrusive thoughts in clinical disorders: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245-265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934.
9. Crocker, P. R. E. (1997). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with a youth sample. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 91-97.
10. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583-619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356.
11. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105.
12. Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.130.
13. Flett, G. L., Molnar, D. S., Nepon, T., & Hewitt, P. L. (2012). A mediational model of perfectionistic automatic thoughts and psychosomatic symptoms: The roles of negative affect and daily hassles. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 565-570. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.010.
14. Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J.-P. (2006). Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 240-249. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240.
15. Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2013). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0032138.
16. Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029-1041. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.1029.
17. Green, D. P., & Salovey, P. (1999). In what sense are positive and negative affect independent? A reply to Tellegen, Watson, and Clark. Psychological Science, 10, 304-306. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00158.
18. Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293-319. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938.
19. Hoffman, L., & Stawski, R. S. (2009). Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development, 6, 97-120. doi:10.1080/15427600902911189.
20. Hu, J., & Gruber, K. J. (2008). Positive and negative affect and health functioning indicators among older adults with chronic illnesses. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 29, 895-911. doi:10.1080/01612840802182938.
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoffcriteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
22. Jolly, J. B., Dyck, M. J., Kramer, T. A., & Wherry, J. N. (1994). Integration of positive and negative affectivity and cognitive content-specificity: Improved discrimination of anxious and depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 544-552. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.3.544.
23. Kercher, K. (1992). Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging, 14, 131-168. doi:10.1177/0164027592142001.
24. Koydemir, S., Simsek, Ö. F., Schütz, A., & Tipandjan, A. (2013). Differences in how trait emotional intelligence predicts life satisfaction: The role of affect balance versus social support in India and Germany. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 51-66. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9315-1.
25. Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: On the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23, 215-225. doi:10.1037/a0021400.
26. Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Lü, W. (2013). Resilience and affect balance as mediators between trait emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 850-855. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.010.
27. Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203-229. doi:10.1037/a0012869.
28. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764-802. doi:10.1080/00273170903333665.
29. Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 2-9. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.003.
30. Muthén, B. O. (1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 338-354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00363.x.
31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
32. Ng, F., Dodd, S., & Berk, M. (2007). The effects of physical activity in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 101, 259-262. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.014.
33. Pasco, J. A., Jacka, F. N., Williams, L. J., Brennan, S. L., Leslie, E., & Berk, M. (2011). Don't worry, be active: Positive affect and habitual physical activity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 1047-1052. doi:10.3109/00048674.2011.621063.
34. Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233. doi:10.1037/a0020141.
35. Rast, P., Hofer, S. M., & Sparks, C. (2012). Modeling individual differences in within-person variation of negative and positive affect in a mixed effects location scale model using BUGS/JAGS. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 177-200. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.658328.
36. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419-435. doi: 10.1177/0146167200266002.
37. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. é., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373. doi:10.1037/a0029315.
38. Röcke, C., Li, S.-C., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863-878. doi:10.1037/a0016276.
39. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714.
40. Sliwinski, M. J., Almeida, D. M., Smyth, J., & Stawski, R. S. (2009). Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: Findings from two measurement-burst diary studies. Psychology and Aging, 24, 828-840. doi:10.1037/a0017925.
41. Stawski, R. S., Mogle, J., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2011). Intraindividual coupling of daily stressors and cognitive interference in old age. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(Suppl. 1), i121-i129. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr012.
42. Stawski, R. S., Sliwinski, M. J., Almeida, D. M., & Smyth, J. M. (2008). Reported exposure and emotional reactivity to daily stressors: The roles of adult age and global perceived stress. Psychology and Aging, 23, 52-61.
43. Terraciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131-141. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131.
44. Tuccitto, D. E., Giacobbi, P. R., Jr., & Leite, W. L. (2010). The internal structure of positive and negative affect: A confirmatory factor analysis of the PANAS. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 125-141. doi:10.1177/0013164409344522.
45. Vansteelandt, K., Van Mechelen, I., & Nezlek, J. B. (2005). The cooccurrence of emotions in daily life: A multilevel approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 325-335. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.05.006.
46. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346-353. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.346.
47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
48. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219.
49. Wichers, M., Peeters, F., Rutten, B. P. F., Jacobs, N., Derom, C., Thiery, E., van Os, J. (2012). A time-lagged momentary assessment study of daily life physical activity and affect. Health Psychology, 31, 135-144. doi:10.1037/a0025688.
50. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Abraham, J. (2006). Borderline personality features: Instability of self-esteem and affect. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 668-687. doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.6.668.
51. Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111-122. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.111.
52. Zimprich, D., & Allemand, M. (2012). Within-and between-person structure of affect in old age. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.