Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 131-141

  Terracciano, Antonio ^a   McCrae, Robert R ^a   Costa Jr , Paul T ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

CFA; Crosscultural; Estimation method; Positive negative affect; Tripartite model of anxiety and depression

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038401327     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Allik, J., & Realo, A. (1997). Emotional experience and its relation to the five-factor model in Estonian. Journal of Personality, 65, 625-647.
2. Arbuckle, J.L. (1994). AMOS (Version 4.01). Chicago: Small-Waters Corp.
3. Balatsky, G., & Diener, E. (1993). Subjective well-being among Russian students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225-243.
4. Barrett, L.F., & Russell, A.A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10-14.
5. Bentler, P.M. (1989). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
6. Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations programs. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
7. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Borgatta, E.F. (1961). Mood, personality and interaction. Journal of General Psychology, 64, 105-137.
9. Bradburn, N.M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance-structures. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
11. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Byrne, B.M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Clark, L.A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression - Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316-336.
15. Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on subjective well-being - Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.
16. Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) - Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
17. Costa, P.T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R.R. (in press). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
18. Crocker, P.R.E. (1997). A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive affect negative affect schedule (PANAS) with a youth sport sample. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 91-97.
19. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
20. Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141.
21. Fabes, R.A., & Martin, C.L. (1991). Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 532-540.
22. Fava, G.A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 249-251.
23. Gencoz, T. (2000). Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15, 19-28.
24. Green, D.P., Goldman, S.L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029-1041.
25. Haven, S., & ten Berge, J.M.F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Heymans Bulletin 290 EX, University of Groningen.
26. Hilleras, P.K., Jorm, A.F., Herlitz, A., & Winblad, B. (1998). Negative and positive affect among the very old - A survey on a sample age 90 years or older. Research On Aging, 20, 593-610.
27. Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
28. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure-analysis be trusted. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
29. Izard, C.E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.
30. Joiner, T.E., Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., & Marquina, G. (1997). Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (More) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 600-615.
31. Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: User's reference guide. (1st ed.): Scientific Software, Inc.
33. Kercher, K. (1992). Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research On Aging, 14, 131-168.
34. Krohne, H.W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Investigations with a German version of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
35. Kiernan, G., Laurent, J., Joiner, T.E., Catanzaro, S.J., & MacLachlan, M. (2001). Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model with children: Data from the Barretstown studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 359-379.
36. Larsen, R.J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M.S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25-59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Lonigan, C.J., Hooe, E.S., David, C.F., & Kistner, J.A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 374-386.
38. MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
39. Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A.F., Christensen, H., Korten, A.E., Jacomb, P.A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405-416.
40. Mardia, K.V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
41. Mardia, K.V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhva, B36, 115-128.
42. McCrae, R.R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819-846.
43. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full Five-Factor Model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227-232.
44. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., de Lima, M.P., Simöes, A., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Marušić, I., Bratko, D., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Chae, J.H., & Piedmont, R.L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466-477.
45. McCrae, R.R., Herbst, J.H., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (2001). Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. In R. Riemann, F.M. Spinath, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure (pp. 217-231). Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers.
46. McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Bond, M.H., Costa, P.T., Jr., & Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
47. Melvin, G.A., & Molloy, G.N. (2000). Some psychometric properties of the positive and negative affect schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports, 86, 1209-1212.
48. Meng, X.L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation-coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
49. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
50. Molloy, G.N., Pallant, J.F., & Kantas, A. (2001). A psychometric comparison of the positive and negative affect schedule across age and sex. Psychological Reports, 88, 861-862.
51. Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52. Nowlis, V., & Nowlis, H.H. (1956). The description and analysis of mood. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 65, 345-355.
53. Olsson, U.K., Foss, T., Troye, S.V., & Howell, R.D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557-595.
54. Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
55. Russell, J.A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
56. Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T.E., Santed, M.A., & Valiente, R.M. (1999). The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence. Psicothema, 11, 37-51.
57. Tanaka, J.S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297-303.
59. Terracciano, A. (2001). The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation. Personality and Individual Differences.
60. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J.W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1: Theory and method (pp. 257-300). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
61. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69, 1007-1031.
62. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y.P. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29-37.
63. Vassend, O., & Skrondal, A. (1997). Validation of the NEO Personality Inventory and the five-factor model. Can findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be reconciled? European Journal of Personality, 11, 147-166.
64. Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1990). Preliminary manual for the positive and negative affect schedule (expanded form). Unpublished manuscript, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
65. Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1992). On traits and temperament General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the 5-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441-476.
66. Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1997). Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 267-296.
67. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
68. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
69. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820-838.
70. Yik, M.S.M., Russell, J.A., Oceja, L.V., & Fernández Dols, J.M. (2000). Momentary affect in Spanish: Scales, structure, and relationship to personality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 160-176.